This better matches the existing API of TreeFormatter, but is just a
simple delegation to build().
Change-Id: I188f43acc34455e773d63836724b05e18f5c7a84
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Reviewed-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>
These objects don't need to be updated with the resulting ObjectId of
the formatted content, callers can get that from the ObjectInserter on
their own.
Change-Id: Idc5f097de9f7beafc5e54e597383d82daf9d7db4
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Reviewed-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>
Correct CommitBuilder, TagBuilder method to be build()
The correct names for these is build(), as that is what a Java
developer will expect given the "builder" pattern.
Bug: 323541
Change-Id: I35042bdc95a955beeaee29e54bde10e4240b2a71
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Reviewed-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>
Move commit and tag formatting to CommitBuilder, TagBuilder
These objects should be responsible for their own formatting,
rather than delegating it to some obtuse type called ObjectInserter.
While we are at it, simplify the way we insert these into a database.
Passing in the type and calling format in application code turned
out to be a huge mistake in terms of ease-of-use of the insert API.
Change-Id: Id5bb95ee56aa2a002243e9b7853b84ec8df1d7bf
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Since these types no longer support reading, calling them a Builder
is a better description of what they do. They help the caller to
build a commit or a tag object.
Change-Id: I53cae5a800a66ea1721b0fe5e702599df31da05d
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Add documentation explaining how to read Commit and Tag
Since we stopped supporting these types for reading, but their
name is a natural candidate for someone to try and use in code,
explain where they should be looking instead.
Change-Id: I091a1b0ef71b842016020f938ba3161431aab9c9
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The Tag class now only supports the creation of an annotated tag
object. To read an annotated tag, applictions should use RevTag.
This permits us to have exactly one implementation, and RevTag's
is faster and more bug-free.
Change-Id: Ib573f7e15f36855112815269385c21dea532e2cf
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
There was a duplicated getter and setter for tagger in Tag.
There's no needed to have two getters and setters that represent
the same things. The appropriate tests were updated also.
Change-Id: If46dc00c4c0f31ea4234c6d3bda3c03e6ebbafac
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>
Start using ObjectInserter instead of ObjectWriter
Some newer style APIs are updated to use the newer ObjectInserter
interface instead of the now deprecated ObjectWriter. In many of
the unit tests we don't bother to release the inserter, these are
typically using the file backend which doesn't need a release,
but in the future should use an in-memory HashMap based store,
which really wouldn't need it either.
Change-Id: I91a15e1dc42da68e6715397814e30fbd87fa2e73
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The strings are externalized into the root resource bundles.
The resource bundles are stored under the new "resources" source
folder to get proper maven build.
Strings from tests are, in general, not externalized. Only in
cases where it was necessary to make the test pass the strings
were externalized. This was typically necessary in cases where
e.getMessage() was used in assert and the exception message was
slightly changed due to reuse of the externalized strings.
Change-Id: Ic0f29c80b9a54fcec8320d8539a3e112852a1f7b
Signed-off-by: Sasa Zivkov <sasa.zivkov@sap.com>
Per CQ 3448 this is the initial contribution of the JGit project
to eclipse.org. It is derived from the historical JGit repository
at commit 3a2dd9921c.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>