When there are conflicts with a recursive merge, the conflicting paths
are stored in unmergedPaths (field in ResolveMerger). Later, when the
MergeResult is constructed in MergeCommand, getBaseCommit is called,
which computes the merge base a second time.
In case of RecursiveMerger, getBaseCommit merges the multiple merge
bases into one. It does this not by creating a new ResolveMerger but
instead calling mergeTrees. The problem with mergeTrees is that at the
end, it checks if unmergedPaths is non-empty and returns false in that
case.
Because unmergedPaths was already non-empty because of the real merge,
it thinks that there were conflicts when computing the merge base again,
when there really were none.
This can be fixed by storing the base commit when computing it and then
returning that instead of computing it a second time.
Note that another possible fix would be to just use a new ResolveMerger
for merging the merge bases instead. This would also remove the need to
remember the old value of dircache, inCore and workingTreeIterator (see
RecursiveMerger#getBaseCommit).
Bug: 419641
Change-Id: Ib2ebf4e177498c22a9098aa225e3cfcf16bbd958
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
Move the set constructor function to a Sets utility class,
allowing the tests to compile in parallel.
Change-Id: Id6fac2533fab8d423f949c892f199af2491a450b
There was a severe bug in CommitCommand which could corrupt
repos. When merging an annotated tag the JGit MergeCommand writes
correctly the ID of the tag (and not the id of the commit the tag was
pointing to) into MERGE_HEAD. Native git does the same. But
CommitCommand was reading this file and trusting blindly that it will
contain only IDs of commits. Then the CommitCommand created a
commit which has as parent a non-commit object (the tag object). That's
so corrupt that even native git gives up when you call "git log" in
such a repo.
To reproduce that with EGit simply right-click on a tag in the
Repository View and select Merge. The result was a corrupt repo!
Bug: 336291
Change-Id: I24cd5de19ce6ca7b68b4052c9e73dcc6d207b57c
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Added also tests and the associated option for the command line Merge
command.
Bug: 335091
Change-Id: Ie321c572284a6f64765a81674089fc408a10d059
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Fix order of deletion for files/dirs in ResolveMerger
Before, the paths to delete were stored in a HashMap, which doesn't have
a particular order. So when e.g. both the file "a/b" and the directory
"a" were to be deleted, it would sometimes try to delete "a" first. This
resulted in a failed path because File#delete() fails when a directory
isn't empty.
With this change, an ArrayList is used for storing the paths to delete.
The list contains the paths in a top-down order, as defined by the order
of processEntry. When the files are deleted, the list is iterated in
reverse, ensuring that all files of a directory are deleted before the
directory itself.
Bug: 354099
Change-Id: I6b2ce96b3932ca84ecdfbeab457ce823c95433fb
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
Fix ResolveMerger not to add paths with FileMode 0
When ResolveMerger finds a path where it has to do a content merge it
will try the content merge and if that succeeds it'll add the newly
produced content to the index. For the FileMode of this new index entry
it blindly copies the FileMode it finds for that path in the common base
tree. If by chance the common base tree does not contain this path it'll
try to add FileMode 0 (MISSING) to the index.
One could argue that this can't happen: how can the ResolveMerger
successfully (with no conflicts) merge two contents if there is no
common base? This was due to another bug in ResolveMerger. It failed to
find out that for two files which differ only in the FileMode (e.g. 644
vs. 755) it should not try a content merge.
Change-Id: I7a00fe1a6c610679be475cab8a3f8aa4c08811a1
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
Test the reflog message for commit, cherry-pick, revert and merge
Change-Id: I319f09577b3e04f6c31399fe8e57e9a9ad2c8a6c
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Test was added which reproduce the ClassCastException when ours or
theirs merge strategy is set to MergeCommand. Merger and MergeCommand
were updated in order to avoid exception.
Change-Id: I4c1284b4e80d82638d0677a05e5d38182526d196
Signed-off-by: Denys Digtiar <duemir@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>
Change Ia2ab4f8dc95020f2914ff01c2bf3b1bc62a9d45d added merge
support for when OURS or THEIRS was simultaneously deleted
and modified. That changeset however did not add create an
entry in the conflicts table so clients would see a CONFLICTING
result but getConflicts() would return null.
This change creates a MergeResult for the conflicting file.
Bug: 345684
Change-Id: I52acb81c1729b49c9fb3e7a477c6448d8e55c317
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>
Implemented merge for parallel delete/modification
Duplicates cgit behaviour for merging the case where
OURS is deleted and THEIRS is modified as well as
OURS is modified and THEIRS id deleted.
Change-Id: Ia2ab4f8dc95020f2914ff01c2bf3b1bc62a9d45d
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>
Add "Conflicts" section to merge message on conflict
The same as with cherry-pick, the commit message of a merge should
include a "Conflicts" section when the merge resulted in conflicts.
Change-Id: I6261dc898262322924af5ca1bef841a654b0df55
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
Add paths causing abnormal merge failures (e.g. due to unstaged
changes) to the MergeResult returned by MergeCommand. This helps
callers to better handle (e.g. present) merge results.
Change-Id: Idb8cf04c5cecfb6a12cb880e16febfc3b9358564
Signed-off-by: Philipp Thun <philipp.thun@sap.com>
This change moves commonly used methods into the RepositoryTestCase
base class.
Change-Id: I56a46c31ee1661c7ce22eb755ab23da8bc9f5da2
Signed-off-by: Philipp Thun <philipp.thun@sap.com>
In case a file needs to be checked out (from THEIRS) during a merge
operation, it has to be checked if the worktree version of this file
is dirty. If this is true, merge shall fail.
Change-Id: I17c24845584700aad953c3d4f2bea77a0d665ec4
Signed-off-by: Philipp Thun <philipp.thun@sap.com>
1. Perform an explicit check for untracked files.
2. Extract 'dirty checks' into separate methods
3. Clean up comments.
4. Tests: also check contents of files not affected by merge.
Change-Id: Ieb089668834d0a395c9ab192c555538917dfdc47
Signed-off-by: Philipp Thun <philipp.thun@sap.com>
Because of change I28ae5713, the commit message lost the "into HEAD" and
caused the MergeCommandTest to fail. This change fixes it.
Bug: 336059
Change-Id: Ifac0138c6c6d66c40d7295b5e11ff3cd98bc9e0c
Eclipse has some problem re-running single JUnit tests if
the tests are in Junit 3 format, but the JUnit 4 launcher
is used. This was quite unnecessary and the move was not
completed. We still have no JUnit4 test.
This completes the extermination of JUnit3. Most of the
work was global searce/replace using regular expression,
followed by numerous invocarions of quick-fix and organize
imports and verification that we had the same number of
tests before and after.
- Annotations were introduced.
- All references to JUnit3 classes removed
- Half-good replacement for getting the test name. This was
needed to make the TestRngs work. The initialization of
TestRngs was also made lazily since we can not longer find
out the test name in runtime in the @Before methods.
- Renamed test classes to end with Test, with the exception
of TestTranslateBundle, which fails from Maven
- Moved JGitTestUtil to the junit support bundle
Change-Id: Iddcd3da6ca927a7be773a9c63ebf8bb2147e2d13
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
When in OURS and THEIRS a new file is created we want a conflict
when the two contents differ. If on two branches the same file
with the same content is created this should not be a conflict.
But: the current merge algorithm is throwing NPEs in this case.
Fix this by choosing an empty RawText as common base if the
base is empty.
Change-Id: I21cb23f852965b82fb82ccd66ec961c7edb3ac3d
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Fix bug regarding handling of non-versioned files during merge
There was a bug introduced by commit 0e815fe. For non-versioned files
the merge algorithm detected an incoming deletion from THEIRS.
Consequently such files were deleted. That's a severe bug which was
fixed by more precisely detecting incoming deletions.
Change-Id: I4385d3c990db11d62e371a385dc8ee89841db84a
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Thun <philipp.thun@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Test was broken by commit b087bba3 changing formatting of merge
commit messages.
Change-Id: I98b1b936b9b6cbaa50fbc59d243a43e66a6ee9f9
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Fixed ResolveMerger regarding handling of deletions
There was a bug in ResolveMerger which is one reason for
bug 328841. If a merge was failing because of conflicts
deletions where not handled correctly. Files which have
to be deleted (because there was a non-conflicting deletion
coming in from THEIRS) are not deleted. In the
non-conflicting case we also forgot to delete the file but
in this case we explicitly checkout in the end these files
get deleted during that checkout.
This is fixed by handling incoming deletions explicitly.
Bug: 328841
Change-Id: I7f4c94ab54138e1b2f3fcdf34fb803d68e209ad0
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
The JGit merge algorithm or the Merge Command may have problems with handling
deletions always correctly. Therefore one additional test is added to check
this.
Change-Id: Id6aa49136996b29047c340994fe7faba68858e8c
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Create a new 'org.eclipse.jgit.api.errors' package to contain
exceptions related to using the Git porcelain API.
Change-Id: Iac1781bd74fbd520dffac9d347616c3334994470
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>
This adds the first merge strategy to JGit which does real
content-merges if necessary. The new merge strategy "resolve" takes as
input three commits: a common base, ours and theirs. It will simply takeover
changes on files which are only touched in ours or theirs. For files
touched in ours and theirs it will try to merge the two contents
knowing taking into account the specified common base.
Rename detection has not been introduced for now.
Change-Id: I49a5ebcdcf4f540f606092c0f1dc66c965dc66ba
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Lay <stefan.lay@sap.com>
The Commit class now only supports the creation of a commit object.
To read a commit, applictions should use RevCommit. This permits
us to have exactly one implementation, and RevCommit's is faster
and more bug-free.
Change-Id: Ib573f7e15f36855112815269385c21dea532e2cf
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This better matches with the name used in the environment
(GIT_WORK_TREE), in the configuration file (core.worktree),
and in our builder object.
Since we are already breaking a good chunk of other code
related to repository access, and this fairly easy to fix
in an application's code base, I'm not going to offer the
wrapper getWorkDir() method.
Change-Id: Ib698ba4bbc213c48114f342378cecfe377e37bb7
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Merges the current head with one other commit.
In this first iteration the merge command supports
only fast forward and already up-to-date.
Change-Id: I0db480f061e01b343570cf7da02cac13a0cbdf8f
Signed-off-by: Stefan Lay <stefan.lay@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>