Add decade 2020-2029 to copyright years in Checklics
FWIW, I just wanted to know if the tests in module 'build' would still
pass. They did not find copyrights for more recent years, so I added
them here.
But I am still unsure, if we need these tests at all. Obviously, they
were not running during CI builds, i.e. they seem to be non-essential.
But chances are, they were forgotten to be added to the suite.
BTW, running the tests in module 'build' with '-Drun.build.tests=true'
is failing, too, because some old JDK classes looked up there no longer
exist in more recent JDKs.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Globally replace "http:" by "https:" in non-XML files
Maybe, the XML files and Maven wrapper files will follow. First, let us
find out if this breaks the build, maybe some tests are asserting on
"http:". But there, the replacement would also have taken place, so
probably it just works.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Update InstallContext.onWindowsPro for Windows 11+
The matcher is more future-proof now, as long as Windows names stay
"Windows Server.*" and "Windows [1-8][0-9]?".
This is not beautiful, but a quick drive-by improvement.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
- AspectJ Browser (ajbrowser)
- Forte IDE integration
- JBuilder IDE integration
- Emacs integration
All this information was old and outdated. Ajbrowser was removed from
AspectJ a while ago. If the other tools even still exist, any possibly
existing AspectJ support is not part of AspectJ itself.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
In two places, the documentation now contains this text:
"Since AspectJ 1.9.7, the obsolete Oracle/BEA JRockit agent is no longer
part of AspectJ. JRockit JDK never supported Java versions higher than
1.6. Several JRockit JVM features are now part of HotSpot and tools like
Mission Control available for OpenJDK and Oracle JDK."
The decision to drop JRockit support was made during a discussion
between Alexander Kriegisch and Andy Clement:
Andy Clement wrote on 26 Mar 2021:
> Yes I think so.
>
>
> Alexander Kriegisch wrote on 26 Mar 2021:
>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JRockit
>>
>> Can we get rid of that? AspectJ requires Java 8, JRockit never
>> supported more than Java 6.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Support Windows 10 and Windows Server 2016/2019 in installer
Those versions were not detected until now, which lead to bogus Windows
batch files forwarding only 9 Ajc parameters to the Java process via
"%1 %2 %3 %4 %5 %6 %7 %8 %9" instead of "%*".
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Reports on declarations of Collection variables made by using the collection class as the type, rather than an appropriate interface.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports Collection.addAll() and Map.putAll() calls after instantiation of a collection using a constructor call without arguments. Such constructs can be replaced with a single call to a parametrized constructor which simplifies code. Also for some collections the replacement might be more performant.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
There are two styles to convert a collection to an array: either using a pre-sized array (like c.toArray(new String[c.size()])) or using an empty array (like c.toArray(new String[0]).
In older Java versions using pre-sized array was recommended, as the reflection call which is necessary to create an array of proper size was quite slow. However since late updates of OpenJDK 6 this call was intrinsified, making the performance of the empty array version the same and sometimes even better, compared to the pre-sized version. Also passing pre-sized array is dangerous for a concurrent or synchronized collection as a data race is possible between the size and toArray call which may result in extra nulls at the end of the array, if the collection was concurrently shrunk during the operation.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Collections.sort() can be replaced with List.sort()
Reports calls to Collections.sort(list, comparator) which could be replaced with list.sort(comparator).
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
'String.indexOf()' expression is replaceable with 'contains()'
Reports any String.indexOf() expressions which can be replaced with a call to the String.contains() method available in Java 5 and newer.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports for loops which iterate over collections or arrays, and can be replaced with an enhanced for loop (i.e. the foreach iteration syntax).
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Alexander Kriegisch
Andrey Turbanov
Lars Grefer
Andy Clement
Andy Clement
Andy Clement
aclement