When run under Buck the repository paths may be relative.  Request
an absolute path to construct the URI, as relative paths are not
supported in file:// style URIs.

Change-Id: I85470d1db2f4e80cba30f1559c0d99bdfa8ac410

Change-Id: Ib6ee3a2874a7e2240aa68f4ac32d00c4d1fab5ae
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <zx@twitter.com>

This breaks all existing callers once. Applications are not supposed
to build against the internal storage API unless they can accept API
churn and make necessary updates as versions change.

Change-Id: I2ab1327c202ef2003565e1b0770a583970e432e9

Change-Id: Iedb54eb9d8396bc3ae66d8754c1527fd9ca655f9

Change-Id: I83ca25fb569c0dbc36eb374d5437fcf2b65a6f68

Bug: 394501
Change-Id: I697e2fc82a46c03762111eb1de93e673a2643b4f
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <zx@twitter.com>

That is the common style and yields better diagnostics on failure.

Change-Id: I831a55615a812734af0912a5d6bbfd1edc75308e

On conflicts in rebase or cherry-pick, the conflict markers were like
this:

    <<<<<<< OURS
    a
    =======
    b
    >>>>>>> THEIRS

This is technically correct, but it could be better.

It's especially confusing during a rebase, where the meaning of
OURS/THEIRS is not obvious. The intuition is that "ours" is the commits
that "I" did before the rebase, but it's the other way around because of
the way rebase works. See various bug reports and stackoverflow
discussions.

With this change, in the case of a cherry-pick while on master, the
markers will be like this:

    <<<<<<< master
    a
    =======
    b
    >>>>>>> bad1dea Message of the commit I'm cherry-picking

In the case of a "git rebase master":

    <<<<<<< Upstream, based on master
    a
    =======
    b
    >>>>>>> b161dea Message of a commit I'm rebasing

It's not "master" because that would only be correct for the first
cherry-pick during a rebase, after that, it's master + already
cherry-picked commits.

And in the case of a "git pull --rebase":

    <<<<<<< Upstream, based on branch 'master' of git@example.org:repo
    a
    =======
    b
    >>>>>>> b161dea Message of a commit I'm rebasing

Bug: 336819
Change-Id: I1333a8dd170bb0077f491962013485efb6f2a926
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>

Bug: 344779
Change-Id: I1628984479d93665bf4987d6a4ff8e67ad73eb36
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>

After consulting with Christian Halstrick, it turned out that the
handling of rebase during pull was implemented incorrectly.

Change-Id: I40f03409e080cdfeceb21460150f5e02a016e7f4
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kinzler <mathias.kinzler@sap.com>

Rebase must honor the upstream configuration

branch.<branchname>.rebase

Change-Id: Ic94f263d3f47b630ad75bd5412cb4741bb1109ca
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kinzler <mathias.kinzler@sap.com>

When DirCacheCheckout was checking out it was silently
overwriting untracked files. This is only ok if the
files are also ignored. Untracked and not ignored files
should not be overwritten. This fix adds checks for
this situation.
Because this change in the behaviour also broke tests
which expected that a checkout will overwrite untracked
files (PullCommandTest) these tests have to be modified
also.

Bug: 333093
Change-Id: I26806d2108ceb64c51abaa877e11b584bf527fc9
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>

Eclipse has some problem re-running single JUnit tests if
the tests are in Junit 3 format, but the JUnit 4 launcher
is used. This was quite unnecessary and the move was not
completed. We still have no JUnit4 test.

This completes the extermination of JUnit3. Most of the
work was global searce/replace using regular expression,
followed by numerous invocarions of quick-fix and organize
imports and verification that we had the same number of
tests before and after.

- Annotations were introduced.
- All references to JUnit3 classes removed
- Half-good replacement for getting the test name. This was
  needed to make the TestRngs work. The initialization of
  TestRngs was also made lazily since we can not longer find
  out the test name in runtime in the @Before methods.
- Renamed test classes to end with Test, with the exception
  of TestTranslateBundle, which fails from Maven
- Moved JGitTestUtil to the junit support bundle

Change-Id: Iddcd3da6ca927a7be773a9c63ebf8bb2147e2d13
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>

When the Config is changed, it should be saved back to its local
file.  This ensure that a future call to getConfig() won't wipe
out the edits that were just made.

Change-Id: Id46d3f85d1c9b377f63ef861b72824e1aa060eee
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>

When creating a local branch based on another local branch, the
upstream configuration contains "." as origin and the source branch
as "merge". The PullCommand should support this by skipping the
fetch step altogether and use the base branch to merge with.

Change-Id: I260a1771aeeffca5b0161d1494fd63c672ecc2a6
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kinzler <mathias.kinzler@sap.com>

This is the minimal implementation of a "Pull" command. It does not
have any parameters besides the generic progress monitor and timeout.
It works on the currently checked-out branch and assumes that the
configuration contains the keys "branch.<branch name>.remote" and
"branch.<branch name>.merge" to determine the remote configuration
for the fetch and the remote branch name for the merge.

Bug: 303404
Change-Id: I7fe09029996d0cfc09a7d8f097b5d6af1488fa93
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kinzler <mathias.kinzler@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>