Revert "Extract path info from requests without decoding"
This reverts commit 19f869996f.
Leaving path info encoded confuses applications like Gitiles.
Trying to fix this inside of JGit was maybe the wrong solution.
Change-Id: I8df9ab6233ff513e427701c8a1a66022c19784eb
Gitiles malfunctions in conjunction with jgit and guice
because of a recent Guice bug fix. Work around the problem
by parsing the URI directly, bypassing the unescaping
performed by the getPathInfo method.
This rest of this message is copied from
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/60820/ :
The fix for Guice issue #745[1] causes getPathInfo() within the
GuiceFilter to return decoded values, eliminating the difference
between "foo/bar" and "foo%2Fbar". This is in spec with the servlet
standard, whose javadoc for getPathInfo[2] states that the return
value be "decoded by the web container".
Work around this by extracting the path part directly from the request
URI, which is unmodified by the container. This is copying the Guice
behavior prior to the bugfix.
[1] https://github.com/google/guice/issues/745
[2] http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/javax/servlet/http/HttpServletRequest.html#getPathInfo()
Change-Id: I7fdb291bda377dab6160599ee537962d5f60f1e8
Signed-off-by: David Pletcher <dpletcher@google.com>
I have unfortunately introduced a few bugs in the native Git client
over the years. 1.7.5 is unable to send chunked requests correctly,
resulting in corrupt data at the server. Ban this client whenever
it uses chunked encoding with an error message.
Prior to some more recent versions, git push over HTTP failed to
report status information and error messages due to a race within
the client and its helper process. Check for these bad versions and
send errors as messages before the status report, enabling users
to see the failures on their terminal.
Change-Id: Ic62d6591cbd851d21dbb3e9b023d655eaecb0624
This never should have been in the core library test suite, as that
test suite never should depend upon the HTTP server module.
Change-Id: Ie0528c4d1c755823303d138e327a3a2f4caccc32
Some clients coming through proxies may advertise a different
Accept-Encoding, for example "Accept-Encoding: gzip(proxy)".
Matching by substring causes us to identify this as a false positive;
that the client understands gzip encoding and will inflate the
response before reading it.
In this particular case however it doesn't. Its the reverse proxy
server in front of JGit letting us know the proxy<->JGit link can
be gzip compressed, while the client<->proxy part of the link is not:
client <-- no gzip --> proxy <-- gzip --> JGit
Use a more standard method of parsing by splitting the value into
tokens, and only using gzip if one of the tokens is exactly the
string "gzip". Add a unit test to make sure this isn't broken in
the future.
Change-Id: Ib4c40f9db177322c7a2640808a6c10b3c4a73819
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Some clients coming through proxies may advertise a different
Accept-Encoding, for example "Accept-Encoding: gzip(proxy)".
Matching by substring causes us to identify this as a false positive;
that the client understands gzip encoding and will inflate the
response before reading it.
In this particular case however it doesn't. Its the reverse proxy
server in front of JGit letting us know the proxy<->JGit link can
be gzip compressed, while the client<->proxy part of the link is not:
client <-- no gzip --> proxy <-- gzip --> JGit
Use a more standard method of parsing by splitting the value into
tokens, and only using gzip if one of the tokens is exactly the
string "gzip". Add a unit test to make sure this isn't broken in
the future.
Change-Id: I30cda8a6d11ad235b56457adf54a2d27095d964e
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>