Lazily open ReadableChannel in BlockBasedFile.getOrLoadBlock
To avoid opening the readable channel in case of DfsBlockCache
hits. Also cleaning up typos around DfsBlockCache.
Change-Id: I615e349cb4838387c1e6743cdc384d1b81b54369
Signed-off-by: Minh Thai <mthai@google.com>
DfsBlockCache to lock while loading object references
We see the same index being loaded by multiple threads. Each is
hundreds of MB and takes several seconds to load, causing server to
run out of memory. This change introduces a lock to avoid these
duplicate works. It uses a new set of locks similar in implementation
to the loadLocks for getOrLoad of blocks. The locks are kept separate
to prevent long-running index loading from blocking out fast block
loading. The cache instance can be configured with a consumer to
monitor the wait time of the new locks.
Change-Id: I44962fe84093456962d5981545e3f7851ecb6e43
Signed-off-by: Minh Thai <mthai@google.com>
These packages don't use @since tags because they are not part of the
stable public API. Some @since tags snuck in, though. Remove them to
make the convention easier to find for new contributors and the
expectations clearer for users.
Change-Id: I6c17d3cfc93657f1b33cf5c5708f2b1c712b0d31
Check that DfsBlockCache#blockSize is a power of 2
In case a value is used which isn’t a power of 2 there will be a high
chance of java.lang.ArrayIndexOutBoundsException and
org.eclipse.jgit.errors.CorruptObjectException due to a mismatching
assumption for the DfsBlockCache#blockSizeShift parameter.
Change-Id: Ib348b3704edf10b5f93a3ffab4fa6f09cbbae231
Signed-off-by: Philipp Marx <smigfu@googlemail.com>
Allow for higher concurrency on DfsBlockCache by adding a configuration
for number of estimated concurrent requests.
Change-Id: Ia65e58ecb2c459b6d9c9697a2f715d933270f7e6
Signed-off-by: Philipp Marx <smigfu@googlemail.com>
Avoid storing large packs in block cache during reuse
When a large pack (> 30% of the block cache) is being reused by
copying it pollutes the block cache with noise by storing blocks
that are never referenced again.
Avoid this by streaming the file directly from its channel onto
the output stream.
Change-Id: I2e53de27f3dcfb93de68b1fad45f75ab23e79fe7
This implementation has been proven to deadlock in production server
loads. Google has been running with it disabled for a quite a while,
as the bugs have been difficult to identify and fix.
Instead of suggesting it works and is useful, drop the code. JGit
should not advertise support for functionality that is known to
be broken.
In a few of the places where read-ahead was enabled by DfsReader
there is more information about what blocks should be loaded when.
During object representation selection, or size lookup, or sending
object as-is to a PackWriter, or sending an entire pack as-is the
reader knows exactly which blocks are required in the cache, and it
also can compute when those will be needed. The broken read-ahead
code was stupid and just read a fixed amount ahead of the current
offset, which can waste IOs if more precise data was available.
DFS systems are usually slow to respond so read-ahead is still
a desired feature, but it needs to be rebuilt from scratch and
make better use of the offset information.
Change-Id: Ibaed8288ec3340cf93eb269dc0f1f23ab5ab1aea
JGit 3.0: move internal classes into an internal subpackage
This breaks all existing callers once. Applications are not supposed
to build against the internal storage API unless they can accept API
churn and make necessary updates as versions change.
Change-Id: I2ab1327c202ef2003565e1b0770a583970e432e9
A few classes such as Constanrs are marked with @SuppressWarnings, as are
toString() methods with many liternal, but otherwise $NLS-n$ is used for
string containing text that should not be translated. A few literals may
fall into the gray zone, but mostly I've tried to only tag the obvious
ones.
Change-Id: I22e50a77e2bf9e0b842a66bdf674e8fa1692f590
In practice the DHT storage layer has not been performing as well as
large scale server environments want to see from a Git server.
The performance of the DHT schema degrades rapidly as small changes
are pushed into the repository due to the chunk size being less than
1/3 of the pushed pack size. Small chunks cause poor prefetch
performance during reading, and require significantly longer prefetch
lists inside of the chunk meta field to work around the small size.
The DHT code is very complex (>17,000 lines of code) and is very
sensitive to the underlying database round-trip time, as well as the
way objects were written into the pack stream that was chunked and
stored on the database. A poor pack layout (from any version of C Git
prior to Junio reworking it) can cause the DHT code to be unable to
enumerate the objects of the linux-2.6 repository in a completable
time scale.
Performing a clone from a DHT stored repository of 2 million objects
takes 2 million row lookups in the DHT to locate the OBJECT_INDEX row
for each object being cloned. This is very difficult for some DHTs to
scale, even at 5000 rows/second the lookup stage alone takes 6 minutes
(on local filesystem, this is almost too fast to bother measuring).
Some servers like Apache Cassandra just fall over and cannot complete
the 2 million lookups in rapid fire.
On a ~400 MiB repository, the DHT schema has an extra 25 MiB of
redundant data that gets downloaded to the JGit process, and that is
before you consider the cost of the OBJECT_INDEX table also being
fully loaded, which is at least 223 MiB of data for the linux kernel
repository. In the DHT schema answering a `git clone` of the ~400 MiB
linux kernel needs to load 248 MiB of "index" data from the DHT, in
addition to the ~400 MiB of pack data that gets sent to the client.
This is 193 MiB more data to be accessed than the native filesystem
format, but it needs to come over a much smaller pipe (local Ethernet
typically) than the local SATA disk drive.
I also never got around to writing the "repack" support for the DHT
schema, as it turns out to be fairly complex to safely repack data in
the repository while also trying to minimize the amount of changes
made to the database, due to very common limitations on database
mutation rates..
This new DFS storage layer fixes a lot of those issues by taking the
simple approach for storing relatively standard Git pack and index
files on an abstract filesystem. Packs are accessed by an in-process
buffer cache, similar to the WindowCache used by the local filesystem
storage layer. Unlike the local file IO, there are some assumptions
that the storage system has relatively high latency and no concept of
"file handles". Instead it looks at the file more like HTTP byte range
requests, where a read channel is a simply a thunk to trigger a read
request over the network.
The DFS code in this change is still abstract, it does not store on
any particular filesystem, but is fairly well suited to the Amazon S3
or Apache Hadoop HDFS. Storing packs directly on HDFS rather than
HBase removes a layer of abstraction, as most HBase row reads turn
into an HDFS read.
Most of the DFS code in this change was blatently copied from the
local filesystem code. Most parts should be refactored to be shared
between the two storage systems, but right now I am hesistent to do
this due to how well tuned the local filesystem code currently is.
Change-Id: Iec524abdf172e9ec5485d6c88ca6512cd8a6eafb