This fixes the tests failed in JDK8.
FS uses java.nio API to get file attributes. The timestamps obtained
from that API are more precise than the ones from
java.io.File#lastModified() since Java8.
This difference accidentally makes JGit detect newly added files as
smudged. Use the precised timestamp to avoid this false positive.
Bug: 500058
Change-Id: I9e587583c85cb6efa7562ad6c5f26577869a2e7c
Signed-off-by: Masaya Suzuki <masayasuzuki@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Loskutov <loskutov@gmx.de>
Repository: Introduce exactRef and findRef, deprecate getRef
The Repository class provides only one method to look up a ref by
name, getRef. If I request refs/heads/master and that ref does not
exist, getRef will look further in the search path:
ref/refs/heads/master
refs/heads/refs/heads/master
refs/remotes/refs/heads/master
This behavior is counterintuitive, needlessly inexpensive, and usually
not what the caller expects.
Allow callers to specify whether to use the search path by providing
two separate methods:
- exactRef, which looks up a ref when its exact name is known
- findRef, which looks for a ref along the search path
For backward compatibility, keep getRef as a deprecated synonym for
findRef.
This change introduces findRef and exactRef but does not update
callers outside tests to use them yet.
Change-Id: I35375d942baeb3ded15520388f8ebb9c0cc86f8c
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrn@google.com>
Fix ResolveMerger when files should be replaced by folders
When during Merge for a certain path OURS & BASE contains a file and
THEIRS contains a folder there was a bug in JGit leading to unnecessary
conflicts. This commit fixes it and adds a test for this situation.
Bug: 472693
Change-Id: I71fac5a6a2ef926c01adc266c6f9b3275e870129
Also-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Access static member LocalDiskRepositoryTestCase.CONTENT directly
37a1e4be moved this constant causing the following error message in
Eclipse: "The static field LocalDiskRepositoryTestCase.CONTENT should be
accessed directly".
Change-Id: I4ceb57a30f2e5a8f7e55109ef260a244ed5e7044
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Do not add a newline at the end if neither merged side had one
Bug: 390833
Change-Id: I29f7b79b241929877c93ac485c677487a91bb77b
Signed-off-by: André de Oliveira <andre.oliveira@liferay.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Fix RecursiveMerger in case of multiple, independent base commits
When RecursiveMerger found that there are multiple base-commits for the
commits to be merged it tries to temporarily merge the base commits. But
if these base commits have no common predecessor there was a bug in JGit
leading to a NPE. This commit fixes this by enforcing that an empty tree
is used as base when merging two unrelated base commits.
This logic was already there when merging two commits which have no
common predecessor (ThreeWayMerger.mergeBase()). But the code which was
computing a new temporary base commit in case of criss-cross merges
didn't take care to pick an empty tree when no common predecessor can be
found.
Bug: 462671
Change-Id: Ibd96302f5f81383f36d3b1e3edcbf5822147b1a4
Revert "CommitBuilder should check for duplicate parents"
This reverts commit 6bc48cdc62.
Until git v1.7.10.2~29^2~1 (builtin/merge.c: reduce parents early,
2012-04-17), C git merge would make merge commits with duplicate parents
when asked to with a series of commands like the following:
git checkout origin/master
git merge --no-ff origin/master
Nowadays "git merge" removes redundant parents more aggressively
(whenever one parent is an ancestor of another and not just when
duplicates exist) but merges with duplicate parents are still permitted
and can be created with git fast-import or git commit-tree and history
viewers need to be able to cope with them.
CommitBuilder is an interface analagous to commit-tree, so it should
allow duplicate parents. (That said, an option to automatically remove
redundant parents would be useful.)
Reported-by: Dave Borowitz <dborowitz@google.com>
Change-Id: Ia682238397eb1de8541802210fa875fdd50f62f0
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrn@google.com>
When setting the parents of a commit with setParentIds() or
addParentId() it should be checked that we don't have duplicate parents.
An IllegalArgumentException should be thrown in this case.
Change-Id: I9fa9f31149b7732071b304bca232f037146de454
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
RecursiveMerger should not fail on content-merge conflicts of parents
Previously when RecursiveMerger was trying to create a single virtual
common base for the merge it was failing when this lead to content-merge
conflicts. This is different from what native git is doing. When native
git's recursive merge algorithm creates a new common base it will merge
the multiple parents and simply take the merge result (potentially
including conflict markers) as common base. See my discussion with Shawn
here: http://www.spinics.net/lists/git/msg234959.html :
> - How should workingtree, index (stage1,2,3) look like if during
that
> merge of common ancestors a conflict occurs? Will I see in stage2
and
> stage3 really see content of X1 and X2?
Its done entirely in memory and never touches the working tree or
index. When a conflict exists in the X1-X2 merge the conflict is
preserved into the new virtual base.
There is still the possibility that the merge of parents lead to
conflicts. File/Folder conclicts, conflicts on filemodes. This commit
only fixes the situation for conflicts when merging content.
Bug: 438203
Change-Id: If45bc3d078b3d3de87b758e71d7379059d709603
Fix RecursiveMerger's internal use of merge to find a merge base
When RecursiveMerger tried to determine a common base tree it was
recursively tried to merge multiple common bases. But these intermediate
merges which have just been done to determine a single common base for
the final merge already filled some important fields (toBeCheckedOut,
toBeDeleted, ...). These side effects of the intermediate merges led to
wrong results of the final merge. One symptom was that after a recursive
merge which should be succesful you could still see leftover files in
the worktree: files which existed in the (virtual) common base but which
don't exist anymore in the branches to be merged.
The solution is easy: Clear the appropriate fields after common base
determination and start the final merge with a clean state.
Change-Id: I644ea9e1cb15360f7901bc0483cdb9286308c226
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
This fixes a case where we have CRLF in the repo but
LF in the worktree and are in autocrlf mode.
Change-Id: I0388270c1cf0fd22dfd513bcaa404eb97268d39d
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Move SampleDataRepositoryTestCase to org.eclipse.jgit.test
This class requires resources which are private to another
bundle. Move the class next to its resources, removing an
odd cross bundle dependency.
Change-Id: I30d5568b09ea5fb3bd3bb60b602f149c0867f49a
JGit 3.0: move internal classes into an internal subpackage
This breaks all existing callers once. Applications are not supposed
to build against the internal storage API unless they can accept API
churn and make necessary updates as versions change.
Change-Id: I2ab1327c202ef2003565e1b0770a583970e432e9
This fixes two cases:
- A folder without tracked content exist both in the workdir and merged
commit, as long as there names within that folder does not conflict.
- An empty folder structure exists with the same name as a file in the
merged commit.
Bug: 402834
Change-Id: I4c5b9f11313dd1665fcbdae2d0755fdb64deb3ef
Extend ResolveMerger with RecursiveMerger to merge two tips
that have up to 200 bases.
Bug: 380314
CQ: 6854
Change-Id: I6292bb7bda55c0242a448a94956f2d6a94fddbaa
Also-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <zx@twitter.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
In case of a conflict during cherry-pick or revert the commit message
was amended after the footer. This made the footer invalid. Many users
do not understand that they have to edit the commit message in order to
make it valid again.
Change-Id: I7e7fae125129e2a0d8950510550acda766531835
Bug: 367416
Refactor ResolveMergerTest to allow testing multiple strategies
By making use of JUnit Theories and Datapoints ResolveMergerTests is now
capable to run the tests against multiple Merge strategies.
Change-Id: Ifa0075e0a2aca7576ef268291b73fa2f4d79b591
Again teach ResolveMerger to create more correct DirCacheEntry's
Currently, after a merge/cherry-pick/rebase, all index entries are
smudged as the ResolveMerger never sets entry lengths and/or
modification times. This change teaches it to re-set them at least for
things it did not touch. The other entries are then repaired when the
index is persisted, or entries are checked out.
The first attempt to get this in was commit
3ea694c252 which has been reverted.
Since then some fixes to ResolveMerger and a few more tests have
been added which check situations where the index is not matching
HEAD before we merge.
Change-Id: I648fda30846615b3bf688c34274c6cf4bc857832
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Also-by: Markus Duft <markus.duft@salomon.at>
Teach ResolveMerger to create more correct DirCacheEntry's
Currently, after a merge/cherry-pick/rebase, all index entries are
smudged as the ResolveMerger never sets entry lengths and/or
modification times. This change teaches it to re-set them at least for
things it did not touch. The other entries are then repaired when the
index is persisted, or entries are checked out.
Change-Id: I0944f2017483d32043d0d09409b13055b5609a4b
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Don't return success on failing paths in ResolveMerger
ResolveMerger#mergeImpl() was only returning false (= failed) when there
were unmerged paths. In the case when there were only failing paths, it
returned true.
Because MergeCommand looks at the return value for determining if the
merge failed, it would fall into the successful case there, where it
should instead return a MergeResult with MergeStatus.FAILED.
This change adds a test case for this and makes the ResolveMerger return
false when there are failing paths.
This was discovered while working on fixing bug 354099 and is needed for
its test case.
Bug: 354099
Change-Id: I499f518f6289ef93e017db924b2aa857f2154707
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
Adapt merge message to C Git for remote-tracking branch
Commit 13931236b9 in C Git (2011-11-02)
changed the message format:
-Merge remote branch 'origin/foo'
+Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/foo'
This change does the same in EGit to be consistent.
Change-Id: I7d9c5afa95771dbfe6079b5f89a10b248fee0172
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
Optimize MergeAlgorithm if ours or theirs is empty
Previously when merging two contents with a non-empty base and one of
the contents was empty (size == 0) and the other was modified there
was a potentially expensive calculation until we finally always come
to the same result -> the complete non-deleted content should collide
with the empty content.
This proposal adds an optimization to detect empty input content and
to produce the appropriate result immediatly.
Change-Id: Ie6a837260c19d808f0e99173f570ff96dd22acd3
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Merging into a non-master branch would result in the following message:
Merge branch 'a' into HEAD
Now the merge message is correct:
Merge branch 'a' into b
Change-Id: I488f97190e4c1711c23a7a3cbd64f8b13a87bbac
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
The mapTree() routines have been deprecated for a long time, and their
sibilings for mapCommit() and mapTag() were already removed from the
main Repository API.
Remove mapTree(). Application callers who only need the tree's name
can use resolve("^{tree}") syntax to resolve to the tree ObjectId, or
fail if the input is not a tree.
Applications that want to read a tree should use DirCache or TreeWalk.
Change-Id: I85726413790fc87721271c482f6636f81baf8b82
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Don't print "into HEAD" when merging refs/heads/master
When MergeMessageFormatter was given a symbolic ref HEAD which points to
refs/heads/master (which is the case when merging a branch in EGit), it
would result in a merge message like the following:
Merge branch 'a' into HEAD
But it should print the following (as C Git does):
Merge branch 'a'
The solution is to use the leaf ref when checking for refs/heads/master.
Change-Id: I28ae5713b7e8123a0176fc6d7356e469900e7e97
This is almost reverted cherry-pick, and the implementation is
almost identical. It orders the input to merge differently to get
the effect and produces a different commit message with the
default author, rather than the original author.
Change-Id: I39970091d9f7406ae7168b8efaab23a5e2c16bad
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
Eclipse has some problem re-running single JUnit tests if
the tests are in Junit 3 format, but the JUnit 4 launcher
is used. This was quite unnecessary and the move was not
completed. We still have no JUnit4 test.
This completes the extermination of JUnit3. Most of the
work was global searce/replace using regular expression,
followed by numerous invocarions of quick-fix and organize
imports and verification that we had the same number of
tests before and after.
- Annotations were introduced.
- All references to JUnit3 classes removed
- Half-good replacement for getting the test name. This was
needed to make the TestRngs work. The initialization of
TestRngs was also made lazily since we can not longer find
out the test name in runtime in the @Before methods.
- Renamed test classes to end with Test, with the exception
of TestTranslateBundle, which fails from Maven
- Moved JGitTestUtil to the junit support bundle
Change-Id: Iddcd3da6ca927a7be773a9c63ebf8bb2147e2d13
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Change default diff algorithm to histogram and add tests
The referenced bug showed that JGit produced different merge results
compared to C Git. Unit test was added to reproduce the issue. The
problem can be solved by switching to histogram diff algorithm.
Bug: 331078
Change-Id: I54f30afb3a9fef1dbca365ca5f98f4cc846092e3
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Thun <philipp.thun@sap.com>
The diff algorithm which is used by Merge, Cherry-Pick, Rebase
should be configurable. A new configuration parameter "diff.algorithm"
is introduced which currently accepts the values "myers" or
"histogram". Based on this parameter for example the ResolveMerger
will choose a diff algorithm. The reason for this is bug 331078.
This bug shows that JGit is more compatible with C Git when
histogram diff is in place. But since histogram diff is quite new we
need an easy way to fall back to Myers diff.
Bug: 331078
Change-Id: I2549c992e478d991c61c9508ad826d1a9e539ae3
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Thun <philipp.thun@sap.com>
The automatically generated commit message of a merge should have the
same structure as in C Git for consistency (as per git fmt-merge-msg).
Before this change:
merging refs/heads/a into refs/heads/master
After:
Merge branch 'a'
Plurals, "into" and joining by "," and "and" also work.
Change-Id: I9658ce2817adc90d2df1060e8ac508d7bd0571cb
JGit merge algorithm behaved differently from C Git when
we had adjacent modifications. If line 9 was modified by
OURS and line 10 by theirs then C Git will return a
conflict while JGit was seeing this as independent
modifications. This change is not only there to achieve
compatibility, but there where also some really wrong
merge results produced by JGit in the area of adjacent
modifications.
Change-Id: I8d77cb59e82638214e45b3cf9ce3a1f1e9b35c70
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Introduced similar helper methods than in AbstractDiffTestCase.
Then the test cases are much smaller and better understandable.
Change-Id: I2beb4db5a93bd8c0c1238d5d3039cbd6719eee90
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
As described in Bug 328551 there was a bug that the merge algorithm
was not always reporting conflicts when the same line was deleted
and modified. This problem was introduced during commit
0c017188b4 when reported conflicts have
been checked for common pre- and suffixes.
This was fixed here by better determining whether after stripping
off common prefixes and suffixes from a conflicting region there
is still some conflicting part left.
I also added a unit test to test this situation.
Bug: 328551
Change-Id: Iec6c9055d00e5049938484a27ab98dda2577afc4
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Instead of making the sequence itself responsible for the equivalence
function, use an external function that is supplied by the caller.
This cleans up the code because we now say cmp.equals(a, ai, b, bi)
instead of a.equals(ai, b, bi).
This refactoring also removes the odd concept of creating different
types of sequences to have different behaviors for whitespace
ignoring. Instead DiffComparator now supports singleton functions
that apply a particular equivalence algorithm to a type of sequence.
Change-Id: I559f494d81cdc6f06bfb4208f60780c0ae251df9
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Improve MergeAlgorithm to produce smaller conflicts
The merge algorithm was reporting conflicts which where to big.
Example: The common base was "ABC", the "ours" version contained
"AB1C" (the addition of "1" after pos 2) and the "theirs" version also
contained "AB1C". We have two potentially conflicting edits in the
same region which happen to bring in exactly the same content. This
should not be a conflict - but was previously reported as
"AB<<<1===1>>>C".
This is fixed by checking every conflicting chunk whether the
conflicting regions have a common prefix or suffix and by removing
this regions from the conflict.
Change-Id: I4dc169b8ef7a66ec6b307e9a956feef906c9e15e
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Move commit and tag formatting to CommitBuilder, TagBuilder
These objects should be responsible for their own formatting,
rather than delegating it to some obtuse type called ObjectInserter.
While we are at it, simplify the way we insert these into a database.
Passing in the type and calling format in application code turned
out to be a huge mistake in terms of ease-of-use of the insert API.
Change-Id: Id5bb95ee56aa2a002243e9b7853b84ec8df1d7bf
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
David Pursehouse
Masaya Suzuki
Shawn Pearce
David Pursehouse
Jonathan Nieder
Christian Halstrick
Matthias Sohn
André de Oliveira
Robin Rosenberg
Shawn Pearce
George C. Young
Stefan Lay
Robin Stocker
Markus Duft
Tomasz Zarna