StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. StringBuilder is a direct replacement to StringBuffer which generally have better performance.

This was required by the Eclipse team as one precondition for the next
release.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

In two places, the documentation now contains this text:

"Since AspectJ 1.9.7, the obsolete Oracle/BEA JRockit agent is no longer
part of AspectJ. JRockit JDK never supported Java versions higher than
1.6. Several JRockit JVM features are now part of HotSpot and tools like
Mission Control available for OpenJDK and Oracle JDK."

The decision to drop JRockit support was made during a discussion
between Alexander Kriegisch and Andy Clement:

Andy Clement wrote on 26 Mar 2021:

> Yes I think so.
>
>
> Alexander Kriegisch wrote on 26 Mar 2021:
>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JRockit
>>
>> Can we get rid of that? AspectJ requires Java 8, JRockit never
>> supported more than Java 6.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

It was the only subdirectory under lib/ext anyway and somehow always
irritating and difficult to find when just using a directory browser in
the IDE.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>

There are two styles to convert a collection to an array: either using a pre-sized array (like c.toArray(new String[c.size()])) or using an empty array (like c.toArray(new String[0]).
In older Java versions using pre-sized array was recommended, as the reflection call which is necessary to create an array of proper size was quite slow. However since late updates of OpenJDK 6 this call was intrinsified, making the performance of the empty array version the same and sometimes even better, compared to the pre-sized version. Also passing pre-sized array is dangerous for a concurrent or synchronized collection as a data race is possible between the size and toArray call which may result in extra nulls at the end of the array, if the collection was concurrently shrunk during the operation.

Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>

Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>

Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>

Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>

Reports any String.indexOf() expressions which can be replaced with a call to the String.contains() method available in Java 5 and newer.

Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>

Reports for loops which iterate over collections or arrays, and can be replaced with an enhanced for loop (i.e. the foreach iteration syntax).

Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>

This alters the defineClass used when loadtime weaving and defining
'extra' classes (e.g. closures). This change causes us to call
the defineClass() method variant on ClassLoader that takes a
protection domain, so it should share the same protection domain as
the class for which the extra class was generated.

Issue: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=542421