DiffFormatter: correctly deal with tracked files in ignored folders
In JGit 5.0, the FileTreeIterator was changed to skip ignored folders
by default. To catch tracked files inside ignored folders, the tree
walk needs to have a DirCacheIterator, and the FileTreeIterator has
to know about that DirCacheIterator via setDirCacheIterator(). (Or
the optimization has to be switched off explicitly via
setWalkIgnoredDirectories(true).)
Skipping ignored directories is an important optimization in some
cases, for instance in node.js/npm projects, where we'd otherwise
traverse the whole huge and deep hierarchy of the typically ignored
node_modules folder.
While all uses of WorkingTreeIterator in JGit had been adapted,
DiffFormatter was forgotten. To make it work correctly (again) also
for such cases, make it set up a WorkingTreeeIterator automatically,
and make sure the WorkingTreeSource can find such files, too. Also
pass the repository to the TreeWalks used inside the DiffFormatter
to pick up the correct attributes, filters, and line-ending settings.
Bug: 565081
Change-Id: Ie88ac81166dc396ba28b83313964c1712b6ca199
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>
Fix DiffFormatter for diffs against working tree with autocrlf=true
The WorkingTreeSource produced an ObjectLoader that returned
inconsistent sizes: the file size in getSize(), but then a
correctly filtered smaller stream in openStream(). This resulted
either in an IOE "short read of block" or in an EOFException
depending on the resulting filtered size.
Fix this by ensuring that getSize() does return the size of the
filtered stream.
Bug: 530106
Change-Id: I7c7c85036047dc10030ed29c1d5a6c7f34f2bdff
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>
When attempting to determine the size of a blob that does not exist,
the RenameDetector throws a MissingObjectException.
The fix is to return a size of zero if the size is requested for a blob
id that doesn't exist.
Bug: 481577
Change-Id: I4e86276039c630617610cc51d0eefa56d7d3952f
Signed-off-by: Rüdiger Herrmann <ruediger.herrmann@gmx.de>
[performance] Remove synthetic access$ methods in dfs, diff and merge
Java compiler must generate synthetic access methods for private methods
and fields of the enclosing class if they are accessed from inner
classes and vice versa.
While invisible in the code, those synthetic access methods exist in the
bytecode and seem to produce some extra execution overhead at runtime
(compared with the direct access to this fields or methods), see
https://git.eclipse.org/r/58948/.
By removing the "private" access modifier from affected methods and
fields we help compiler to avoid generation of synthetic access methods
and hope to improve execution performance.
To validate changes, one can either use javap or use Bytecode Outline
plugin in Eclipse. In both cases one should look for "synthetic
access$<number>" methods at the end of the class and inner class files
in question - there should be none.
NB: don't mix this "synthetic access$" methods up with "public synthetic
bridge" methods generated to allow generic method override return types.
Change-Id: I94fb481b68c84841c1db1a5ebe678b13e13c962b
Signed-off-by: Andrey Loskutov <loskutov@gmx.de>
Content length is computed and cached (short term) in the working
tree iterator when core.autocrlf is set.
Hopefully this is a cleaner fix than my previous attempt to make
autocrlf work.
Change-Id: I1b6bbb643101a00db94e5514b5e2b069f338907a
If the iterators passed into a diff formatter are working tree
iterators, we should enable ignoring files that are ignored, as
well as actually pull up the current content from the working tree
rather than getting it from the repository.
Because we abstract away the working directory access logic,
we can now actually support rename detection between the working
directory and the local repository when using a DiffFormatter.
This means its possible for an application to show an unstaged
delete-add pair as a rename if the add path is not ignored.
(Because the ignored file wouldn't show up in our difference output.)
Even more interesting is we can now do rename detection between any
two working trees, if both input iterators are WorkingTreeIterators.
Unfortunately we don't (yet) optimize for comparing the working
tree with the index involved so we can take advantage of cached
stat data to rule out non-dirty paths.
Change-Id: I4c0598afe48d8f99257266bf447a0ecd23ca7f5e
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>