Optimize class loading - make backward compatible with legacy behaviour
Now the defaults are:
+ org.aspectj.apache.bcel.useSingleRepositoryInstance (default: false)
+ org.aspectj.apache.bcel.useUnavailableClassesCache (default: false)
+ org.aspectj.apache.bcel.ignoreCacheClearRequests (default: false)
I.e. the new caching optimisations are opt-in instead of opt-out as
originally designed. This might change in the future, but for now
without any additional tests and experience with the new feature let us
be conservative and make the build green first.
I also added a few more code review findings concerning backward
compatibility, which was less than 100% even with all three flags
deactivated.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
In our project we found out that during the build up of the spring context
the class loading takes a very long time.
Root cause is the huge amount of file I/O during pointcut class loading.
We are taking about ~250k file loads.
With these changes we managed to cut down the starting time by around 50%.
What we found out is that IMHO - the clear method of the ClassLoaderRepository
is called far too often -> in our settings this resulted in not a single cache
hit as the cache got cleared permanently.
Therefore we de-actived the cache clear calls inside the ClassLoaderRepository.
Secondly we changed the Java15AnnotationFinder in a way to not always create
new objects for the ClassLoaderRepository but re-use one static instance.
Otherwise we experienced >100k objects being created.
Last but not least we introduced a cache for unavailable classes so that
they do not have to be looked up using file I/O over and over again.
The whole behavior is configurable via
+ org.aspectj.apache.bcel.useSingleRepositoryInstance (default: true)
+ org.aspectj.apache.bcel.useUnavailableClassesCache (default: true)
+ org.aspectj.apache.bcel.ignoreCacheClearRequests (default: true)
Signed-off-by: Stefan Starke <stefan@starkeweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
The class ConstantDynamic was incorrectly using the `InvokeDynamic` tag
during construction which meant after reading in code containing a
`Dynamic` reference, it would incorrectly be written out as an
`InvokeDynamic` reference. There is not much code out there using
Dynamic so wasn't uncovered before.
Fixes #68
Trailing whitespaces are useless. Most of code-styles forbids them. Most of editors always trim them on save.
I propose to clean up project from trailing whitespaces in all java files at once.
Make BCEL classpath utility recognise Java 16-19, fixing many tests
This is a follow-up commit on @07af5d41:
Inside org.aspectj.apache.bcel.util.ClassPath.getClassPath(), some JVM
version matching occurs which previously did not include Java 16 (I also
added 17-19 to the regex matcher). This fixes test errors like:
java.lang.ClassCastException:
class org.aspectj.weaver.MissingResolvedTypeWithKnownSignature
cannot be cast to class
org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType
(org.aspectj.weaver.MissingResolvedTypeWithKnownSignature and
org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType are in unnamed module
of loader 'app')
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Add Java 16 test suite for AspectJ 1.9.7 + test refactorings
- Test all features which were preview in 14+15 and are now final in 16,
compiling them with language level 16.
- For Java 15 we only have sanity tests (and of course the Java <14
tests), compiling Java 16 features to target 15 does not seem to work.
- Test remaining Java 16 preview feature (sealed classes).
- Instead of overriding runTest(String) in several base classes like
XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava*Only or XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava*OrLater,
we now override setUp() from JUnit's TestCase base class. This will
run before runTest(String) and make the tests fail much faster, if a
user tries to run them on the wrong VM.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Make BCEL classpath utility recognise Java 15, fixing many tests
Inside org.aspectj.apache.bcel.util.ClassPath.getClassPath(), some JVM
version matching occurs which previously did not include Java 15.
Technically, AspectJ 1.9.6 does not support Java 15, but on GitHub
Actions there is a build job running on a JVM 15. This change should at
least make the weaver tests pass, making that test job more meaningful.
This fixes test errors like
java.lang.ClassCastException:
class org.aspectj.weaver.MissingResolvedTypeWithKnownSignature
cannot be cast to class
org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType
(org.aspectj.weaver.MissingResolvedTypeWithKnownSignature and
org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType are in unnamed module
of loader 'app')
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Reports on declarations of Collection variables made by using the collection class as the type, rather than an appropriate interface.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports Collection.addAll() and Map.putAll() calls after instantiation of a collection using a constructor call without arguments. Such constructs can be replaced with a single call to a parametrized constructor which simplifies code. Also for some collections the replacement might be more performant.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
There are two styles to convert a collection to an array: either using a pre-sized array (like c.toArray(new String[c.size()])) or using an empty array (like c.toArray(new String[0]).
In older Java versions using pre-sized array was recommended, as the reflection call which is necessary to create an array of proper size was quite slow. However since late updates of OpenJDK 6 this call was intrinsified, making the performance of the empty array version the same and sometimes even better, compared to the pre-sized version. Also passing pre-sized array is dangerous for a concurrent or synchronized collection as a data race is possible between the size and toArray call which may result in extra nulls at the end of the array, if the collection was concurrently shrunk during the operation.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports common usage patterns of java.util.Map that could be replaced with Java 8 methods: getOrDefault(), computeIfAbsent(), putIfAbsent(), merge(), or replaceAll().
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Collections.sort() can be replaced with List.sort()
Reports calls to Collections.sort(list, comparator) which could be replaced with list.sort(comparator).
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports the copying of array contents to a collection where each element is added individually using a for loop. Such constructs may be replaced by a call to Collection.addAll(Arrays.asList()) or Collections.addAll().
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports "unboxing", e.g. explicit unwrapping of wrapped primitive values. Unboxing is unnecessary under Java 5 and newer, and can be safely removed.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports explicit boxing, i.e. wrapping of primitive values in objects. Explicit manual boxing is unnecessary under Java 5 and newer, and can be safely removed.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
'String.indexOf()' expression is replaceable with 'contains()'
Reports any String.indexOf() expressions which can be replaced with a call to the String.contains() method available in Java 5 and newer.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports while loops which iterate over collections, and can be replaced with an enhanced for loop (i.e. foreach iteration syntax).
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports for loops which iterate over collections or arrays, and can be replaced with an enhanced for loop (i.e. the foreach iteration syntax).
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Change the mehtod name "containsField" to "findsField".
The method implements finding a field object in the 'fieldsList' with a given name. If found, return the found field object, otherwise return null.
Thus, rename the method as "findsField" should be more clear than "containsField" since "containsField" is prone to ask whether the "fieldsFile" contains a field or not and return true or false.
Signed-off-by: Kui Liu <brucekuiliu@gmail.com>
Bug#531694: generate more optional thisJoinPoint construction code
This commit introduces some new methods into the
runtime Factory class and modifies code generation
to use them (and to use the form of the LDC bytecode
that loads class constants).
Andrey Turbanov
Alexander Kriegisch
Andy Clement
Stefan Starke
Dmitry Mikhaylov
Lars Grefer
Kui Liu