Some new code in JDT is using the information in here, so need
to resolve them.

clone is saying it is protected rather than public and so we need
to add a guard to avoid creating accessor for it.

If an anonymous class calls a method ITD'd onto one of its own
supertypes (e.g. new A() { xx(null); }) then it can be reported
as an ambiguous method invocation on Java8. There is different
handling for Java8 that is revealing an issue. The intertype
method declarations are recorded in a member finder attached to the
target type (A in this case). When the local type binding is
built it gets all the methods from supertypes added to it - this
unfortunately includes the ITD method.  Then later when something
asks for all 'xx' methods on A, it finds the ITD method from when
A was constructed and an additional copy from the member finder.

The quick fix is for the member finder to use a set rather than
list when answering 'what are the xx methods'. If this proves
a problem down the line the deeper fix would be to avoid including
ITDs when the local type binding is built.

Issue: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=474165

Modified test expectation system so it is possible to say
the test cares about one particular message and the rest
do not matter (prefix message string with '*') - crude but
quick.

Polished many places to exploit generics

Upgraded all the tests to work on Java8 - some serious changes
regarding ajdoc on Java8. Hopefully it has stayed backwards
compatible with earlier JDK versions (e.g. if using AspectJ 1.8.3+
with a JDK less than 8) but no explicit testing done for this.

Signed-off-by: hsestupin <stupin.sergey@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: hsestupin <stupin.sergey@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: hsestupin <stupin.sergey@gmail.com>