Add a new ssh client implementation based on Apach MINA sshd 2.0.0.

This implementation uses JGit's own config file parser and host entry
resolver. Code inspection of the Apache MINA implementation revealed
a few bugs or idiosyncrasies that immediately would re-introduce bugs
already fixed in the past in JGit.

Apache MINA sshd is not without quirks either, and I had to configure
and override more than I had expected. But at least it was all doable
in clean ways.

Apache MINA boasts support for Bouncy Castle, so in theory this should
open the way to using more ssh key algorithms, such as ed25519.

The implementation is in a separate bundle and is still not used in
the core org.eclipse.jgit bundle. The tests re-use the ssh tests from
the core test bundle.

Bug: 520927
Change-Id: Ib35e73c35799140fe050d1ff4fb18d0d3596580e
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>

Eclipse Photon supports separating sources and test sources.

There are no functional changes in the IDE, except for test source
folders having a different icon color.

Users of different IDEs than Eclipse are not affected, since the
attribute on the classpath entries will be ignored by their IDE.

Bug: 539933
Change-Id: Iac6dcdf0c0730ca775bae90df6a685303dc95380
Signed-off-by: Michael Keppler <Michael.Keppler@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>

Bug: 500059
Change-Id: I47f3f6749a67da52029f84e002d9b155ed56d2b7
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>

Implement LfsProtocolServlet handling the "Git LFS v1 Batch API"
protocol [1]. Add a simple file system based LFS content store and the
debug-lfs-store command to simplify testing.

Introduce a LargeFileRepository interface to enable additional storage
implementation while reusing the same protocol implementation.

At the client side we have to configure the lfs.url, specify that
we use the batch API and we don't use authentication:

  [lfs]
	  url = http://host:port/lfs
	  batch = true
  [lfs "http://host:port/lfs"]
	  access = none

the git-lfs client appends the "objects/batch" to the lfs.url.

Hard code an Authorization header in the FileLfsRepository.getAction
because then git-lfs client will skip asking for credentials. It will
just forward the Authorization header from the response to the
download/upload request.

The FileLfsServlet supports file content storage for "Large File
Storage" (LFS) server as defined by the Github LFS API [2].

- upload and download of large files is probably network bound hence use
  an asynchronous servlet for good scalability
- simple object storage in file system with 2 level fan-out
- use LockFile to protect writing large objects against multiple
  concurrent uploads of the same object
- to prevent corrupt uploads the uploaded file is rejected if its hash
  doesn't match id given in URL

The debug-lfs-store command is used to run the LfsProtocolServlet and,
optionally, the FileLfsServlet which makes it easier to setup a
local test server.

[1]
https://github.com/github/git-lfs/blob/master/docs/api/http-v1-batch.md
[2] https://github.com/github/git-lfs/tree/master/docs/api

Bug: 472961
Change-Id: I7378da5575159d2195138d799704880c5c82d5f3
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasa Zivkov <sasa.zivkov@sap.com>

Bug: 458475
Change-Id: Iea8f2236d4e6a94a8d14bb8cc685006ea3fd1bb7
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>

The Jetty components are not available as part of Eclipse, but a
P2 packaged version can be found via [1] for Eclipse 3.5 and newer.

[1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Jetty-OSGi_SDK

Change-Id: Ibd5930bb9fc9589125876ca50c52e58bd31b051c
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>

This restores the ability to build using just Eclipse without
strange procedures, extra plugins and it is again possible to
work on both JGit and EGit in the same Eclipse workspace with
ease.

Change-Id: I0af08127d507fbce186f428f1cdeff280f0ddcda
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>

Tycho isn't production ready for projects like JGit to be using as
their primary build driver.  Some problems we ran into with Tycho
0.6.0 that are preventing us from using it are:

 * Tycho can't run offline

   The P2 artifact resolver cannot perform its work offline.  If the
   build system has no network connection, it cannot compile a
   project through Tycho.  This is insane for a distributed version
   control system where developers are used to being offline during
   development and local testing.

 * Magic state in ~/.m2/repository/.meta/p2-metadata.properties

   Earlier iterations of this patch tried to use a hybrid build,
   where Tycho was only used for the Eclipse specific feature and P2
   update site, and maven-bundle-plugin was used for the other code.
   This build seemed to work, but only due to magic Tycho specific
   state held in my local home directory.  This means builds are not
   consistently repeatable across systems, and lead me to believe
   I had a valid build, when in fact I did not.

 * Manifest-first build produces incomplete POMs

   The POM created by the manifest-first build format does not
   contain the dependency chain, leading a downstream consumer to
   not import the runtime dependencies necessary to execute the
   bundle it has imported.  In JGit's case, this means JSch isn't
   included in our dependency chain.

 * Manifest-first build produces POMs unreadable by Maven 2.x

   JGit has existing application consumers who are relying on
   Maven 2.x builds.  Forcing them to step up to an alpha release
   of Maven 3 is simply unacceptable.

 * OSGi bundle export data management is tedious

   Editing each of our pom.xml files to mark a new release is
   difficult enough as it is.  Editing every MANIFEST.MF file to
   list our exported packages and their current version number is
   something a machine should do, not a human.  Yet the Tycho OSGi
   way unfortunately demands that a human do this work.

 * OSGi bundle import data management is tedious

   There isn't a way in the MANIFEST.MF file format to reuse the
   same version tags across all of our imports, but we want to have
   a consistent view of our dependencies when we compile JGit.

After wasting more than 2 full days trying to get Tycho to work,
I've decided its a lost cause right now.  We need to be chasing down
bugs and critical features, not trying to bridge the gap between
the stable Maven repository format and the undocumented P2 format
used only by Eclipse.

So, switch the build to use Apache Felix's maven-bundle-plugin.

This is the same plugin Jetty uses to produce their OSGi bundle
manifests, and is the same plugin used by the Apache Felix project,
which is an open-source OSGi runtime.  It has a reasonable number
of folks using it for production builds, and is running on top of
the stable Maven 2.x code base.

With this switch we get automatically generated MANIFEST.MF files
based on reasonably sane default rules, which reduces the amount
of things we have to maintain by hand.  When necessary, we can add
a few lines of XML to our POMs to tweak the output.

Our build artifacts are still fully compatible with Maven 2.x, so
any downstream consumers are still able to use our build products,
without stepping up to Maven 3.x.  Our artifacts are also valid as
OSGi bundles, provided they are organized on disk into a repository
that the runtime can read.

With maven-bundle-plugin the build runs offline, as much as Maven
2.x is able to run offline anyway, so we're able to return to a
distributed development environment again.

By generating MANIFEST.MF at the top level of each project (and
therefore outside of the target directory), we're still compatible
with Eclipse's PDE tooling.  Our projects can be imported as standard
Maven projects using the m2eclipse plugin, but the PDE will think
they are vaild plugins and make them available for plugin builds,
or while debugging another workbench.

This change also completely removes Tycho from the build.

Unfortunately, Tycho 0.6.0's pom-first dependency resolver is broken
when resolving a pom-first plugin bundle through a manifest-first
feature package, so bundle org.eclipse.jgit can't be resolved,
even though it might actually exist in the local Maven repository.

Rather than fight with Tycho any further, I'm just declaring it
plugina-non-grata and ripping it out of the build.

Since there are very few tools to build a P2 format repository, and
no documentation on how to create one without running the Eclipse
UI manually by poking buttons, I'm declaring that we are not going
to produce a P2 update site from our automated builds.

Change-Id: If7938a86fb0cc8e25099028d832dbd38110b9124
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>

This way we depend upon the MANIFEST.MF to define our classpath
and our build will act more like any other OSGI bundle build.

Change-Id: I9e1f1f5a0bccb0ab0e39e49b75fb400fea446619
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>

This new UI bundle contains the org.eclipse.jgit.awtui package,
which was moved out of the org.eclipse.jgit bundle.

org.eclipse.jgit.pgm depends on org.eclipse.jgit.ui, so we need
to update the classpath and make_jgit.sh to include it.

This move takes the awtui classes out of the Maven build, which
means we are no longer able to distribute these classes to our
downstream Maven customers.  The entire Maven package structure
needs to be overhauled so that Eclipse bundle matches 1:1 with the
Maven artifact.

Bug: https://bugs.eclipse.org/291124
Change-Id: Ibf1a9968387e3d11fdce54592f710ec4cc7f1ddb
Signed-off-by: Mykola Nikishov <mn@mn.com.ua>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>

All 3rd party dependencies must come from orbit to comply
with Eclipse development process.

Change-Id: Ia43892ab6d0169f8335c1a41b37e8c12e94cafe2
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>

Per CQ 3448 this is the initial contribution of the JGit project
to eclipse.org.  It is derived from the historical JGit repository
at commit 3a2dd9921c.

Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>