Enable DirCacheEntry's copyMetaData to not copy stage info
When there is a conflict sometimes we did not set the stage of
the conflict entries properly for the STAGE_1 entry.
Change-Id: I1c28ff6251fdbc95f7c40fc3e401f1b41157a9f6
Since we replaced GitIndex by DirCache JGit didn't fire
IndexChangedEvents anymore. For EGit this still worked with a high
latency since its RepositoryChangeScanner which is scheduled to
run each 10 seconds fires the event in case the index changes.
This scanner is meant to detect index changes induced by a different
process e.g. by calling "git add" from native git.
When the index is changed from within the same process we should fire
the event synchronously. Compare the index checksum on write to index
checksum when index was read earlier to determine if index really
changed. Use IndexChangedListener interface to keep DirCache decoupled
from Repository.
Change-Id: Id4311f7a7859ffe8738863b3d86c83c8b5f513af
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Eclipse has some problem re-running single JUnit tests if
the tests are in Junit 3 format, but the JUnit 4 launcher
is used. This was quite unnecessary and the move was not
completed. We still have no JUnit4 test.
This completes the extermination of JUnit3. Most of the
work was global searce/replace using regular expression,
followed by numerous invocarions of quick-fix and organize
imports and verification that we had the same number of
tests before and after.
- Annotations were introduced.
- All references to JUnit3 classes removed
- Half-good replacement for getting the test name. This was
needed to make the TestRngs work. The initialization of
TestRngs was also made lazily since we can not longer find
out the test name in runtime in the @Before methods.
- Renamed test classes to end with Test, with the exception
of TestTranslateBundle, which fails from Maven
- Moved JGitTestUtil to the junit support bundle
Change-Id: Iddcd3da6ca927a7be773a9c63ebf8bb2147e2d13
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Fix ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in DirCacheIterator
If the 'TREE' extension contains an invalid subtree that has
been removed, DirCacheIterator still tried to access it due to
an invalid childCnt field within the parent DirCacheTree object.
This is easy for a user to do, they just need to move all files
out of a subdirectory.
For example, the input for the JUnit test case for this bug was
built using the following C Git sequence:
mkdir -p a/b
touch a/b/c q
git add a/b/c q
git write-tree
git mv a/b/c a/a
After the last step, the subdirectory a/b is empty, as its only
file was moved into the parent directory. Because of the earlier
`git write-tree` operation, there is a 'TREE' extension present, but
the a and a/b subdirectories have been marked invalid by the rename.
When JGit tried to iterate over the a tree, it tried to correct
childCnt to be zero as a/b no longer exists, but it failed to
update childCnt.
Change-Id: I7a0f78fc48a36b1a83252d354618f6807fca0426
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
DirCacheIteratorTest: Use newInCore instead of disk
Avoid the dependency on the local filesystem by using only an in-core
DirCache instance. Each test case builds up the index from scratch
anyway through a DirCacheBuilder.
Change-Id: I5decf6bffc3ed35bf1d3e4ad5cc095891c80b772
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Its confusing that a new TreeWalk() needs to have reset() invoked
on it before addTree(). This is a historical accident caused by
how TreeWalk was abused within ObjectWalk.
Drop the initial empty tree from the TreeWalk and thus remove a
number of pointless reset() operations from unit tests and some of
the internal JGit code.
Existing application code which is still calling reset() will simply
be incurring a few unnecessary field assignments, but they should
consider cleaning up their code in the future.
Change-Id: I434e94ffa43491019e7dff52ca420a4d2245f48b
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Extended flags are processed and available via DirCacheEntry's
new isSkipWorkTree() and isIntentToAdd() methods. "resolve-undo"
information is completely ignored since its an optional extension.
Change-Id: Ie6e9c6784c9f265ca3c013c6dc0e6bd29d3b7233
Fix concurrent read / write issue in LockFile on Windows
LockFile.commit fails if another thread concurrently reads
the base file. The problem is fixed by retrying the rename
operation if it fails.
Change-Id: I6bb76ea7f2e6e90e3ddc45f9dd4d69bd1b6fa1eb
Bug: 308506
Signed-off-by: Jens Baumgart <jens.baumgart@sap.com>
Instead of creating the DirCache from a static factory method, use
an instance method on Repository, permitting the implementation to
override the method with a completely different type of DirCache
reading and writing. This would better support a repository in the
cloud strategy, or even just an in-memory unit test environment.
Change-Id: I6399894b12d6480c4b3ac84d10775dfd1b8d13e7
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The repository state tells in which state the repo is and also which actions
are currently allowed. The state MERGING is telling that a commit is not
possible. But this is only true in the case of unmerged paths in the index.
When we are merging but have resolved all conflicts then we are in a special
state: We are still merging (means the next commit should have multiple
parents) but a commit is now allowed.
Since the MERGING state "canCommit()" cannot be enhanced to return true/false
based on the index state (MERGING is an enum value which does not have a
reference to the repository its state it is representing) I had to introduce a new
state MERGING_RESOLVED. This new state will report that a commit is possible.
CAUTION: there might be the chance that users of jgit previously blindly did a
plain commit (with only one parent) when the RepositoryState allowed them to
do so. With this change these users will now be confronted with a RepositoryState
which says a commit is possible but before they can commit they'll have to
check the MERGE_MESSAGE and MERGE_HEAD files and use the info from these
files.
Change-Id: I0a885e2fe8c85049fb23722351ab89cf2c81a431
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
A 0 file mode in a DirCacheEntry is not a valid mode. To C git
such a value indicates the record should not be present. We already
were catching this bad state and exceptioning out when writing tree
objects to disk, but we did not fail when writing the dircache back
to disk. This allowed JGit applications to create a dircache file
which C git would not like to read.
Instead of checking the mode during writes, we now check during
mutation. This allows application bugs to be detected sooner and
closer to the cause site. It also allows us to avoid checking most
of the records which we read in from disk, as we can assume these
are formatted correctly.
Some of our unit tests were not setting the FileMode on their test
entry, so they had to be updated to use REGULAR_FILE.
Change-Id: Ie412053c390b737c0ece57b8e063e4355ee32437
Originally: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/128214/focus=128213
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
CC: Adam W. Hawks <awhawks@writeme.com>
Correctly skip over unrecognized optional dircache extensions
We didn't skip the correct number of bytes when we skipped over an
unrecognized but optional dircache extension. We missed skipping
the 8 byte header that makes up the extension's name and length.
We also didn't include the skipped extension's payload as part of
our index checksum, resuting in a checksum failure when the index
was done reading. So ensure we always scan through a skipped
section and include it in the checksum computation.
Add a test case for a currently unsupported index extension, 'ZZZZ',
to verify we can still read the DirCache object even though we
don't know what 'ZZZZ' is supposed to mean.
Bug: 301287
Change-Id: I4bdde94576fffe826d0782483fd98cab1ea628fa
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Remove RepositoryTestCase from DirCacheCGitCompatabilityTest
This test doesn't actually depend upon the large data set we have
in the RepositoryTestCase, so drop that from the dependency and
use the more simple LocalDiskRepositoryTestCase instead.
Change-Id: I0fd4affe1dd5ec86e8c3253db42df11d3b612e36
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
As discussed on the egit-dev mailing list, we prefer not to have
trailing whitespace in our source code. Correct all currently
offending lines by trimming them.
Change-Id: I002b1d1980071084c0bc53242c8f5900970e6845
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Per CQ 3448 this is the initial contribution of the JGit project
to eclipse.org. It is derived from the historical JGit repository
at commit 3a2dd9921c.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>