Update tests to record the number of events fired post-setup and only
assert for events fired during BatchRefUpdate.execute. For tests which
use writeLooseRef to setup refs, create new tests which assert the
number of RefsChangedEvent(s) rather than updating the existing ones
to call RefDirectory.exactRef as it changes the code path.
Change-Id: I0187811628d179d9c7e874c9bb8a7ddb44dd9df4
Signed-off-by: Kaushik Lingarkar <quic_kaushikl@quicinc.com>
BatchRefUpdate: repro racy atomic update, and fix it
PackedBatchRefUpdate was creating a new packed-refs list that was
potentially unsorted. This would be papered over when the list was
read back from disk in parsePackedRef, which detects unsorted ref
lists on reading, and sorts them. However, the BatchRefUpdate also
installed the new (unsorted) list in-memory in
RefDirectory#packedRefs.
With the timestamp granularity code committed to stable-5.1, we can
more often accurately decide that the packed-refs file is clean, and
will return the erroneous unsorted data more often. Unluckily timed
delays also cause the file to be clean, hence this problem was
exacerbated under load.
The symptom is that refs added by a BatchRefUpdate would stop being
visible directly after they were added. In particular, the Gerrit
integration tests uses BatchRefUpdate in its setup for creating the
Admin group, and then tries to read it out directly afterward.
The tests recreates one failure case. A better approach would be to
revise RefList.Builder, so it detects out-of-order lists and
automatically sorts them.
Fixes https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=548716 and
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/gerrit/issues/detail?id=11373.
Bug: 548716
Change-Id: I613c8059964513ce2370543620725b540b3cb6d1
Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Support force writing reflog on a per-update basis
Even if a repository has core.logAllRefUpdates=true, ReflogWriter does
not create reflog files unless the refs are under a hard-coded list of
prefixes, or unless the forceWrite bit is set. Expose the forceWrite bit
on a per-update basis in RefUpdate/BatchRefUpdate/ReceiveCommand,
creating RefLogWriters as necessary.
Change-Id: Ifc851fba00f76bf56d4134f821d0576b37810f80
Fix missing RefsChangedEvent when packed refs are used
With atomic ref updates using packed refs, JGit did not fire a
RefsChangedEvent. This resulted in a user-visible regression in
EGit: the UI would not update after a "Fetch from upstream...".
Presumably it would also make Gerrit miss out on ref changes?
Strengthen the BatchRefUpdateTest by also asserting the expected
number of RefsChangedEvents, and ensure modCnt is incremented in
RefDirectory.commitPackedRefs() when refs really changed (as opposed
to some internal housekeeping operation, such as packing loose refs).
Bug: 521296
Change-Id: Ia985bda1d99f45a5f89c8020ca4845e7a66e743e
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>
RefDirectory: Add in-process fair lock for atomic updates
In a server scenario such as Gerrit Code Review, there may be many
atomic BatchRefUpdates contending for locks on both the packed-refs file
and some subset of loose refs. We already retry lock acquisition to
improve this situation slightly, but we can do better by using an
in-process lock. This way, instead of retrying and potentially exceeding
their timeout, different threads sharing the same Repository instance
can wait on a fair lock without having to touch the disk lock. Since a
server is probably already using RepositoryCache anyway, there is a high
likelihood of reusing the Repository instance.
Change-Id: If5dd1dc58f0ce62f26131fd5965a0e21a80e8bd3
RefDirectory: Retry acquiring ref locks with backoff
If a repo frequently uses PackedBatchRefUpdates, there is likely to be
contention on the packed-refs file, so it's not appropriate to fail
immediately the first time we fail to acquire a lock. Add some logic to
RefDirectory to support general retrying of lock acquisition.
Currently, there is a hard-coded wait starting at 100ms and backing off
exponentially to 1600ms, for about 3s of total wait. This is no worse
than the hard-coded backoff that JGit does elsewhere, e.g. in
FileUtils#delete. One can imagine a scheme that uses per-repository
configuration of backoff, and the current interface would support this
without changing any callers.
Change-Id: I4764e11270d9336882483eb698f67a78a401c251
On-disk reflogs are not stored in the packed-refs file, so we cannot
ensure atomic updates. We choose the lesser evil of dropping failed
reflog updates on the floor, rather than throwing an exception even
though the underlying ref updates succeeded.
Add tests for reflogs to BatchRefUpdateTest.
Change-Id: Ia456ba9e36af8e01fde81b19af46a72378e614cd
* Factor out helpers for setting up and executing updates.
* Use common assert methods, with a special enum type that papers over
the fact that there is no ReceiveCommand.Result for transaction
aborted.
* Static import ReceiveCommand.Type constants.
* Add blank lines to separate repo setup, update execution, and asserts.
Change-Id: Ic3717f94331abfc7ae3e92065f3fe32026bf7cea
Run with @Parameterized, so we don't have to duplicate test setup for
each atomic/non-atomic test. We still have to have two different sets of
asserts for the cases where the behavior is different. In fact, this is
a readability win: it emphasizes that performing the exact same setup
except for the atomic setting will have different behavior.
Change-Id: I78a8214075e204732a423341f14c09de273a7854