Update to the latest 9.3 version until we have a solution for bug 514336
we face with 9.4.x versions.

Change-Id: I6d8d476abe8677ce865a08099bb77330effc700a
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>

This reverts commit d3b80b951c.

Change-Id: I596ba596f3e857346020e01b0a018d90a0b27edd

In I3ab958ce8 explicit dependency in lib/BUILD were defined and most
of the bazel build implementation was switched to using it. Switch
test.bzl test implementation to using explicit dependencies as well.

Change-Id: I4413d1a45addeeb2a980d07669fa034c2eebb3a4
Signed-off-by: David Ostrovsky <david@ostrovsky.org>

Buck will be replaced with Bazel

Change-Id: I3cf07d7aaaa2a58bac34e16c50af5416693254ac
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>

Add bazel build for ui and junit.http, and the test packages.

A number of different test labels are supported:

  api
  attributes
  dfs
  diff
  http
  lfs
  lfs-server
  nls
  notes
  pack
  patch
  pgm
  reftree
  revplot
  revwalk
  storage
  submodule
  symlinks
  transport
  treewalk
  util

To run all tests:

  bazel test //...

To run specific tests, using labels:

  bazel test --test_tag_filters=api,dfs,revplot,treewalk //...

Change-Id: Ic41b05a79d855212e67b1b4707e9c6b4dc9ea70d
Signed-off-by: David Ostrovsky <david@ostrovsky.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrn@google.com>

Only testonly targets (such as tests) need to use junit.

In particular this involves making the toplevel :all rule testonly.
It's not clear to me what that rule is for --- "bazel build //..."
already works to build all targets.  In any case it appears to be for
testing, so marking it as testonly shouldn't be harmful.

Change-Id: I28ff508ab8ce2ec0a0111109110aa9680d30600e

This provides a place to declare visibility restrictions and
transitive dependencies for each library.

Other targets should only declare dependencies on what they directly
use, making dependencies easier to maintain.

Trim the dependencies of org.eclipse.jgit:jgit to follow that rule.
It declares dependencies on Apache httpcomponents and the servlet
API but doesn't use them.

Tested:
* 'bazel build //...' succeeds
* applying the change https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/90843
  to a copy of Gerrit, following the instructions there, and running
  'bazel test //...' in that copy of Gerrit still succeeds

Change-Id: I3ab958ce8b3227019cdbe4cc81e0f042e1541034

5e8e2179b2 (Update Jetty to
9.4.1.v201470120, 2017-01-26) updated Jetty in the maven build.
Update the buck build to match so buck builds work again.

The buck build will go away soon, but in the meantime (until the bazel
build gets the same level of support) it is convenient as a faster way
of running tests than using maven.

The bazel build doesn't need this change since it doesn't build or run
http tests yet.

Change-Id: Ibbdaf2880e76b32fc9f6b5605a2ff29e3deffda2
(cherry picked from commit 2470f01d0f)

5e8e2179b2 (Update Jetty to
9.4.1.v201470120, 2017-01-26) updated Jetty in the maven build.
Update the buck build to match so buck builds work again.

The buck build will go away soon, but in the meantime (until the bazel
build gets the same level of support) it is convenient as a faster way
of running tests than using maven.

The bazel build doesn't need this change since it doesn't build or run
http tests yet.

Change-Id: Ibbdaf2880e76b32fc9f6b5605a2ff29e3deffda2

Use Oxygen M3 Orbit repository which provides the bundles built using
the new orbit-recipe based build.

CQ: 11658
Change-Id: I7f3dcc966732b32830c75d5daa55383bd028d182
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>

Implement LfsProtocolServlet handling the "Git LFS v1 Batch API"
protocol [1]. Add a simple file system based LFS content store and the
debug-lfs-store command to simplify testing.

Introduce a LargeFileRepository interface to enable additional storage
implementation while reusing the same protocol implementation.

At the client side we have to configure the lfs.url, specify that
we use the batch API and we don't use authentication:

  [lfs]
	  url = http://host:port/lfs
	  batch = true
  [lfs "http://host:port/lfs"]
	  access = none

the git-lfs client appends the "objects/batch" to the lfs.url.

Hard code an Authorization header in the FileLfsRepository.getAction
because then git-lfs client will skip asking for credentials. It will
just forward the Authorization header from the response to the
download/upload request.

The FileLfsServlet supports file content storage for "Large File
Storage" (LFS) server as defined by the Github LFS API [2].

- upload and download of large files is probably network bound hence use
  an asynchronous servlet for good scalability
- simple object storage in file system with 2 level fan-out
- use LockFile to protect writing large objects against multiple
  concurrent uploads of the same object
- to prevent corrupt uploads the uploaded file is rejected if its hash
  doesn't match id given in URL

The debug-lfs-store command is used to run the LfsProtocolServlet and,
optionally, the FileLfsServlet which makes it easier to setup a
local test server.

[1]
https://github.com/github/git-lfs/blob/master/docs/api/http-v1-batch.md
[2] https://github.com/github/git-lfs/tree/master/docs/api

Bug: 472961
Change-Id: I7378da5575159d2195138d799704880c5c82d5f3
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasa Zivkov <sasa.zivkov@sap.com>

Running tests using buck reveals that HttpClientTests are broken
and weren't executed by Maven since these test classes don't match the
maven-surefire-plugin's default for test classes **/*Test.java.
Will be fixed in a follow-up change.

Change-Id: I82a01b5fd3f0a930bec2423a29a256601dadc248
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>

Compile each test in its own java_test() target so they can run in
parallel, reducing total time spent testing on large machines.

$ buck test --all
[-] PROCESSING BUCK FILES...FINISHED 0.3s [100%]
[-] BUILDING...FINISHED 2.9s [100%] (351/383 JOBS, 351 UPDATED, 0.0% CACHE MISS)
[-] TESTING...FINISHED 98.1s (3360 PASS/15 SKIP/0 FAIL)

Change-Id: I8d6541268315089299f933ed23d785b1b3431133

Construct the java_application JAR wrapped with the shell script
header.  This is enough to clone a repository over HTTPs:

  $ buck build :jgit_bin
  $ buck-out/gen/jgit_bin/jgit_bin clone https://...

Change-Id: I4aceb4e77b2ec9be76a32ec93d94f2dafe9acce6

Today there are plenty of modern build tool systems available in the
wild (in no particular order):

* http://bazel.io
* https://pantsbuild.github.io
* http://shakebuild.com
* https://ninja-build.org
* https://buckbuild.com

The attributes, that all these build tools have in common, are:

* reliable
* correct
* very fast
* reproducible

It must not always be the other build tool, this project is currently
using. Or, quoting Gerrit Code Review maintainer here:

  "Friends, don't let friends use <the other build tool system>!"

This change is non-complete implementation of JGit build in Buck,
needed by Gerrit Code Review to replace its dependency with standlone
JGit cell. This is very useful when a developer is working on both
projects and is trying to integrate changes made in JGit in Gerrit.

The supported workflow is:

  $ cd jgit
  $ emacs <hack>
  $ cd ../gerrit
  $ buck build --config repositories.jgit=../jgit gerrit

With --config repositories.jgit=../jgit jgit cell is routed through
JGit development tree.

To build jgit, issue:

  $ buck build //:jgit
  [-] PROCESSING BUCK FILES...FINISHED 0,0s

Yes, you can't measure no-op build time, given that Buck daemon is
used.

Change-Id: I301a71b19fba35a5093d8cc64d4ba970c2877a44
Signed-off-by: David Ostrovsky <david@ostrovsky.org>