Browse Source

tests and fix for pr1202212 - poor job of testing modifiers on ITD methods

tags/preDefaultReweavable
acolyer 19 years ago
parent
commit
e29ca52495

+ 66
- 0
org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/InterTypeMethodDeclaration.java View File

@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ import org.aspectj.org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.flow.InitializationFlowCont
import org.aspectj.org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.ClassScope;
import org.aspectj.org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.MethodBinding;
import org.aspectj.org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.ReferenceBinding;
import org.aspectj.org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.SourceTypeBinding;
import org.aspectj.org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.TagBits;
import org.aspectj.org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.TypeBinding;
import org.aspectj.org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.parser.Parser;
@@ -89,6 +90,7 @@ public class InterTypeMethodDeclaration extends InterTypeDeclaration {
public void resolveStatements() {
checkAndSetModifiersForMethod();
if ((modifiers & AccSemicolonBody) != 0) {
if ((declaredModifiers & AccAbstract) == 0)
scope.problemReporter().methodNeedBody(this);
@@ -275,4 +277,68 @@ public class InterTypeMethodDeclaration extends InterTypeDeclaration {
protected Shadow.Kind getShadowKindForBody() {
return Shadow.MethodExecution;
}
// XXX this code is copied from MethodScope, with a few adjustments for ITDs...
private void checkAndSetModifiersForMethod() {
// for reported problems, we want the user to see the declared selector
char[] realSelector = this.selector;
this.selector = declaredSelector;
final ReferenceBinding declaringClass = this.binding.declaringClass;
if ((declaredModifiers & AccAlternateModifierProblem) != 0)
scope.problemReporter().duplicateModifierForMethod(onTypeBinding, this);

// after this point, tests on the 16 bits reserved.
int realModifiers = declaredModifiers & AccJustFlag;

// check for abnormal modifiers
int unexpectedModifiers = ~(AccPublic | AccPrivate | AccProtected
| AccAbstract | AccStatic | AccFinal | AccSynchronized | AccNative | AccStrictfp);
if ((realModifiers & unexpectedModifiers) != 0) {
scope.problemReporter().illegalModifierForMethod(this);
declaredModifiers &= ~AccJustFlag | ~unexpectedModifiers;
}

// check for incompatible modifiers in the visibility bits, isolate the visibility bits
int accessorBits = realModifiers & (AccPublic | AccProtected | AccPrivate);
if ((accessorBits & (accessorBits - 1)) != 0) {
scope.problemReporter().illegalVisibilityModifierCombinationForMethod(onTypeBinding, this);

// need to keep the less restrictive so disable Protected/Private as necessary
if ((accessorBits & AccPublic) != 0) {
if ((accessorBits & AccProtected) != 0)
declaredModifiers &= ~AccProtected;
if ((accessorBits & AccPrivate) != 0)
declaredModifiers &= ~AccPrivate;
} else if ((accessorBits & AccProtected) != 0 && (accessorBits & AccPrivate) != 0) {
declaredModifiers &= ~AccPrivate;
}
}

// check for modifiers incompatible with abstract modifier
if ((declaredModifiers & AccAbstract) != 0) {
int incompatibleWithAbstract = AccStatic | AccFinal | AccSynchronized | AccNative | AccStrictfp;
if ((declaredModifiers & incompatibleWithAbstract) != 0)
scope.problemReporter().illegalAbstractModifierCombinationForMethod(onTypeBinding, this);
if (!onTypeBinding.isAbstract())
scope.problemReporter().abstractMethodInAbstractClass((SourceTypeBinding) onTypeBinding, this);
}

/* DISABLED for backward compatibility with javac (if enabled should also mark private methods as final)
// methods from a final class are final : 8.4.3.3
if (methodBinding.declaringClass.isFinal())
modifiers |= AccFinal;
*/
// native methods cannot also be tagged as strictfp
if ((declaredModifiers & AccNative) != 0 && (declaredModifiers & AccStrictfp) != 0)
scope.problemReporter().nativeMethodsCannotBeStrictfp(onTypeBinding, this);

// static members are only authorized in a static member or top level type
if (((realModifiers & AccStatic) != 0) && declaringClass.isNestedType() && !declaringClass.isStatic())
scope.problemReporter().unexpectedStaticModifierForMethod(onTypeBinding, this);

// restore the true selector now that any problems have been reported
this.selector = realSelector;
}
}

+ 22
- 0
tests/bugs150/pr102212.aj View File

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
interface Interface {}
abstract class Parent {}
class Child extends Parent implements Interface {}

public aspect pr102212 {
// illegal modifier combination not caught by ajc
public abstract synchronized void Parent._abstract();

public synchronized void Child._abstract() {}


// the following is legal - it's a default implementation....
public /* implicit abstract */ synchronized void Interface._interface() {}


// use Child to make java complain: "illegal modifiers: 0x421"
// (this corresponds to "public abstract synchronized")
public static void main(String[] args) {
new Child();
}
}


+ 5
- 0
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/Ajc150Tests.java View File

@@ -369,6 +369,11 @@ public class Ajc150Tests extends org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase {
public void testOverrideAndCovarianceWithDecPRuntimeMultiFiles() {
runTest("override and covariance with decp - runtime separate files");
}
public void testAbstractSynchronizedITDMethods() {
runTest("abstract synchronized itdms not detected");
}
// helper methods.....
public SyntheticRepository createRepos(File cpentry) {

+ 6
- 0
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/ajc150.xml View File

@@ -456,6 +456,12 @@
</stdout>
</run>
</ajc-test>
<ajc-test dir="bugs150" pr="102212" title="abstract synchronized itdms not detected">
<compile files="pr102212.aj">
<message line="7" kind="error" text="The abstract method _abstract in type Parent can only set a visibility modifier, one of public or protected"/>
</compile>
</ajc-test>
<!-- ============================================================================ -->
<!-- ============================================================================ -->

Loading…
Cancel
Save