Fix #366085 concerning declared annotations with source retention
See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=366085.
See https://stackoverflow.com/q/74618269/1082681.
The issue described in the Bugzilla issue is about 'declare @type', but
similar issues also existed for 'declare @field', 'declare @method',
'declare @constructor'. This fix is rather superficial and leaves
things to be desired, because it is rather hacky and simply ignores
errors source retention annotation declarations during weaving. A better
fix would drop the corresponding declarations while parsing and also
issue compiler warnings in each case.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
OutputSpec.matchesThisVm better supports version ranges
vmVersionRanges might be a single version like "9", a list of versions
like "1.2,1.3,1.4,1.5", an equivalent range of "1.2-1.5", an open range
like "-1.8", "9-" (equivalent to "9+") or a more complex list of ranges
like "-1.6,9-11,13-14,17-" or "8,11,16+".
Empty ranges like in "", " ", "8,,14", ",5", "6-," will be ignored.
I.e., they will not yield a positive match.
Bogus ranges like "9-11-14" will be ignored, too.
Existing XML test specs using '<line text="..." vm="v,v2,...,vn"/>
have been adjusted to use version ranges rather than long lists of
consecutive versions. Furthermore, ranges with a trailing '+' like '14+'
were replaced by using the new canonical format '14-', even though the
parser still correctly recognises '14+'.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
For now, only the "pattern matching for switch" tests from previews 1
and 2 were adjusted to work in preview 3, because guarded patterns were
replaced by 'when' clauses in 'switch' blocks. Therefore, existing test
classes did not compile anymore and had to be replaced by syntactically
upgraded versions with content merged from preview 1 and 2 classes.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Firstly, Batik is not needed for running AspectJ tests.
Secondly, the fixed Windows path separators led to GitHub CI/CD tests
failing under Java 18+ on GitHub. Replacing ';' by 'File.pathSeparator'
would have fixed the problem, but removing the paths altogether is the
cleaner solution.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
This fixes a partial path traversal vulnerability.
Replaces `dir.getCanonicalPath().startsWith(parent.getCanonicalPath())`, which is vulnerable to partial path traversal attacks, with the more secure `dir.getCanonicalFile().toPath().startsWith(parent.getCanonicalFile().toPath())`.
To demonstrate this vulnerability, consider `"/usr/outnot".startsWith("/usr/out")`.
The check is bypassed although `/outnot` is not under the `/out` directory.
It's important to understand that the terminating slash may be removed when using various `String` representations of the `File` object.
For example, on Linux, `println(new File("/var"))` will print `/var`, but `println(new File("/var", "/")` will print `/var/`;
however, `println(new File("/var", "/").getCanonicalPath())` will print `/var`.
Weakness: CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
Severity: Medium
CVSSS: 6.1
Detection: CodeQL & OpenRewrite (https://public.moderne.io/recipes/org.openrewrite.java.security.PartialPathTraversalVulnerability)
Reported-by: Jonathan Leitschuh <Jonathan.Leitschuh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Leitschuh <Jonathan.Leitschuh@gmail.com>
Bug-tracker: https://github.com/JLLeitschuh/security-research/issues/13
Co-authored-by: Moderne <team@moderne.io>
Make IStateListener.aboutToCompareClasspaths use typed lists
Before, the signature was:
void aboutToCompareClasspaths(
List oldClasspath, List newClasspath);
Now it is:
void aboutToCompareClasspaths(
List<String> oldClasspath, List<String> newClasspath);
AJDT will also use the typed version after generics refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Add some smoke test cases for '--add-reads' and '--add-modules'
in order to show that the compiler options basically work. The test
cases are by no means exhaustive and simply verify that it works at all.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Add test case + experimental fix for AJC option '--add-exports'
I am expecting the test case to pass, but other tests to fail. This
temporary commit is meant to create feedback from GitHub CI test runs.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Name annotation vs native style aspects uniformly in github_128 tests
Trying to find the difference between byte code generated by AJC for
functionally identical annotation vs native style aspect, I move the
aspects into subdirectories in order to be able to name them
identically. This way, when decompiling them with javap or Fernflower it
is easier to diff them later.
Why the decompilation? Because for the thread pool testing scenario
native syntax passes while annotation syntax fails. I.e., we need to
find the difference. That can be done by reading source code, if you
know where to look, or by starting with reverse engineering in order to
first understand more and look at the code later.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Expand "asynchronous proceed for nested around-advice" to 4 scenarios:
1. @AspectJ syntax, threads created inside advice code
2. @AspectJ syntax, submit runnable to thread pool
3. native syntax, threads created inside advice code
4. native syntax, submit runnable to thread pool
Scenarios 1, 3 and 4 are passing, while 2 is failing.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
AtAjLTWTests: 4 test cases switched to 'useFullLTW' mode
After the Java 18 JDT Core upgrade, some LTW tests are failing and
have to be switched from in-process to full LTW mode due to them now
obviously calling some code paths which need '--add-opens'.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Regression test for #125: Bugs198Tests.testGitHub_125
This test fails when run against AspectJ 1.9.8 with JDT Core 1.9.8.RC3.
It passes when using the latest JDT Core 1.9.9-SNAPSHOT. It sets system
property 'org.aspectj.weaver.openarchives=20', provoking open classpath
JAR file exhaustion when compiling a simple class with AJC, i.e. JARs
are being forcibly closed and automatically re-opened, as soon as they
are needed. Before the JDT Core bugfix, this test causes:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at ....compiler.batch.ClasspathJmod.getModulesDeclaringPackage
With the bugfix incorporated into AspectJ Tools, the problem is gone.
Note: New test dependency 'io.github.bmuskalla:scoped-system-properties'
helps to test compilation with the temporarily changed global system
property in isolation, saving the environment in a thread-local
variable and later cleanly restoring the original values again. If we
ever switch to parallel test execution, this would otherwise influence
other tests and potentially cause weird side effects. Better safe than
sorry.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Move some tests from Ajc198TestsJava to Bugs198Tests
They were accidentally stored in thw wrong test class, not just because
they are bug regression tests, not 1.9.8 features, but also because they
are meant to work on Java 5+, not on Java 17+ like the ones in
Ajc198TestsJava.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
This fixes:
- negating annotation style if() pointcuts doesn't work
- annotation style if() pointcut not able to use a binding
that is not exposed
Fixes #120,#122
Fix annotation style support for if(true) and if(false)
The documentation specifies annotation style pointcuts
can use if(false) or if(true) and not require a boolean
return value and body for the @Pointcut annotated
method but it doesn't work without this change to validation
that recognizes the situation.
Fixes #115
Trailing whitespaces are useless. Most of code-styles forbids them. Most of editors always trim them on save.
I propose to clean up project from trailing whitespaces in all java files at once.
The test worked on my local workstation with German locale, but not on
GitHub with English locale.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Update ECJ version, activate Java 17 preview features tests
After JDT Core (ECJ) was updated to the final Java 17 feature set, the
tests now pass as expected.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
- Fix one fault sanity test configuration
- Deactivate Java 16 preview tests (no longer supported by Java 17
compiler)
- Test sealed classes as final on Java 17 (no longer preview)
- Add tests for JEP 406, pattern matching for switch (preview). At
present, the beta 17 branch of JDT Core does not handle the tested
features and expected compile errors correctly yet, so I had to
temporarily deactivate test execution, only printing TODO messages.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Make all tests run on Java 16 via '-add-opens' JVM option
Due to JEP 260 (Encapsulate Most Internal APIs), aspect weaving on
Java 16 now requires '--add-opens java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED' on
the command line. Otherwise there will be illegal access exceptions for
some internal API calls AspectJ needs, most prominently when trying to
define classes in other packages or modules.
This had to be done on several levels:
- Maven Surefire: running tests in a JVM directly forked by Surefire.
In order to make this backwards compatible, I added two profiles
with JDK-level-dependent auto-activation, one 8-15 and one 16+. In
the latter a property containing the JVM parameter is defined, in
the former it is empty, i.e. the JVM is started without the
parameter. In Java 8 the parameter did not even exist, in Java 9+ we
could use it, but we need to test how users use AspectJ.
- RunSpec: Whenever an XML test is declared to use '<run>', we need to
determine the current JVM version and again dynamically add the
parameter when forking the target JVM.
- AntSpec: Whenever an XML test is declared to use '<ant>', we need to
determine the current JVM version dynamically add two properties
usable from within Ant scripts: 'aj.addOpensKey' and
'aj.addOpensValue'. Unfortunately, Ant needs to use two '<argLine>'
parameters, because the two parts of the option are separated by a
space character.
- Ant scripts: When triggered by an AntSpec, each Ant target using LTW
needs to manually set
<jvmarg value="${aj.addOpensKey}"/>
<jvmarg value="${aj.addOpensValue}"/>
for each '<java>' task. It was quite tedious to find all(?) of them.
TODO: In the AspectJ 1.9.7 release notes we need to document that this
parameter is now needed for LTW.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Before Java 16, JDK proxies were given a virtual package name of
'com.sun.proxy'. Now the packages are numbered 'jdk.proxy[n]', i.e.
'jdk.proxy1', 'jdk.proxy2' etc. This makes the package-name-derived path
name here less predictable. In our simple runtime scenario, we can be
pretty sure than the counter starts at 1 because it is the first and
only proxy we create.
TODO: A better solution would be a recursive filtered search via
Files.walk, ideally added as a recursive search option for
CountingFilenameFilter.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Add Java 16 test suite for AspectJ 1.9.7 + test refactorings
- Test all features which were preview in 14+15 and are now final in 16,
compiling them with language level 16.
- For Java 15 we only have sanity tests (and of course the Java <14
tests), compiling Java 16 features to target 15 does not seem to work.
- Test remaining Java 16 preview feature (sealed classes).
- Instead of overriding runTest(String) in several base classes like
XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava*Only or XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava*OrLater,
we now override setUp() from JUnit's TestCase base class. This will
run before runTest(String) and make the tests fail much faster, if a
user tries to run them on the wrong VM.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
It failed with "RuntimeException: I never heard about what kind of build
it was!!" on my (@kriegaex) Windows machine, mostly because in case of a
failing full build the corresponding status is never set.
TODO: Ensure that 'MyStateListener.informedAboutKindOfBuild' is set for
failed builds, too.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Fix tests expecting usage texts as failure outputs
This is a follow-up on commit @31b2d60b. Some tests were actually
expecting usage texts as failure outputs. Because that was fixed, the
tests no longer see those failures, hence they should no longer expect
them.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Alexander Kriegisch
Jonathan Leitschuh
Andy Clement
Andrey Turbanov