Strip down compiler messages to AspectJ-specific ones
Delete all properties from messages_aspectj.properties which were just
copied from Eclipse and basically the same. This not only gets rid of
duplicates but also eliminates differences found between upstream and
AspectJ strings which were just cause by errors or oversights during
manual upgrade.
TODO:
- Find a way to print the '-X' options as info instead of yielding
'abort', making it seem as if compilation failed and print the usage
message to stdErr instead of stdOut.
- Eclipse also has misc.usage.warn, not just misc.usage, i.e. usage
info specifically for warning options. Make sure that AspectJ uses
it consistently.
- Find a way to merge AspectJ-specific options into the standard
Eclipse usage text instead of completely replacing it, further
reducing the need to merge and copy upstream content.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Reports on declarations of Collection variables made by using the collection class as the type, rather than an appropriate interface.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports Collection.addAll() and Map.putAll() calls after instantiation of a collection using a constructor call without arguments. Such constructs can be replaced with a single call to a parametrized constructor which simplifies code. Also for some collections the replacement might be more performant.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
There are two styles to convert a collection to an array: either using a pre-sized array (like c.toArray(new String[c.size()])) or using an empty array (like c.toArray(new String[0]).
In older Java versions using pre-sized array was recommended, as the reflection call which is necessary to create an array of proper size was quite slow. However since late updates of OpenJDK 6 this call was intrinsified, making the performance of the empty array version the same and sometimes even better, compared to the pre-sized version. Also passing pre-sized array is dangerous for a concurrent or synchronized collection as a data race is possible between the size and toArray call which may result in extra nulls at the end of the array, if the collection was concurrently shrunk during the operation.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports the copying of array contents to a collection where each element is added individually using a for loop. Such constructs may be replaced by a call to Collection.addAll(Arrays.asList()) or Collections.addAll().
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports "unboxing", e.g. explicit unwrapping of wrapped primitive values. Unboxing is unnecessary under Java 5 and newer, and can be safely removed.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports explicit boxing, i.e. wrapping of primitive values in objects. Explicit manual boxing is unnecessary under Java 5 and newer, and can be safely removed.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
'String.indexOf()' expression is replaceable with 'contains()'
Reports any String.indexOf() expressions which can be replaced with a call to the String.contains() method available in Java 5 and newer.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports while loops which iterate over collections, and can be replaced with an enhanced for loop (i.e. foreach iteration syntax).
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports for loops which iterate over collections or arrays, and can be replaced with an enhanced for loop (i.e. the foreach iteration syntax).
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
More testcases for overweaving and better handling of WeaverStateInfo
to avoid the dreaded problems deserialized the 'special key' used
to store diffs.
With these changes once a class is woven via overweaving we switch
the diff we store in the weaverstateinfo to 0 byte array (indicating
overweaving happened for later weavers that see it). We also stop
writing the special 'key' into the attribute and avoid looking-for
and attempting to replace it at the end of weaving.
Initial cut at bug 535086 - pertypewithin and non vis types
In this version unless you specify an aspect is privileged then the
pertypewithin clause will not match types not visible from the aspect
(private types or default vis types in another package)
Debating whether to change this to not require privileged.
Bug#531694: generate more optional thisJoinPoint construction code
This commit introduces some new methods into the
runtime Factory class and modifies code generation
to use them (and to use the form of the LDC bytecode
that loads class constants).
The version handling in LangUtil has been overhauled
to cope better with post 1.8 releases (JDK9 and JDK10 or 18.3
or whatever they call it). As part of this moved
to treating JDK9 as '9' rather than '1.9'. Also removed
duplicate version processing logic and had that defer to
the one place in LangUtil where we now deal with it.
Includes some generics tidyup in ajdoc. More ajdoc work
is necessary for Java10 because it removes the standard doclet
(old style). However trying to invoke the internal Javadoc
handler in Java10 is failing due to module visibility rules.
Alexander Kriegisch
Jerry James
Lars Grefer
Andy Clement