This fixes:
- negating annotation style if() pointcuts doesn't work
- annotation style if() pointcut not able to use a binding
that is not exposed
Fixes #120,#122
Methods Integer.parseInt/Boolean.parseBoolean should be preferred over Integer.valueOf/Boolean.valueOf/ if final result is primitive.
They are generally faster and generate less garbage.
Trailing whitespaces are useless. Most of code-styles forbids them. Most of editors always trim them on save.
I propose to clean up project from trailing whitespaces in all java files at once.
This is a bugfix release, reverting the essential parts of commit
f70aeb5e, because it causes AspectJ Maven integration tests using
javadoc to fail on JDK 8.
See commit discussion on
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/commit/f70aeb5e#commitcomment-51417353
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Before, we used 1.9.7.BUILD-SNAPSHOT, which according to Andy Clement
was originally an intent across a group of Spring projects he was
involved in, to ensure that SNAPSHOTS were sorted alphabetically ahead
of MILESTONEs and ahead of RCs.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Remove redundant 'name' and 'packaging' tags from POMs
If 'name' is identical to 'artifactId' and 'packaging' has the default
value 'jar', we can just remove those tags from the POM.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Clean up Maven dependencies using 'dependency:analyze' goal
Notably, this change involves a partial revert of @4a5660b3, because we
are not using JUnit Jupiter yet but still JUnit 4 tests. See discussion
under commit at https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/commit/4a5660b3.
Many other warnings - concerning both used undeclared and unused
declared dependencies - were eliminated by adding or removing the
corresponding dependencies from the POMs. Furthermore, I tried to make
sure that some clearly test-scoped dependencies are now actually
declared as such, so as to avoid unwanted transitivity bleeding into
compile scope and maybe unwanted classes ending up in uber JARs via
Maven Shade or Maven Assembly.
TODO: I am not so sure why modules other than 'run-all-unit-tests' would
depend on test JARs. I hope I broke nothing essential there. As of
today, the other modules where I found '<type>test-jar</type>'
dependencies are:
- ajde
- testing
- testing-drivers
- tests
- weaver
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Replace system-scoped dependency on commons by granular dependencies
There are only two direct dependencies used in AspectJ code:
- Commons Digester (module 'testing')
- Commons Logging (module 'org.aspectj.matcher')
I declared those two and experimentally removed all the other
system-scoped dependencies, as it should be. Let's see if the build
works with transitive dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Strip down compiler messages to AspectJ-specific ones
Delete all properties from messages_aspectj.properties which were just
copied from Eclipse and basically the same. This not only gets rid of
duplicates but also eliminates differences found between upstream and
AspectJ strings which were just cause by errors or oversights during
manual upgrade.
TODO:
- Find a way to print the '-X' options as info instead of yielding
'abort', making it seem as if compilation failed and print the usage
message to stdErr instead of stdOut.
- Eclipse also has misc.usage.warn, not just misc.usage, i.e. usage
info specifically for warning options. Make sure that AspectJ uses
it consistently.
- Find a way to merge AspectJ-specific options into the standard
Eclipse usage text instead of completely replacing it, further
reducing the need to merge and copy upstream content.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Reports on declarations of Collection variables made by using the collection class as the type, rather than an appropriate interface.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports Collection.addAll() and Map.putAll() calls after instantiation of a collection using a constructor call without arguments. Such constructs can be replaced with a single call to a parametrized constructor which simplifies code. Also for some collections the replacement might be more performant.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
There are two styles to convert a collection to an array: either using a pre-sized array (like c.toArray(new String[c.size()])) or using an empty array (like c.toArray(new String[0]).
In older Java versions using pre-sized array was recommended, as the reflection call which is necessary to create an array of proper size was quite slow. However since late updates of OpenJDK 6 this call was intrinsified, making the performance of the empty array version the same and sometimes even better, compared to the pre-sized version. Also passing pre-sized array is dangerous for a concurrent or synchronized collection as a data race is possible between the size and toArray call which may result in extra nulls at the end of the array, if the collection was concurrently shrunk during the operation.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports the copying of array contents to a collection where each element is added individually using a for loop. Such constructs may be replaced by a call to Collection.addAll(Arrays.asList()) or Collections.addAll().
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Alexander Kriegisch
Andrey Turbanov
Andy Clement
Jerry James
Lars Grefer