Add test infrastructure for Java 21 (WIP)

The tests and their XML definitions are still copy & paste and need to
be cleaned up. Separate Java 21 feature tests do not exist yet.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

bcel-builder/src/main/java/org/aspectj/apache/bcel/Constants.java

@@ -104,8 +104,10 @@ public interface Constants {
 	short MINOR_19 = 0;
 	short MAJOR_20 = 64;
 	short MINOR_20 = 0;
-//	short MAJOR_21 = 65;
-//	short MINOR_21 = 0;
+	short MAJOR_21 = 65;
+	short MINOR_21 = 0;
+//	short MAJOR_22 = 66;
+//	short MINOR_22 = 0;
 
 	int PREVIEW_MINOR_VERSION = 65535;
 

taskdefs/src/main/java/org/aspectj/tools/ant/taskdefs/AjcTask.java

@@ -252,15 +252,15 @@ public class AjcTask extends MatchingTask {
 
 	static final String[] TARGET_INPUTS = new String[] {
 		"1.1", "1.2", "1.3", "1.4", "1.5", "1.6", "1.7", "1.8", "1.9", "9",
-		"10", "11", "12", "13", "14", "15", "16", "17", "18", "19", "20"
+		"10", "11", "12", "13", "14", "15", "16", "17", "18", "19", "20", "21"
 	};
 	static final String[] SOURCE_INPUTS = new String[] {
 		"1.3", "1.4", "1.5", "1.6", "1.7", "1.8", "1.9", "9",
-		"10", "11", "12", "13", "14", "15", "16", "17", "18", "19", "20"
+		"10", "11", "12", "13", "14", "15", "16", "17", "18", "19", "20", "21"
 	};
 	static final String[] COMPLIANCE_INPUTS = new String[] {
 		"-1.3", "-1.4", "-1.5", "-1.6", "-1.7", "-1.8", "-1.9", "-9",
-		"-10", "-11", "-12", "-13", "-14", "-15", "-16", "-17", "-18", "-19", "-20"
+		"-10", "-11", "-12", "-13", "-14", "-15", "-16", "-17", "-18", "-19", "-20", "-21"
 	};
 
 	private static final ICommandEditor COMMAND_EDITOR;

testing/src/test/java/org/aspectj/testing/XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava20Only.java

@@ -20,14 +20,13 @@ public abstract class XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava20Only extends XMLBasedAjcTestCa
 	@Override
 	public void setUp() throws Exception {
 		// Activate this block after upgrading to JDT Core Java 21
-		/*
 		throw new IllegalStateException(
 			"These tests need a Java 20 level AspectJ compiler " +
 				"(e.g. because they use version-specific preview features). " +
 				"This compiler does not support preview features of a previous version anymore."
 		);
-		*/
 		// Activate this block before upgrading to JDT Core Java 21
+		/*
 		if (!LangUtil.is20VMOrGreater() || LangUtil.is21VMOrGreater()) {
 			throw new IllegalStateException(
 				"These tests should be run on Java 20 only " +
@@ -35,6 +34,7 @@ public abstract class XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava20Only extends XMLBasedAjcTestCa
 			);
 		}
 		super.setUp();
+		*/
 	}
 
 }

testing/src/test/java/org/aspectj/testing/XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava21Only.java

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+/* *******************************************************************
+ * Copyright (c) 2023 Contributors
+ * All rights reserved.
+ * This program and the accompanying materials are made available
+ * under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v 2.0
+ * which accompanies this distribution and is available at
+ * https://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/epl-2.0/EPL-2.0.txt
+ * ******************************************************************/
+package org.aspectj.testing;
+
+import org.aspectj.util.LangUtil;
+
+/**
+ * Makes sure tests are running on the right level of JDK.
+ *
+ * @author Alexander Kriegisch
+ */
+public abstract class XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava21Only extends XMLBasedAjcTestCase {
+
+	@Override
+	public void setUp() throws Exception {
+		// Activate this block after upgrading to JDT Core Java 22
+		/*
+		throw new IllegalStateException(
+			"These tests need a Java 21 level AspectJ compiler " +
+				"(e.g. because they use version-specific preview features). " +
+				"This compiler does not support preview features of a previous version anymore."
+		);
+		*/
+		// Activate this block before upgrading to JDT Core Java 22
+		if (!LangUtil.is21VMOrGreater() || LangUtil.is22VMOrGreater()) {
+			throw new IllegalStateException(
+				"These tests should be run on Java 21 only " +
+				"(e.g. because they use version-specific preview features)"
+			);
+		}
+		super.setUp();
+	}
+
+}

testing/src/test/java/org/aspectj/testing/XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava21OrLater.java

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+/* *******************************************************************
+ * Copyright (c) 2023 Contributors
+ * All rights reserved.
+ * This program and the accompanying materials are made available
+ * under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v 2.0
+ * which accompanies this distribution and is available at
+ * https://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/epl-2.0/EPL-2.0.txt
+ * ******************************************************************/
+package org.aspectj.testing;
+
+import org.aspectj.util.LangUtil;
+
+/**
+ * Makes sure tests are running on the right level of JDK.
+ *
+ * @author Alexander Kriegisch
+ */
+public abstract class XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava21OrLater extends XMLBasedAjcTestCase {
+
+	@Override
+	public void setUp() throws Exception {
+		if (!LangUtil.is21VMOrGreater())
+			throw new IllegalStateException("These tests should be run on Java 21 or later");
+		super.setUp();
+	}
+
+}

tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/AllTestsAspectJ1920.java

@@ -24,10 +24,11 @@ public class AllTestsAspectJ1920 {
 			suite.addTest(Ajc1920TestsJava.suite());
 		}
 		// Do not run tests using a previous compiler's preview features anymore. They would all fail.
-		// TODO: Comment out the following block when upgrading JDT Core to Java 20
+		/*
 		if (LangUtil.is20VMOrGreater() && !LangUtil.is21VMOrGreater()) {
 			suite.addTest(Java20PreviewFeaturesTests.suite());
 		}
+		*/
 		return suite;
 	}
 }

tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/Java20PreviewFeaturesTests.java

@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ public class Java20PreviewFeaturesTests extends XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava20Only
   }
 
   public void testRecordPatternsPreview1Error() {
-    // https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core/issues/450 (fixed for preview 2 in Eclipse 2033-03, 4.27)
+    // https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core/issues/450 (fixed for preview 2 in Eclipse 2023-03, 4.27)
     runTest("record patterns error");
     checkVersion("RecordPatternsPreview1Error", Constants.MAJOR_20, Constants.PREVIEW_MINOR_VERSION);
     checkVersion("Box", Constants.MAJOR_20, Constants.PREVIEW_MINOR_VERSION);

tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1921/Ajc1921TestsJava.java

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+/*******************************************************************************
+ * Copyright (c) 2022 Contributors
+ * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
+ * are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v 2.0
+ * which accompanies this distribution, and is available at
+ * https://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/epl-2.0/EPL-2.0.txt
+ *******************************************************************************/
+package org.aspectj.systemtest.ajc1921;
+
+import junit.framework.Test;
+import org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase;
+import org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava21OrLater;
+
+/**
+ * @author Alexander Kriegisch
+ */
+public class Ajc1921TestsJava extends XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava21OrLater {
+
+  public void testDummyJava21() {
+    //runTest("dummy Java 21");
+  }
+
+  public static Test suite() {
+    return XMLBasedAjcTestCase.loadSuite(Ajc1921TestsJava.class);
+  }
+
+  @Override
+  protected java.net.URL getSpecFile() {
+    return getClassResource("ajc1921.xml");
+  }
+
+}

tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1921/AllTestsAspectJ1921.java

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+/*******************************************************************************
+ * Copyright (c) 2022 Contributors
+ * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
+ * are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v 2.0
+ * which accompanies this distribution, and is available at
+ * https://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/epl-2.0/EPL-2.0.txt
+ *******************************************************************************/
+package org.aspectj.systemtest.ajc1921;
+
+import junit.framework.Test;
+import junit.framework.TestSuite;
+import org.aspectj.util.LangUtil;
+
+/**
+ * @author Alexander Kriegisch
+ */
+public class AllTestsAspectJ1921 {
+
+	public static Test suite() {
+		TestSuite suite = new TestSuite("AspectJ 1.9.21 tests");
+		suite.addTest(Bugs1921Tests.suite());
+		if (LangUtil.is21VMOrGreater()) {
+			suite.addTest(SanityTestsJava21.suite());
+			suite.addTest(Ajc1921TestsJava.suite());
+		}
+		// Do not run tests using a previous compiler's preview features anymore. They would all fail.
+		// TODO: Comment out the following block when upgrading JDT Core to Java 22
+		if (LangUtil.is21VMOrGreater() && !LangUtil.is22VMOrGreater()) {
+			suite.addTest(Java21PreviewFeaturesTests.suite());
+		}
+		return suite;
+	}
+}

tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1921/Bugs1921Tests.java

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+/*******************************************************************************
+ * Copyright (c) 2023 Contributors
+ * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
+ * are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v 2.0
+ * which accompanies this distribution, and is available at
+ * https://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/epl-2.0/EPL-2.0.txt
+ *******************************************************************************/
+package org.aspectj.systemtest.ajc1921;
+
+import junit.framework.Test;
+import org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase;
+
+/**
+ * @author Alexander Kriegisch
+ */
+public class Bugs1921Tests extends XMLBasedAjcTestCase {
+
+  public void testSwitchWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE() {
+    runTest("switch with Integer.MAX_VALUE case");
+  }
+
+  public void testParenthesisedExpressionWithAjKeyword() {
+    runTest("parenthesised expression with AspectJ keyword");
+  }
+
+  public void testInterfaceInnerAspectImplicitlyStatic() {
+    runTest("inner aspect of interface is implicitly static");
+  }
+
+  public void testExactArrayTypeMatchCompiledTogether() {
+    runTest("exact array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class");
+  }
+
+  public void testExactArrayTypeMatchCompiledSeparately() {
+    runTest("exact array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class");
+  }
+
+  public void testFuzzyArrayTypeMatchCompiledTogether() {
+    runTest("fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class");
+  }
+
+  public void testFuzzyArrayTypeMatchCompiledSeparately() {
+    runTest("fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class");
+  }
+
+  public void test_GitHub_214() {
+    runTest("ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException with Xlint unorderedAdviceAtShadow=warning");
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Add correct annotations to multiple ITD methods with the same name and same number of arguments, i.e. copy the
+   * annotations correctly from the aspect into the target class instead of falsely always copying the annotations (if
+   * any) from the first ITD method found.
+   * <p>
+   * See <a href="https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/246">GitHub issue 246</a>.
+   */
+  public void test_GitHub_246() {
+    runTest("add correct annotations to multiple ITD methods with the same name and same number of arguments");
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Make sure to create one {@code ajc$inlineAccessMethod} for identically named (overloaded) private aspect methods.
+   * <p>
+   * See <a href="https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/250">GitHub issue 250</a>.
+   */
+  public void test_GitHub_250() {
+    runTest("correctly handle overloaded private methods in aspects");
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * If one generic method overrides another one with a narrower return type, avoid matching bridge methods.
+   * <p>
+   * See <a href="https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/27761">Spring GitHub issue 27761</a>.
+   * <p>
+   * This test uses an ASM-modified class file reproducing the problem seen in Spring in plain AspectJ. Before the
+   * bugfix, it fails with <b>"advice defined in RepositoryAspect has not been applied [Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch]".</b>
+   */
+  public void test_Spring_GitHub_27761() {
+    runTest("do not match bridge methods");
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * In 1.9.20, a regression bug occurred, matching negated types like '!void' and '!String' incorrectly.
+   * <p>
+   * See <a href="https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/257">GitHub issue 257</a>.
+   */
+  public void test_GitHub_257() {
+    runTest("handle negated type patterns correctly");
+  }
+
+  public static Test suite() {
+    return XMLBasedAjcTestCase.loadSuite(Bugs1921Tests.class);
+  }
+
+  @Override
+  protected java.net.URL getSpecFile() {
+    return getClassResource("ajc1921.xml");
+  }
+
+}

tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1921/Java21PreviewFeaturesTests.java

@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+/*******************************************************************************
+ * Copyright (c) 2023 Contributors
+ * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
+ * are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v 2.0
+ * which accompanies this distribution, and is available at
+ * https://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/epl-2.0/EPL-2.0.txt
+ *******************************************************************************/
+package org.aspectj.systemtest.ajc1921;
+
+import junit.framework.Test;
+import org.aspectj.apache.bcel.Constants;
+import org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase;
+import org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava21Only;
+
+/**
+ * @author Alexander Kriegisch
+ */
+public class Java21PreviewFeaturesTests extends XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava21Only {
+
+  public void testSwitchPatternMatchingPreview4Java() {
+    runTest("switch pattern matching preview 4 java");
+    checkVersion("SwitchPatternPreview4OK", Constants.MAJOR_21, Constants.PREVIEW_MINOR_VERSION);
+  }
+
+  public void testSwitchPatternMatchingPreview4Error() {
+    runTest("switch pattern matching preview 4 error");
+  }
+
+  public void testSwitchPatternMatchingPreview3Aspect() {
+    runTest("switch pattern matching preview 3 aspect");
+    checkVersion("SwitchPatternPreview3Aspect", Constants.MAJOR_21, Constants.PREVIEW_MINOR_VERSION);
+    checkVersion("Application", Constants.MAJOR_21, Constants.PREVIEW_MINOR_VERSION);
+    checkVersion("Shape", Constants.MAJOR_21, Constants.PREVIEW_MINOR_VERSION);
+    checkVersion("S", Constants.MAJOR_21, Constants.PREVIEW_MINOR_VERSION);
+  }
+
+  public void testSwitchPatternMatchingCaseLabelDominatedByPrecedingError() {
+    runTest("switch pattern matching error");
+  }
+
+  public void testSwitchPatternMatchingPreview3Error1() {
+    runTest("switch pattern matching preview 3 error 1");
+  }
+
+  public void testSwitchPatternMatchingPreview3Error2() {
+    runTest("switch pattern matching preview 3 error 2");
+  }
+
+  public void testRecordPatternsPreview1OK() {
+    // https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core/issues/450
+    runTest("record patterns");
+  }
+
+  public void testRecordPatternsPreview1Error() {
+    // https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core/issues/450 (fixed for preview 2 in Eclipse 2023-03, 4.27)
+    runTest("record patterns error");
+    checkVersion("RecordPatternsPreview1Error", Constants.MAJOR_21, Constants.PREVIEW_MINOR_VERSION);
+    checkVersion("Box", Constants.MAJOR_21, Constants.PREVIEW_MINOR_VERSION);
+  }
+
+  public void testRecordPatternsPreview1ExhaustivenessOK1() {
+    // Falsely throws 'An enhanced switch statement should be exhaustive; a default label expected' twice,
+    // see https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core/issues/455
+    // TODO: Remove redundant default clauses when fixed upstream
+    System.out.println("TODO: fully activate when https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core/issues/455 has been fixed");
+    runTest("record patterns exhaustiveness 1");
+  }
+
+  public void testRecordPatternsPreview1Aspect() {
+    runTest("record patterns aspect");
+  }
+
+  public void testRecordPatternsPreview1ExhaustivenessAspect() {
+    // Falsely throws 'An enhanced switch statement should be exhaustive; a default label expected' twice,
+    // see https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core/issues/455
+    // TODO: Remove redundant default clauses when fixed upstream
+    System.out.println("TODO: fully activate when https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core/issues/455 has been fixed");
+    runTest("record patterns exhaustiveness aspect");
+  }
+
+  public void testRecordPatternsPreview1ExhaustivenessError() {
+    // See https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core/issues/455
+    runTest("record patterns exhaustiveness error");
+  }
+
+  public void testRecordPatternsPreview1ExhaustivenessOK2() {
+    // Falsely throws 'An enhanced switch statement should be exhaustive; a default label expected',
+    // see https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core/issues/398
+    // TODO: activate when fixed
+    System.out.println("TODO: activate when https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core/issues/398 has been fixed");
+    //runTest("record patterns exhaustiveness 2");
+  }
+
+  public static Test suite() {
+    return XMLBasedAjcTestCase.loadSuite(Java21PreviewFeaturesTests.class);
+  }
+
+  @Override
+  protected java.net.URL getSpecFile() {
+    return getClassResource("ajc1921.xml");
+  }
+
+}

tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1921/SanityTestsJava21.java

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+/*******************************************************************************
+ * Copyright (c) 2023 Contributors
+ * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
+ * are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v 2.0
+ * which accompanies this distribution, and is available at
+ * https://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/epl-2.0/EPL-2.0.txt
+ *******************************************************************************/
+package org.aspectj.systemtest.ajc1921;
+
+import junit.framework.Test;
+import org.aspectj.apache.bcel.Constants;
+import org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase;
+import org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava21OrLater;
+
+/*
+ * Some very trivial tests that help verify things are OK.
+ * These are a copy of the earlier Sanity Tests created for 1.6 but these supply the -21 option
+ * to check code generation and modification with that version specified.
+ *
+ * @author Alexander Kriegisch
+ */
+public class SanityTestsJava21 extends XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava21OrLater {
+
+	public static final int bytecode_version_for_JDK_level = Constants.MAJOR_21;
+
+	// Incredibly trivial test programs that check the compiler works at all (these are easy-ish to debug)
+	public void testSimpleJava_A() {
+		runTest("simple - a");
+	}
+
+	public void testSimpleJava_B() {
+		runTest("simple - b");
+	}
+
+	public void testSimpleCode_C() {
+		runTest("simple - c");
+	}
+
+	public void testSimpleCode_D() {
+		runTest("simple - d");
+	}
+
+	public void testSimpleCode_E() {
+		runTest("simple - e");
+	}
+
+	public void testSimpleCode_F() {
+		runTest("simple - f");
+	}
+
+	public void testSimpleCode_G() {
+		runTest("simple - g");
+	}
+
+	public void testSimpleCode_H() {
+		runTest("simple - h", true);
+	}
+
+	public void testSimpleCode_I() {
+		runTest("simple - i");
+	}
+
+	public void testVersionCorrect1() {
+		runTest("simple - j");
+		checkVersion("A", bytecode_version_for_JDK_level, 0);
+	}
+
+	public void testVersionCorrect2() {
+		runTest("simple - k");
+		checkVersion("A", bytecode_version_for_JDK_level, 0);
+	}
+
+	public void testVersionCorrect4() {
+		runTest("simple - m");
+		// Must be 49.0 when -1.5 is specified
+		checkVersion("A", Constants.MAJOR_1_5, 0);
+	}
+
+	public static Test suite() {
+		return XMLBasedAjcTestCase.loadSuite(SanityTestsJava21.class);
+	}
+
+	@Override
+	protected java.net.URL getSpecFile() {
+		return getClassResource("sanity-tests-21.xml");
+	}
+
+}

tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/ajc1920.xml

@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
 	<!-- Java ?? final, Java 19, 20 preview -->
 	<ajc-test dir="features1919/java19" vm="20" title="record patterns error">
 		<compile files="RecordPatternsPreview1Error.java" options="--enable-preview -20">
-			<!-- https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core/issues/450 (fixed for preview 2 in Eclipse 2033-03, 4.27) -->
+			<!-- https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core/issues/450 (fixed for preview 2 in Eclipse 2023-03, 4.27) -->
 			<!--
 			<message kind="error" file="RecordPatternsPreview1Error.java" text="Raw types are not allowed in record patterns"/>
 			<message kind="error" file="RecordPatternsPreview1Error.java" text="Raw types are not allowed in record patterns"/>

tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1921/ajc1921.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,478 @@
+<!DOCTYPE suite SYSTEM "../tests/ajcTestSuite.dtd"[]>
+
+<!--
+  Java 20: no new final language features, only preview/incubator ones:
+    - "JEP 432:	Record Patterns (Second Preview)" (###)
+    - "JEP 433:	Pattern Matching for switch (Fourth Preview)" (###)
+    - "JEP 429:	Scoped Values (Incubator)" (API only)
+    - "JEP 436:	Virtual Threads (Second Preview)" (API only)
+    - "JEP 437:	Structured Concurrency (Second Incubator)" (API only)
+-->
+<suite>
+
+	<!-- Java ?? final, Java 17, 18, 19, 20 preview -->
+	<ajc-test dir="features1920/java20" vm="21" title="switch pattern matching preview 4 java">
+		<compile files="SwitchPatternPreview4OK.java" options="--enable-preview -21" />
+		<run class="SwitchPatternPreview4OK" vmargs="--enable-preview">
+			<message></message>
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="null" />
+				<line text="int 123" />
+				<line text="long 999" />
+				<line text="double 12.340000" />
+				<line text="String foo" />
+				<line text="[123, foo, 999, 12.34]" />
+				<line text="Non-circle" />
+				<line text="Small circle" />
+				<line text="Large circle" />
+				<line text="Sealed sub-class A" />
+				<line text="Sealed sub-class B" />
+				<line text="Sealed sub-record C" />
+				<line text="absolute value 1: -1" />
+				<line text="other integer: 0" />
+				<line text="positive integer: 42" />
+				<line text="other integer: -99" />
+				<line text="positive integer: 123" />
+				<line text="value unavailable: null" />
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!-- Java ?? final, Java 17, 18, 19, 20 preview -->
+	<ajc-test dir="features1920/java20" vm="21" title="switch pattern matching preview 4 error">
+		<compile files="SwitchPatternPreview4Error.java" options="--enable-preview -21">
+			<!-- TODO: Add correct compiler error message, as soon as JDT Core supports it -->
+			<message kind="error" file="SwitchPatternPreview4Error.java" text="This case label is dominated by one of the preceding case labels"/>
+		</compile>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!-- Java ?? final, Java 17, 18, 19, 20 preview -->
+	<ajc-test dir="features1919/java19" vm="21" title="switch pattern matching preview 3 aspect">
+		<compile files="SwitchPatternPreview3Aspect.aj" options="--enable-preview -21" />
+		<run class="Application" vmargs="--enable-preview">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="null" />
+				<line text="int 123" />
+				<line text="long 999" />
+				<line text="double 12.340000" />
+				<line text="String foo" />
+				<line text="[123, foo, 999, 12.34]" />
+				<line text="Non-circle" />
+				<line text="Small circle" />
+				<line text="Large circle" />
+				<line text="Sealed sub-class A" />
+				<line text="Sealed sub-class B" />
+				<line text="Sealed sub-record C" />
+				<line text="absolute value 1: -1" />
+				<line text="other integer: 0" />
+				<line text="positive integer: 42" />
+				<line text="other integer: -99" />
+				<line text="positive integer: 123" />
+				<line text="value unavailable: null" />
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!-- Java ?? final, Java 17, 18, 19, 20 preview -->
+	<ajc-test dir="features198/java17" vm="21" title="switch pattern matching error">
+		<compile files="SwitchPatternError.java" options="--enable-preview -21">
+			<!-- TODO: Add correct compiler error message, as soon as JDT Core supports it -->
+			<message kind="error" file="SwitchPatternError.java" text="This case label is dominated by one of the preceding case labels"/>
+		</compile>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!-- Java ?? final, Java 17, 18, 19, 20 preview -->
+	<ajc-test dir="features1919/java19" vm="21" title="switch pattern matching preview 3 error 1">
+		<compile files="SwitchPatternPreview3Error1.java" options="--enable-preview -21">
+			<!-- TODO: Add correct compiler error message, as soon as JDT Core supports it -->
+			<message kind="error" file="SwitchPatternPreview3Error1.java" text="This case label is dominated by one of the preceding case labels"/>
+		</compile>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!-- Java ?? final, Java 17, 18, 19, 20 preview -->
+	<ajc-test dir="features1919/java19" vm="21" title="switch pattern matching preview 3 error 2">
+		<compile files="SwitchPatternPreview3Error2.java" options="--enable-preview -21">
+			<!-- TODO: Add correct compiler error message, as soon as JDT Core supports it -->
+			<message kind="error" file="SwitchPatternPreview3Error2.java" text="This case label is dominated by one of the preceding case labels"/>
+		</compile>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!-- Java ?? final, Java 19, 20 preview -->
+	<ajc-test dir="features1919/java19" vm="21" title="record patterns">
+		<compile files="RecordPatternsPreview1OK.java" options="--enable-preview -21"/>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!-- Java ?? final, Java 19, 20 preview -->
+	<ajc-test dir="features1919/java19" vm="21" title="record patterns error">
+		<compile files="RecordPatternsPreview1Error.java" options="--enable-preview -21">
+			<!-- https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core/issues/450 (fixed for preview 2 in Eclipse 2023-03, 4.27) -->
+			<!--
+			<message kind="error" file="RecordPatternsPreview1Error.java" text="Raw types are not allowed in record patterns"/>
+			<message kind="error" file="RecordPatternsPreview1Error.java" text="Raw types are not allowed in record patterns"/>
+			-->
+		</compile>
+		<run class="RecordPatternsPreview1Error" vmargs="--enable-preview">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="I'm a box"/>
+				<line text="I'm a box"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!-- Java ?? final, Java 19, 20 preview -->
+	<ajc-test dir="features1919/java19" vm="21" title="record patterns exhaustiveness 1">
+		<compile files="RecordPatternsPreview1ExhaustivenessOK1.java" options="--enable-preview -21"/>
+		<run class="RecordPatternsPreview1ExhaustivenessOK1" vmargs="--enable-preview">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="y"/>
+				<line text="a"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!-- Java ?? final, Java 19, 20 preview -->
+	<ajc-test dir="features1919/java19" vm="21" title="record patterns exhaustiveness aspect">
+		<compile files="RecordPatternsPreview1ExhaustivenessAspect.aj" options="--enable-preview -21"/>
+		<!-- TODO: Remove redundant default clauses when https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core/issues/455 has been fixed -->
+		<run class="RecordPatternsPreview1ExhaustivenessAspect" vmargs="--enable-preview">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="y"/>
+				<line text="a"/>
+				<line text="Pair[x=C@000, y=D@000]"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!-- Java ?? final, Java 19, 20 preview -->
+	<ajc-test dir="features1919/java19" vm="21" title="record patterns aspect">
+		<compile files="RecordPatternsPreview1Aspect.aj" options="--enable-preview -21"/>
+		<run class="RecordPatternsPreview1Aspect" vmargs="--enable-preview">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="9"/>
+				<line text="14"/>
+				<line text="Doing something with Point[x=2, y=7]"/>
+				<line text="Upper-left color: RED"/>
+				<line text="Upper-left color: RED"/>
+				<line text="Upper-left x coordinate: 1"/>
+				<line text="Doing something with Rectangle[upperLeft=ColoredPoint[p=Point[x=1, y=6], c=RED], lowerRight=ColoredPoint[p=Point[x=4, y=6], c=BLUE]]"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!-- Java ?? final, Java 19, 20 preview -->
+	<ajc-test dir="features1919/java19" vm="21" title="record patterns exhaustiveness error">
+		<compile files="RecordPatternsPreview1ExhaustivenessError.java" options="--enable-preview -21">
+			<message kind="error" file="RecordPatternsPreview1ExhaustivenessError.java" text="An enhanced switch statement should be exhaustive; a default label expected"/>
+		</compile>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!-- Java ?? final, Java 19, 20 preview -->
+	<ajc-test dir="features1919/java19" vm="21" title="record patterns exhaustiveness 2">
+		<compile files="RecordPatternsPreview1ExhaustivenessOK2.java" options="--enable-preview -21"/>
+		<run class="RecordPatternsPreview1ExhaustivenessOK2" vmargs="--enable-preview">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="Bob 12"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!-- RuntimeException in BcelWeaver, see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/190 -->
+	<ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_190" vm="1.5" title="switch with Integer.MAX_VALUE case">
+		<compile files="SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
+			<message kind="weave" text="Join point 'method-execution(java.lang.String SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.switchTest(int))'"/>
+		 </compile>
+		<run class="SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="execution(String SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.switchTest(int))"/>
+				<line text="CASE_1"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!--
+		'Syntax error, insert "Expression" to complete Expression' when compiling parenthesised expressions
+		containing AspectJ keywords, e.g. '(before)', see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/20
+	-->
+	<ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_20" vm="1.5" title="parenthesised expression with AspectJ keyword">
+		<compile files="ParenthesisedAJKeywords.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo"/>
+		<run class="ParenthesisedAJKeywords">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="before"/>
+				<line text="after"/>
+				<line text="around"/>
+				<line text="aspect"/>
+				<line text="pointcut"/>
+				<line text="declare"/>
+				<line text="privileged"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!--
+		'inner aspects must be static' when compiling an interface with an inner aspect which was not explicitly declared
+		static, see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/162
+	-->
+	<ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_162" vm="1.5" title="inner aspect of interface is implicitly static">
+		<compile files="InterfaceWithInnerClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic.getNumber())' in Type 'InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic'"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(void InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic.main(java.lang.String[]))' in Type 'InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic'"/>
+		</compile>
+		<run class="InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="execution(void InterfaceWithInnerClass.ImplicitlyStatic.main(String[]))"/>
+				<line text="execution(int InterfaceWithInnerClass.ImplicitlyStatic.getNumber())"/>
+				<line text="11"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!--
+		When compiling aspect and target class together, matching works as expected,
+		see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
+	-->
+	<ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_24" vm="1.5" title="exact array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class">
+		<compile files="ExactlyMatchingAspect.aj MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
+			<!-- Even before the bugfix, in this case weaving worked as expected -->
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+		</compile>
+		<run class="MaybeMissingClass">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f1"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f2"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f3"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f4"/>
+				<line text="execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f5"/>
+				<line text="execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f6"/>
+				<line text="execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!--
+		When compiling aspect and target class separately, too many joinpoints are matched,
+		see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
+	-->
+	<ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_24" vm="1.5" title="exact array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class">
+		<compile files="ExactlyMatchingAspect.aj" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" outjar="aspect.jar">
+			<message kind="warning" text="no match for this type name: MaybeMissingClass [Xlint:invalidAbsoluteTypeName]"/>
+			<message kind="warning" text="advice defined in ExactlyMatchingAspect has not been applied [Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch]"/>
+		</compile>
+		<compile files="MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" aspectpath="aspect.jar">
+			<!-- Before the bugfix, f1 would be woven twice, f2 not at all-->
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+		</compile>
+		<run class="MaybeMissingClass" classpath="aspect.jar">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f1"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f2"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f3"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f4"/>
+				<line text="execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f5"/>
+				<line text="execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f6"/>
+				<line text="execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!--
+		When compiling aspect and target class together, too many joinpoints are matched,
+		see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
+	-->
+	<ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_24" vm="1.5" title="fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class">
+		<compile files="FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
+			<!-- Before the bugfix, both f1 and f2 would be woven twice -->
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+		</compile>
+		<run class="MaybeMissingClass">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f1"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f2"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f3"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f4"/>
+				<line text="execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f5"/>
+				<line text="execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f6"/>
+				<line text="execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!--
+		When compiling aspect and target class separately, too many joinpoints are matched,
+		see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
+	-->
+	<ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_24" vm="1.5" title="fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class">
+		<compile files="FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" outjar="aspect.jar">
+			<message kind="warning" text="advice defined in FuzzilyMatchingAspect has not been applied [Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch]"/>
+		</compile>
+		<compile files="MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" aspectpath="aspect.jar">
+			<!-- Before the bugfix, both f1 and f2 would be woven twice -->
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+		</compile>
+		<run class="MaybeMissingClass" classpath="aspect.jar">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f1"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f2"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f3"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f4"/>
+				<line text="execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f5"/>
+				<line text="execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f6"/>
+				<line text="execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!--
+		https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/214
+		https://github.com/mojohaus/aspectj-maven-plugin/issues/164
+		Problem with multiple, subsequent weaving steps and '-Xlint:warning' or '-Xlint:unorderedAdviceAtShadow=warning'
+			java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 1
+			[ERROR] at org.aspectj.weaver.bcel.BcelShadow.prepareForMungers(BcelShadow.java:379)
+			[ERROR] at org.aspectj.weaver.Shadow.implement(Shadow.java:546)
+	-->
+	<ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_214" vm="1.5" title="ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException with Xlint unorderedAdviceAtShadow=warning">
+		<compile files="FirstAspect.java MarkerOne.java" options="-1.8 -showWeaveInfo -Xlint:warning" outjar="first-aspect.jar">
+			<message kind="warning" text="can not build thisJoinPoint lazily for this advice since it has no suitable guard [Xlint:noGuardForLazyTjp]"/>
+			<message kind="warning" text="advice defined in FirstAspect has not been applied [Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch]"/>
+		</compile>
+		<compile files="Application.java MarkerTwo.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo -Xlint:warning" classpath="$sandbox/first-aspect.jar" outjar="application.jar"/>
+		<compile files="SecondAspect.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo -Xlint:warning" aspectpath="first-aspect.jar" inpath="application.jar" outjar="second-aspect.jar">
+			<message kind="warning" text="can not build thisJoinPoint lazily for this advice since it has no suitable guard [Xlint:noGuardForLazyTjp]"/>
+			<message kind="warning" text="at this shadow method-execution(void Application.greet(java.lang.String)) no precedence is specified between advice applying from aspect FirstAspect and aspect SecondAspect [Xlint:unorderedAdviceAtShadow]"/>
+			<message kind="warning" text="can not implement lazyTjp at joinpoint method-execution(void Application.greet(java.lang.String)) because of advice conflicts, see secondary locations to find conflicting advice [Xlint:multipleAdviceStoppingLazyTjp]"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(void Application.greet(java.lang.String))' in Type 'Application' (Application.java:4) advised by around advice from 'SecondAspect'"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(void Application.greet(java.lang.String))' in Type 'Application' (Application.java:4) advised by before advice from 'FirstAspect'"/>
+		</compile>
+		<run class="Application" classpath="$sandbox/second-aspect.jar,$sandbox/first-aspect.jar">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="FirstAspect: execution(void Application.greet(String))"/>
+				<line text="SecondAspect: execution(void Application.greet(String))"/>
+				<line text="Hello world!"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!-- https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/246 -->
+	<ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_246" vm="8" title="add correct annotations to multiple ITD methods with the same name and same number of arguments">
+		<compile files="First.java Second.java App.java ITDAspect.aj" options="-8"/>
+		<run class="App">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="[@Second()] public int App.foo(int[])"/>
+				<line text="[@First()] public void App.foo(java.lang.String)"/>
+				<line text="[] public void App.foo(java.lang.String[])"/>
+				<line text="[@First(), @Second()] public void App.foo(java.lang.Object)"/>
+				<line text="[@Second()] public int App.foo(int)"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!-- https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/250 -->
+	<ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_250" vm="8" title="correctly handle overloaded private methods in aspects">
+		<compile files="MyAspect.aj" options="-8"/>
+		<run class="MyAspect">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="execution(void Application.doSomething())"/>
+				<line text="1 / one"/>
+				<line text="execution(void Application.doSomething())"/>
+				<line text="2"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!-- https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/27761 -->
+	<ajc-test dir="bugs1921/gh_spring_27761" vm="8" title="do not match bridge methods">
+		<!-- (1) Use ASM to generate JpaRepository class with reordered methods -->
+		<compile files="JpaRepositoryDump.java" options="-8"/>
+		<run class="JpaRepositoryDump" options="$sandbox"/>
+		<file deletefile="JpaRepositoryDump.class"/>
+		<!-- (2) Use AJC to compile the remaining classes and run the test -->
+		<compile files="RepositoryAspect.aj" options="-8"/>
+		<run class="RepositoryAspect">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="execution(List RepositoryImpl.saveAll(Iterable))"/>
+				<line text="Saving [One, Two, Three]"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!-- https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/257 -->
+	<ajc-test dir="bugs1921/gh_257" vm="8" title="handle negated type patterns correctly">
+		<compile files="NegatedTypeAspect.aj" options="-8"/>
+		<run class="NegatedTypeAspect">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="[SETTER] execution(void Person.setId(int))"/>
+				<line text="[SETTER] execution(void Person.setFirstName(String))"/>
+				<line text="[SETTER] execution(void Person.setLastName(String))"/>
+				<line text="Person(id=11, lastName='Curie', firstName='Marie')"/>
+				<line text="[GETTER] execution(int Person.getId())"/>
+				<line text="[NON-STRING GETTER] execution(int Person.getId())"/>
+				<line text="[NON-STRING-ARRAY GETTER] execution(int Person.getId())"/>
+				<line text="[NON-STRING-ARRAY-ARRAY GETTER] execution(int Person.getId())"/>
+				<line text="[GETTER] execution(String Person.getFirstName())"/>
+				<line text="[NON-STRING-ARRAY GETTER] execution(String Person.getFirstName())"/>
+				<line text="[NON-STRING-ARRAY-ARRAY GETTER] execution(String Person.getFirstName())"/>
+				<line text="[GETTER] execution(String Person.getLastName())"/>
+				<line text="[NON-STRING-ARRAY GETTER] execution(String Person.getLastName())"/>
+				<line text="[NON-STRING-ARRAY-ARRAY GETTER] execution(String Person.getLastName())"/>
+				<line text="Marie Curie"/>
+				<line text="[SETTER] execution(void Person.setFullName(String))"/>
+				<line text="[SETTER] execution(void Person.setId(int))"/>
+				<line text="Person(id=22, lastName='Einstein', firstName='Albert')"/>
+				<line text="Einstein, Albert"/>
+				<line text="[NON-STRING GETTER] execution(void Person.getVoid())"/>
+				<line text="[NON-STRING-ARRAY GETTER] execution(void Person.getVoid())"/>
+				<line text="[NON-STRING-ARRAY-ARRAY GETTER] execution(void Person.getVoid())"/>
+				<line text="[GETTER] execution(String[] Person.getStringArray())"/>
+				<line text="[NON-STRING GETTER] execution(String[] Person.getStringArray())"/>
+				<line text="[STRING-ARRAY GETTER] execution(String[] Person.getStringArray())"/>
+				<line text="[NON-STRING-ARRAY-ARRAY GETTER] execution(String[] Person.getStringArray())"/>
+				<line text="[Hello, world]"/>
+				<line text="[GETTER] execution(String[][] Person.getStringArrayArray())"/>
+				<line text="[NON-STRING GETTER] execution(String[][] Person.getStringArrayArray())"/>
+				<line text="[NON-STRING-ARRAY GETTER] execution(String[][] Person.getStringArrayArray())"/>
+				<line text="[[Hello, world], [Hallo, Welt]]"/>
+				<line text="AspectJ rules!"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+</suite>

tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1921/sanity-tests-21.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+<!DOCTYPE suite SYSTEM "../tests/ajcTestSuite.dtd"[]>
+
+<suite>
+
+    <!-- empty class -->
+    <ajc-test dir="bugs160/simplejava" title="simple - a">
+      <compile files="SimpleA.java" options="-21"/>
+    </ajc-test>
+
+    <!-- class with one method -->
+    <ajc-test dir="bugs160/simplejava" title="simple - b">
+      <compile files="SimpleB.java" options="-21"/>
+      <run class="SimpleB"/>
+    </ajc-test>
+
+    <!-- empty aspect -->
+    <ajc-test dir="bugs160/simplejava" title="simple - c">
+      <compile files="SimpleC.java" options="-21"/>
+    </ajc-test>
+
+    <!-- simple before -->
+    <ajc-test dir="bugs160/simplejava" title="simple - d">
+      <compile files="SimpleD.java" options="-21"/>
+    </ajc-test>
+
+    <!-- simple itd field -->
+    <ajc-test dir="bugs160/simplejava" title="simple - e">
+      <compile files="SimpleE.java" options="-21"/>
+    </ajc-test>
+
+    <!-- aspect with main calling a static method -->
+    <ajc-test dir="bugs160/simplejava" title="simple - f">
+      <compile files="SimpleF.java" options="-21"/>
+    </ajc-test>
+
+    <!-- pertarget -->
+    <ajc-test dir="bugs160/simplejava" title="simple - g">
+      <compile files="SimpleG.java" options="-21"/>
+    </ajc-test>
+
+    <!-- generic ctor itds -->
+    <ajc-test dir="bugs160/simplejava" title="simple - h">
+      <compile files="SimpleH.java" options="-21"/>
+    </ajc-test>
+
+    <!-- overriding generic itd methods -->
+    <ajc-test dir="bugs160/simplejava" title="simple - i">
+      <compile files="SimpleI.java" options="-21"/>
+    </ajc-test>
+
+    <!-- check class file version is 65.0 (Java 21) -->
+    <ajc-test dir="bugs160/simplejava" title="simple - j">
+      <compile files="SimpleJ.java" options="-21"/>
+    </ajc-test>
+
+    <!-- check class file version is 65.0 (Java 21) -->
+    <ajc-test dir="bugs160/simplejava" title="simple - k">
+      <compile files="SimpleJ.java" options="-source 21"/>
+    </ajc-test>
+
+    <!-- check class file version is 49.0 -->
+    <ajc-test dir="bugs160/simplejava" title="simple - m">
+      <compile files="SimpleJ.java" options="-1.5"/>
+    </ajc-test>
+
+    <ajc-test dir="bugs160/simplejava" title="simple - n">
+      <compile files="SimpleN.java" options="-21"/>
+    </ajc-test>
+
+</suite>

util/src/main/java/org/aspectj/util/LangUtil.java

@@ -191,6 +191,10 @@ public class LangUtil {
 		return 21 <= vmVersion;
 	}
 
+	public static boolean is22VMOrGreater() {
+		return 22 <= vmVersion;
+	}
+
 	/**
 	 * Shorthand for "if null, throw IllegalArgumentException"
 	 *