mirrors
/
org.aspectj
peilaus alkaen https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj.git
Tarkkaile 1
Äänestä 0
Fork 0
Koodi Ongelmat 0 Julkaisut 139 Wiki Activity
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
8371 Commitit
38 Branchit
Puu: 07405dcd77
Branchit Tagit
${ item.name }
Create branch ${ searchTerm }
from '07405dcd77'
${ noResults }
org.aspectj/docs/adk15ProgGuideDB/joinpointsignatures.xml

joinpointsignatures.xml 19KB
Raaka Normal View Historia

more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
ensure every generated html file has a meaningful name
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
​
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
​
​
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
​
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
ensure every generated html file has a meaningful name
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
​
​
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
Fix for Bug 518698 - typo in AspectJ Notebook: excetution
6 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
​
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
ensure every section has an assigned id so that urls in generated html remain stable across builds.
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
​
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
​
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
​
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
ensure every section has an assigned id so that urls in generated html remain stable across builds.
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
​
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
​
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
ensure every section has an assigned id so that urls in generated html remain stable across builds.
19 vuotta sitten
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
​
​
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
​
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
ensure every generated html file has a meaningful name
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
​
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
​
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
​
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
ensure every generated html file has a meaningful name
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
updates for 1.5.0 M1
19 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
aspectj 5 docs update. Signature matching chapter added. Annotations chapter complete. Varargs, covariance, autoboxing, and enum chapters complete. Pertypewithin proposal written up. Generics, new reflection interfaces, and the "miscellaneous" section still outstanding.
19 vuotta sitten
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
3 vuotta sitten
more updates to 1.5 design
19 vuotta sitten
ensure every section has an assigned id so that urls in generated html remain stable across builds.
19 vuotta sitten
 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353354355356357358359360361362363364365366367368369370371372373374375376377378379380381382383384385386387388389390391392393394395396397398399400401402403404405406407408409410411412413414415416417418419420421422423424425426427428429430431432433434435436437438439440441442443444445446447448449450451452453454455456457458459460461462463464465466467468469470471472473474475476477478479480481482483484485486487488489490491492493494495496497498499500501502503504505506507508509510511512513514515516517518519520521522523524525526527528529530531532533534535536 
  1. <chapter id="jpsigs" xreflabel="Join Point Signatures">

  2. 

  3.   <title>Join Point Signatures</title>

  4. 

  5.     <para>

  6.         Many of the extensions to the AspectJ language to address the new features of

  7.         Java 5 are derived from a simple set of principles for join point

  8.         matching. In this section, we outline these principles as a foundation

  9.         for understanding the matching rules in the presence of annotations,

  10.         generics, covariance, varargs, and autoboxing.

  11.     </para>

  12. 

  13.     <sect1 id="join-point-matching">

  14.         <title>Join Point Matching</title>

  15. 

  16.         <para>AspectJ supports 11 different kinds of join points. These are

  17.         the <literal>method call, method execution, constructor call,

  18.         constructor execution, field get, field set, pre-initialization,

  19.         initialization, static initialization, handler,</literal> and

  20.         <literal>advice execution</literal> join points.</para>

  21. 

  22.         <para>The <emphasis>kinded</emphasis> pointcut designators match

  23.         based on the kind of a join point. These are the <literal>call,

  24.         execution, get, set, preinitialization, initialization,

  25.         staticinitialization, handler,</literal> and <literal>adviceexecution</literal>

  26.         designators.</para>

  27. 

  28.         <para>A kinded pointcut is written using patterns, some of which

  29.         match based on <emphasis>signature</emphasis>, and some of which

  30.         match based on <emphasis>modifiers</emphasis>. For example, in

  31.         the <literal>call</literal> pointcut designator:</para>

  32. 

  33.         <programlisting><![CDATA[

  34. call(ModifierPattern TypePattern TypePattern.IdPattern(TypePatternList) ThrowsPattern)

  35. ]]></programlisting>

  36. 

  37. 		<para>the modifiers matching patterns are <literal>ModifierPattern</literal>

  38. 		and <literal>ThrowsPattern</literal>, and the signature matching patterns

  39. 		are <literal>TypePattern TypePattern.IdPattern(TypePatternList)</literal>.

  40. 		</para>

  41. 

  42. 		<para>

  43. 		A join point has potentially multiple signatures, but only one set of

  44. 		modifiers. <emphasis>A kinded primitive pointcut matches a particular join point

  45. 		if and only if</emphasis>:

  46. 		</para>

  47. 

  48. 		<orderedlist>

  49. 		    <listitem>They are of the same kind</listitem>

  50. 		    <listitem>The signature pattern (exactly) matches at least one

  51. 		    signature of the join point</listitem>

  52. 		    <listitem>The modifiers pattern matches the modifiers of the

  53. 		    subject of the join point</listitem>

  54. 		</orderedlist>

  55. 

  56.         <para>These rules make it very easily to quickly determine whether a

  57.         given pointcut matches a given join point. In the next two sections,

  58.         we describe what the signature(s) of a join point are, and what the

  59.         subjects of join points are.</para>

  60. 

  61.     </sect1>

  62. 

  63.       <sect1 id="join-point-signatures">

  64.         <title>Join Point Signatures</title>

  65. 

  66.         <para>Call, execution, get, and set join points may potentially have multiple

  67.         signatures. All other join points have exactly one signature. The

  68.         following table summarizes the constituent parts of a join point

  69.         signature for the different kinds of join point.</para>

  70. 

  71.         <informaltable>

  72.         <tgroup cols="7">

  73.             <thead>

  74.                 <row>

  75.                     <entry>Join Point Kind</entry>

  76.                     <entry>Return Type</entry>

  77.                     <entry>Declaring Type</entry>

  78.                     <entry>Id</entry>

  79.                     <entry>Parameter Types</entry>

  80.                     <entry>Field Type</entry>

  81.                     <entry>Exception Type</entry>

  82.                 </row>

  83.             </thead>

  84.             <tbody>

  85.                 <row>

  86.                     <entry>Method call</entry>

  87.                     <entry>+</entry>

  88.                     <entry>+</entry>

  89.                     <entry>+</entry>

  90.                     <entry>+</entry>

  91.                     <entry></entry>

  92.                     <entry></entry>

  93.                 </row>

  94.                 <row>

  95.                     <entry>Method execution</entry>

  96.                     <entry>+</entry>

  97.                     <entry>+</entry>

  98.                     <entry>+</entry>

  99.                     <entry>+</entry>

  100.                     <entry></entry>

  101.                     <entry></entry>

  102.                 </row>

  103.                 <row>

  104.                     <entry>Constructor call</entry>

  105.                     <entry></entry>

  106.                     <entry>+</entry>

  107.                     <entry></entry>

  108.                     <entry>+</entry>

  109.                     <entry></entry>

  110.                     <entry></entry>

  111.                 </row>

  112.                 <row>

  113.                     <entry>Constructor execution</entry>

  114.                     <entry></entry>

  115.                     <entry>+</entry>

  116.                     <entry></entry>

  117.                     <entry>+</entry>

  118.                     <entry></entry>

  119.                     <entry></entry>

  120.                 </row>

  121.                 <row>

  122.                     <entry>Field get</entry>

  123.                     <entry></entry>

  124.                     <entry>+</entry>

  125.                     <entry>+</entry>

  126.                     <entry></entry>

  127.                     <entry>+</entry>

  128.                     <entry></entry>

  129.                 </row>

  130.                 <row>

  131.                     <entry>Field set</entry>

  132.                     <entry></entry>

  133.                     <entry>+</entry>

  134.                     <entry>+</entry>

  135.                     <entry></entry>

  136.                     <entry>+</entry>

  137.                     <entry></entry>

  138.                 </row>

  139.                 <row>

  140.                     <entry>Pre-initialization</entry>

  141.                     <entry></entry>

  142.                     <entry>+</entry>

  143.                     <entry></entry>

  144.                     <entry>+</entry>

  145.                     <entry></entry>

  146.                     <entry></entry>

  147.                 </row>

  148.                 <row>

  149.                     <entry>Initialization</entry>

  150.                     <entry></entry>

  151.                     <entry>+</entry>

  152.                     <entry></entry>

  153.                     <entry>+</entry>

  154.                     <entry></entry>

  155.                     <entry></entry>

  156.                 </row>

  157.                 <row>

  158.                     <entry>Static initialization</entry>

  159.                     <entry></entry>

  160.                     <entry>+</entry>

  161.                     <entry></entry>

  162.                     <entry></entry>

  163.                     <entry></entry>

  164.                     <entry></entry>

  165.                 </row>

  166.                 <row>

  167.                     <entry>Handler</entry>

  168.                     <entry></entry>

  169.                     <entry></entry>

  170.                     <entry></entry>

  171.                     <entry></entry>

  172.                     <entry></entry>

  173.                     <entry>+</entry>

  174.                 </row>

  175.                 <row>

  176.                     <entry>Advice execution</entry>

  177.                     <entry></entry>

  178.                     <entry>+</entry>

  179.                     <entry></entry>

  180.                     <entry>+</entry>

  181.                     <entry></entry>

  182.                     <entry></entry>

  183.                 </row>

  184.             </tbody>

  185.         </tgroup>

  186.         </informaltable>

  187. 

  188.         <para>Note that whilst an advice execution join point has a

  189.         signature comprising the declaring type of the advice and the

  190.         advice parameter types, the <literal>adviceexecution</literal>

  191.         pointcut designator does not support matching based on this

  192.         signature.</para>

  193. 

  194.         <para>The signatures for most of the join point kinds should be

  195.         self-explanatory, except for field get and set, and method call and execution

  196.         join points, which can have multiple signatures. Each signature of

  197.         a method call or execution join point has the same id and parameter

  198.         types, but the declaring type and return type (with covariance) may vary.

  199.         Each signature of a field get or set join point has the same id and field

  200.         type, but the declaring type may vary.

  201.         </para>

  202. 

  203.         <para>The following sections examine signatures for these join points

  204.         in more detail.</para>

  205. 

  206.         <sect2 id="method-call-join-point-signatures" xreflabel="method-call-join-point-signatures">

  207.             <title>Method call join point signatures</title>

  208. 

  209.         <para>

  210.           For a call join point where a call is made to a method

  211.           <literal>m(parameter_types)</literal> on a target type <literal>T</literal> (where

  212.           <literal>T</literal> is the static type of the target):

  213.         </para>

  214. 

  215. 		<programlisting><![CDATA[

  216. T t = new T();

  217. t.m("hello");  <= call join point occurs when this line is executed

  218. ]]></programlisting>

  219. 

  220.         <para>

  221.             Then the signature <literal>R(T) T.m(parameter_types)</literal> is a signature

  222.             of the call join point, where <literal>R(T)</literal> is the return

  223.             type of <literal>m</literal> in <literal>T</literal>, and

  224.             <literal>parameter_types</literal> are the parameter types of

  225.             <literal>m</literal>. If <literal>T</literal> itself does not

  226.             declare a definition of <literal>m(parameter_types)</literal>, then

  227.             <literal>R(T)</literal> is the return type in the definition of

  228.             <literal>m</literal> that <literal>T</literal> inherits. Given the

  229.             call above, and the definition of <literal>T.m</literal>:

  230.         </para>

  231. 

  232.         <programlisting><![CDATA[

  233. interface Q {

  234.   R m(String s);

  235. }

  236. 

  237. class P implements Q {

  238.   R m(String s) {...}

  239. }

  240. 

  241. class S extends P {

  242.   R' m(String s) {...}

  243. }

  244. 

  245. class T extends S {}

  246. ]]></programlisting>

  247. 

  248.         <para>Then <literal>R' T.m(String)</literal> is a signature of the

  249.         call join point for <literal>t.m("hello")</literal>.</para>

  250. 

  251.         <para>

  252.             For each ancestor (super-type) <literal>A</literal> of <literal>T</literal>,

  253.             if <literal>m(parameter_types)</literal> is defined for that super-type, then

  254.             <literal>R(A) A.m(parameter_types)</literal> is a signature of the call join

  255.             point, where <literal>R(A)</literal> is the return type of <literal>

  256.             m(parameter_types)</literal> as defined in <literal>A</literal>, or as inherited

  257.             by <literal>A</literal> if <literal>A</literal> itself does not

  258.             provide a definition of <literal>m(parameter_types)</literal>.

  259.         </para>

  260. 

  261.         <para>

  262.             Continuing the example from above,we can deduce that

  263.         </para>

  264. 

  265.         <programlisting><![CDATA[

  266. R' S.m(String)

  267. R  P.m(String)

  268. R  Q.m(String)

  269. ]]></programlisting>

  270. 

  271.         <para>are all additional signatures for the call join point arising

  272.         from the call <literal>t.m("hello")</literal>. Thus this call

  273.         join point has four signatures in total. Every signature has the same

  274.         id and parameter types, and a different declaring type.</para>

  275. 

  276.        </sect2>

  277. 

  278.       <sect2 id="method-execution-join-point-signatures" xreflabel="method-execution-join-point-signatures">

  279.           <title>Method execution join point signatures</title>

  280. 

  281.           <para>Join point signatures for execution join points are defined

  282.           in a similar manner to signatures for call join points. Given the

  283.           hierarchy:

  284.           </para>

  285. 

  286. 

  287.         <programlisting><![CDATA[

  288. interface Q {

  289.   R m(String s);

  290. }

  291. 

  292. class P implements Q {

  293.   R m(String s) {...}

  294. }

  295. 

  296. class S extends P {

  297.   R' m(String s) {...}

  298. }

  299. 

  300. class T extends S { }

  301. 

  302. class U extends T {

  303.   R' m(String s) {...}

  304. }

  305. ]]></programlisting>

  306. 

  307.         <para>Then the execution join point signatures arising as a result

  308.         of the call to <literal>u.m("hello")</literal> are: </para>

  309. 

  310.         <programlisting><![CDATA[

  311. R' U.m(String)

  312. R' S.m(String)

  313. R  P.m(String)

  314. R  Q.m(String)

  315. ]]></programlisting>

  316. 

  317.         <para>Each signature has the same id and parameter types, and a

  318.         different declaring type. There is one signature for each type

  319.         that provides its own declaration of the method. Hence in this

  320.         example there is no signature <literal>R' T.m(String)</literal>

  321.         as <literal>T</literal> does not provide its own declaration of

  322.         the method.</para>

  323. 

  324.       </sect2>

  325. 

  326.        <sect2 id="field-get-and-set-join-point-signatures" xreflabel="field-get-and-set-join-point-signatures">

  327.             <title>Field get and set join point signatures</title>

  328. 

  329.         <para>

  330.             For a field get join point where an access is made to a field

  331.             <literal>f</literal> of type <literal>F</literal>

  332.             on a object with declared type <literal>T</literal>, then

  333.             <literal>F T.f</literal> is a signature of the get join point.

  334.         </para>

  335. 

  336.         <para>

  337.             If <literal>T</literal> does not directly declare a member

  338.             <literal>f</literal>, then for each super type <literal>S</literal>

  339.             of <literal>T</literal>, up to and including the most specific

  340.             super type of <literal>T</literal> that does declare the member

  341.             <literal>f</literal>, <literal>F S.f</literal> is a signature

  342.             of the join point. For example, given the hierarchy:

  343.         </para>

  344. 

  345.         <programlisting><![CDATA[

  346. class P  {

  347.   F f;

  348. }

  349. 

  350. class S extends P {

  351.   F f;

  352. }

  353. 

  354. class T extends S { }

  355. ]]></programlisting>

  356. 

  357. 		<para>

  358. 		    Then the join point signatures for a field get join point of

  359. 		    the field <literal>f</literal> on an object with declared type

  360. 		    <literal>T</literal> are:

  361. 		</para>

  362. 

  363.         <programlisting><![CDATA[

  364. F S.f

  365. F T.f

  366. ]]></programlisting>

  367. 

  368.         <para>The signatures for a field set join point are derived in an

  369.             identical manner.</para>

  370. 

  371.        </sect2>

  372. 

  373.       </sect1>

  374. 

  375.       <sect1 id="join-point-modifiers">

  376.           <title>Join Point Modifiers</title>

  377. 

  378.           <para>Every join point has a single set of modifiers - these include

  379.           the standard Java modifiers such as <literal>public, private,

  380.           static, abstract</literal> etc., any annotations, and the throws

  381.           clauses of methods and constructors. These modifiers are the

  382.           modifiers of the <emphasis>subject</emphasis> of the join point.</para>

  383. 

  384.           <para>

  385.           The following table defines the join point subject for each kind

  386.           of join point.

  387.           </para>

  388. 

  389.              <informaltable>

  390.            <tgroup cols="2">

  391.                <thead>

  392.                    <row>

  393.                        <entry>Join Point Kind</entry>

  394.                        <entry>Subject</entry>

  395.                    </row>

  396.                </thead>

  397.                <tbody>

  398.                    <row>

  399.                        <entry>Method call</entry>

  400.                        <entry>The method picked out by Java as

  401.                        the static target of the method call.</entry>

  402.                    </row>

  403.                    <row>

  404.                        <entry>Method execution</entry>

  405.                        <entry>The method that is executing.</entry>

  406.                    </row>

  407.                    <row>

  408.                        <entry>Constructor call</entry>

  409.                        <entry>The constructor being called.</entry>

  410.                    </row>

  411.                    <row>

  412.                        <entry>Constructor execution</entry>

  413.                        <entry>The constructor executing.</entry>

  414.                    </row>

  415.                    <row>

  416.                        <entry>Field get</entry>

  417.                        <entry>The field being accessed.</entry>

  418.                    </row>

  419.                    <row>

  420.                        <entry>Field set</entry>

  421.                        <entry>The field being set.</entry>

  422.                    </row>

  423.                    <row>

  424.                        <entry>Pre-initialization</entry>

  425.                        <entry>The first constructor executing in

  426.                        this constructor chain.</entry>

  427.                    </row>

  428.                    <row>

  429.                        <entry>Initialization</entry>

  430.                        <entry>The first constructor executing in

  431.                        this constructor chain.</entry>

  432.                    </row>

  433.                    <row>

  434.                        <entry>Static initialization</entry>

  435.                        <entry>The type being initialized.</entry>

  436.                    </row>

  437.                    <row>

  438.                        <entry>Handler</entry>

  439.                        <entry>The declared type of the

  440.                        exception being handled.</entry>

  441.                    </row>

  442.                    <row>

  443.                        <entry>Advice execution</entry>

  444.                        <entry>The advice being executed.</entry>

  445.                    </row>

  446.                </tbody>

  447.            </tgroup>

  448.           </informaltable>

  449. 

  450.              <para>For example, given the following types</para>

  451. 

  452.         <programlisting><![CDATA[

  453. public class X {

  454.   @Foo

  455.   protected void doIt() {...}

  456. }

  457. 

  458. public class Y extends X {

  459.   public void doIt() {...}

  460. }

  461. ]]></programlisting>

  462. 

  463.          <para>Then the modifiers for a call to <literal>(Y y) y.doIt()</literal>

  464.          are simply <literal>{public}</literal>. The modifiers for a call to

  465.          <literal>(X x) x.doIt()</literal> are <literal>{@Foo,protected}</literal>.

  466.          </para>

  467. 

  468.       </sect1>

  469. 

  470.       <sect1 id="join-point-matching-summary">

  471.           <title>Summary of Join Point Matching</title>

  472. 

  473. 		<para>

  474. 		A join point has potentially multiple signatures, but only one set of

  475. 		modifiers. <emphasis>A kinded primitive pointcut matches a particular join point

  476. 		if and only if</emphasis>:

  477. 		</para>

  478. 

  479. 		<orderedlist>

  480. 		    <listitem>They are of the same kind</listitem>

  481. 		    <listitem>The signature pattern (exactly) matches at least one

  482. 		    signature of the join point</listitem>

  483. 		    <listitem>The modifiers pattern matches the modifiers of the

  484. 		    subject of the join point</listitem>

  485. 		</orderedlist>

  486. 

  487.         <para>Given the hierarchy</para>

  488. 

  489.         <programlisting><![CDATA[

  490. interface Q {

  491.   R m(String s);

  492. }

  493. 

  494. class P implements Q {

  495.   @Foo

  496.   public R m(String s) {...}

  497. }

  498. 

  499. class S extends P {

  500.   @Bar

  501.   public R' m(String s) {...}

  502. }

  503. 

  504. class T extends S {}

  505. ]]></programlisting>

  506. 

  507.         <para>and the program fragment:</para>

  508. 

  509.         <programlisting><![CDATA[

  510. P p = new P();

  511. S s = new S();

  512. T t = new T();

  513. ...

  514. p.m("hello");

  515. s.m("hello");

  516. t.m("hello");

  517. ]]></programlisting>

  518. 

  519.         <para>

  520.         The the pointcut <literal>call(@Foo R P.m(String))</literal> matches the

  521.         call <literal>p.m("hello")</literal> since both the signature and the

  522.         modifiers match. It does not match the call <literal>s.m("hello")</literal>

  523.         because even though the signature pattern matches one of the signatures

  524.         of the join point, the modifiers pattern does not match the modifiers of

  525.         the method m in S which is the static target of the call.

  526.         </para>

  527. 

  528.         <para>The pointcut <literal>call(R' m(String))</literal> matches the

  529.         calls <literal>t.m("hello")</literal> and <literal>s.m("hello")</literal>.

  530.         It does not match the call <literal>p.m("hello")</literal> since the

  531.         signature pattern does not match any signature for the call join point

  532.         of m in P.</para>

  533.       </sect1>

  534. 

  535. </chapter>

  536.