Change-Id: I143c242c0e3299323ae166a59947b1195539e6bf
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>

Include the net.i2p.crypto.eddsa bundle via a hard dependency.

Add tests for dealing with ed25519 host keys and user key files.

Manual tests: fetching from git.eclipse.org with an ed25519 user key,
and pushing this change itself using the same ed25519 key.

Note that sshd 2.0.0 does not yet support encrypted ed25519 private
keys.

Bug: 541272
Change-Id: I7072f4014d9eca755b4a2412e19c086235e5eae9
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>

Add tests for password and keyboard-interactive authentication.
Implement password authentication; the default provided by sshd
is non-interactive, which is not useful for JGit.

Make sure the CredentialsProvider gets reset on successive password
retrieval attempts. Otherwise it might always return the same non-
accepted password from a secure storage. (That one was discovered
by actually trying this via EGit; the JGit tests don't catch this.)

Change the default order of authentication mechanisms to prefer
password over keyboard-interactive. This is a mitigation for upstream
bug SSHD-866.[1]

Also include a fix for upstream bug SSHD-867.[2]

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SSHD/issues/SSHD-866
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SSHD/issues/SSHD-867

Bug: 520927
Change-Id: I423e548f06d3b51531016cf08938c8bd7acaa2a9
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>

sshd only asks exactly once for the password. C.f. upstream issue
SSHD-850.[1] So we have to work around this limitation for now.
Once we move to sshd > 2.1.0, this can be simplified somewhat.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-850

Bug: 520927
Change-Id: Id65650228486c5ed30affa9c62eac982e01ae207
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>

By default sshd will use its default built-in list, which matches
the one of openssh (as far as the algorithms exist in sshd at all).
But it doesn't handle HostKeyAlgorithms from the ssh config at all.

Implement this as in openssh, including the '+' and '-' modifiers
and reordering the default if there are known host keys for a
server already.

Add tests for the reordering.

Also use a more robust reader for the known hosts file. The default
aborts on the first error.

Bug: 520927
Change-Id: Ib1684440bfe2e96140536aa1a93c4bd4a0d35916
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>

Tests that it works with unknown authentications in the list, and
fails if there are no common authentications between server and
client. The latter also tests that the ssh config setting is taken
into account at all.

And promptly the JGit sshd client didn't. Add a fix for this. It's
a tiny bit hacky: Apache MINA looks up a custom property set on a
hierarchy of "PropertyResolver"s starting with the session. On the
session itself this property can never be set since it's read
already in the session constructor before anyone had any chance
to set it. The next element in the resolver hierarchy is the sshd
SshClient, and so we set that property there. Since we use one
SshClient and one ClientSession per JGit SshdSession, this is OK.

Bug: 520927
Change-Id: I62446fc1fffde125a8965c030240f0918ae234b7
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>

Add a new ssh client implementation based on Apach MINA sshd 2.0.0.

This implementation uses JGit's own config file parser and host entry
resolver. Code inspection of the Apache MINA implementation revealed
a few bugs or idiosyncrasies that immediately would re-introduce bugs
already fixed in the past in JGit.

Apache MINA sshd is not without quirks either, and I had to configure
and override more than I had expected. But at least it was all doable
in clean ways.

Apache MINA boasts support for Bouncy Castle, so in theory this should
open the way to using more ssh key algorithms, such as ed25519.

The implementation is in a separate bundle and is still not used in
the core org.eclipse.jgit bundle. The tests re-use the ssh tests from
the core test bundle.

Bug: 520927
Change-Id: Ib35e73c35799140fe050d1ff4fb18d0d3596580e
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>

On recent VMs, collection.toArray(new T[0]) is faster than
collection.toArray(new T[collection.size()]). Since it is also more
readable, it should now be the preferred way of collection to array
conversion.

https://shipilev.net/blog/2016/arrays-wisdom-ancients/

Change-Id: I80388532fb4b2b0663ee1fe8baa94f5df55c8442
Signed-off-by: Michael Keppler <Michael.Keppler@gmx.de>

Currently there is no way to determine the precise changes done
to the working tree by a JGit command. Only the CheckoutCommand
actually provides access to the lists of modified, deleted, and
to-be-deleted files, but those lists may be inaccurate (since they
are determined up-front before the working tree is modified) if
the actual checkout then fails halfway through. Moreover, other
JGit commands that modify the working tree do not offer any way to
figure out which files were changed.

This poses problems for EGit, which may need to refresh parts of the
Eclipse workspace when JGit has done java.io file operations.

Provide the foundations for better file change tracking: the working
tree is modified exclusively in DirCacheCheckout. Make it emit a new
type of RepositoryEvent that lists all files that were modified or
deleted, even if the checkout failed halfway through. We update the
'updated' and 'removed' lists determined up-front in case of file
system problems to reflect the actual state of changes made.

EGit thus can register a listener for these events and then knows
exactly which parts of the Eclipse workspace may need to be refreshed.

Two commands manage checking out individual DirCacheEntries themselves:
checkout specific paths, and applying a stash with untracked files.
Make those two also emit such a new WorkingTreeModifiedEvent.

Furthermore, merges may modify files, and clean, rm, and stash create
may delete files.

CQ: 13969
Bug: 500106
Change-Id: I7a100aee315791fa1201f43bbad61fbae60b35cb
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>

Since the introduction of generic type parameter inference in Java 7,
it's not necessary to explicitly specify the type of generic parameters.

Enable the warning in Eclipse, and fix all occurrences.

Change-Id: I9158caf1beca5e4980b6240ac401f3868520aad0
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>

This prevents the warning:

  Potential heap pollution via varargs parameter

The method doesn't do any casting of types that would cause the heap
pollution, so it should be safe to add @SafeVarArgs.

See [1] for information about this warning.

[1] http://stackoverflow.com/a/12462259/381622

Change-Id: Ic6d252915ea44b4f1c385afecb98906cd2c54382
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>

A later patch will make use of this class in a org.eclipse.jgit.lib
test.

Change-Id: I2b268e6a5dbf12174201f45259f9f007686708d2
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrn@google.com>