Add decade 2020-2029 to copyright years in Checklics
FWIW, I just wanted to know if the tests in module 'build' would still
pass. They did not find copyrights for more recent years, so I added
them here.
But I am still unsure, if we need these tests at all. Obviously, they
were not running during CI builds, i.e. they seem to be non-essential.
But chances are, they were forgotten to be added to the suite.
BTW, running the tests in module 'build' with '-Drun.build.tests=true'
is failing, too, because some old JDK classes looked up there no longer
exist in more recent JDKs.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Globally replace "http:" by "https:" in non-XML files
Maybe, the XML files and Maven wrapper files will follow. First, let us
find out if this breaks the build, maybe some tests are asserting on
"http:". But there, the replacement would also have taken place, so
probably it just works.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Update InstallContext.onWindowsPro for Windows 11+
The matcher is more future-proof now, as long as Windows names stay
"Windows Server.*" and "Windows [1-8][0-9]?".
This is not beautiful, but a quick drive-by improvement.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
- Redundant copies of HTML files used in AspectJ installer, which
already exist as resource files in module 'build'
- Null-sized AspectJ library JARs which probably were used to trigger
certain build steps in the former Ant build
- BridgeVersion.java.txt, which has been replaced by a regular
org.aspectj.bridge.Version class which can dynamically determine
versions from a properties file instead of relying on them being
hard-coded into the template.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
- AspectJ Browser (ajbrowser)
- Forte IDE integration
- JBuilder IDE integration
- Emacs integration
All this information was old and outdated. Ajbrowser was removed from
AspectJ a while ago. If the other tools even still exist, any possibly
existing AspectJ support is not part of AspectJ itself.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
- The website is just a front page.
- I failed to contact anyone via:
* fb9553b7471df638478bbf918044bf52.gdrp@customers.whoisprivacycorp.com
* info@aosd.net
* admin@aosd.net
- The discuss@aosd.net mailing list had its last post 6 years ago and
the last one concerning AspectJ 11 years ago according to the archive
at https://discuss.aosd.narkive.com/.
Mention Spring support for native AspectJ an Spring AOP as a real world
example in the FAQ.
Also remove an FAQ link to a no longer existing PARC website about
AspectJ and fix a small typo.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Currently, the situation looks more like a Java 21 maintenance release
than directly a Java 22 release.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Alexander Kriegisch
Andrey Turbanov
Andy Clement