Fix annotation style support for if(true) and if(false)
The documentation specifies annotation style pointcuts
can use if(false) or if(true) and not require a boolean
return value and body for the @Pointcut annotated
method but it doesn't work without this change to validation
that recognizes the situation.
Fixes #115
Trailing whitespaces are useless. Most of code-styles forbids them. Most of editors always trim them on save.
I propose to clean up project from trailing whitespaces in all java files at once.
The test worked on my local workstation with German locale, but not on
GitHub with English locale.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Update ECJ version, activate Java 17 preview features tests
After JDT Core (ECJ) was updated to the final Java 17 feature set, the
tests now pass as expected.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
- Fix one fault sanity test configuration
- Deactivate Java 16 preview tests (no longer supported by Java 17
compiler)
- Test sealed classes as final on Java 17 (no longer preview)
- Add tests for JEP 406, pattern matching for switch (preview). At
present, the beta 17 branch of JDT Core does not handle the tested
features and expected compile errors correctly yet, so I had to
temporarily deactivate test execution, only printing TODO messages.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Make all tests run on Java 16 via '-add-opens' JVM option
Due to JEP 260 (Encapsulate Most Internal APIs), aspect weaving on
Java 16 now requires '--add-opens java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED' on
the command line. Otherwise there will be illegal access exceptions for
some internal API calls AspectJ needs, most prominently when trying to
define classes in other packages or modules.
This had to be done on several levels:
- Maven Surefire: running tests in a JVM directly forked by Surefire.
In order to make this backwards compatible, I added two profiles
with JDK-level-dependent auto-activation, one 8-15 and one 16+. In
the latter a property containing the JVM parameter is defined, in
the former it is empty, i.e. the JVM is started without the
parameter. In Java 8 the parameter did not even exist, in Java 9+ we
could use it, but we need to test how users use AspectJ.
- RunSpec: Whenever an XML test is declared to use '<run>', we need to
determine the current JVM version and again dynamically add the
parameter when forking the target JVM.
- AntSpec: Whenever an XML test is declared to use '<ant>', we need to
determine the current JVM version dynamically add two properties
usable from within Ant scripts: 'aj.addOpensKey' and
'aj.addOpensValue'. Unfortunately, Ant needs to use two '<argLine>'
parameters, because the two parts of the option are separated by a
space character.
- Ant scripts: When triggered by an AntSpec, each Ant target using LTW
needs to manually set
<jvmarg value="${aj.addOpensKey}"/>
<jvmarg value="${aj.addOpensValue}"/>
for each '<java>' task. It was quite tedious to find all(?) of them.
TODO: In the AspectJ 1.9.7 release notes we need to document that this
parameter is now needed for LTW.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Before Java 16, JDK proxies were given a virtual package name of
'com.sun.proxy'. Now the packages are numbered 'jdk.proxy[n]', i.e.
'jdk.proxy1', 'jdk.proxy2' etc. This makes the package-name-derived path
name here less predictable. In our simple runtime scenario, we can be
pretty sure than the counter starts at 1 because it is the first and
only proxy we create.
TODO: A better solution would be a recursive filtered search via
Files.walk, ideally added as a recursive search option for
CountingFilenameFilter.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Add Java 16 test suite for AspectJ 1.9.7 + test refactorings
- Test all features which were preview in 14+15 and are now final in 16,
compiling them with language level 16.
- For Java 15 we only have sanity tests (and of course the Java <14
tests), compiling Java 16 features to target 15 does not seem to work.
- Test remaining Java 16 preview feature (sealed classes).
- Instead of overriding runTest(String) in several base classes like
XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava*Only or XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava*OrLater,
we now override setUp() from JUnit's TestCase base class. This will
run before runTest(String) and make the tests fail much faster, if a
user tries to run them on the wrong VM.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
It failed with "RuntimeException: I never heard about what kind of build
it was!!" on my (@kriegaex) Windows machine, mostly because in case of a
failing full build the corresponding status is never set.
TODO: Ensure that 'MyStateListener.informedAboutKindOfBuild' is set for
failed builds, too.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Fix tests expecting usage texts as failure outputs
This is a follow-up on commit @31b2d60b. Some tests were actually
expecting usage texts as failure outputs. Because that was fixed, the
tests no longer see those failures, hence they should no longer expect
them.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Fix test relying on JVM warning being stripped from output
The line in which warnings like "Archived non-system classes are
disabled because the java.system.class.loader property is specified"
appears can start with e.g."OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM" or "Java
HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM". Therefore, an exact match on the former
worked on Linux, but not on Windows, or maybe the difference is
generally between Oracle and OpenJDK. anyway, I use Oracle on Windows
and my build failed. Now it is fixed because I made the match more
generic using a regex.
I also removed a now obsolete check for the occurrence of the stripped
line in test "JDK14 LTW with XML".
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Do not run tests using Java 14 preview features on this Java 15 compiler
These tests need a Java 14 level AspectJ compiler, because they use
version-specific preview features. This compiler has been upgraded
to a Java 15 compliant JDT Core already, i.e. it does not support
preview features of a previous version anymore.
An error message similar to the above explanation will appear when
trying to run any XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava14Only subclass, such as
Ajc196PreviewFeaturesTests (currently the only one).
When running AllTestsAspectJ196, Ajc196PreviewFeaturesTests will not be
added to the test suite anymore.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
- Java 14 feature sample classes moved from 'bugs' to 'features'
- One test case using a Java 14 preview feature was moved to the
Java 14-only tests
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Simplify execution of PureJavaTests and KnownLimitationsTests
Getting rid of XML includes and two superfluous files, merging them with
their respective including counterparts. As far as I can see, the two
test suites are not part of the automatic build process, but can be
started manually as easily as any other test (suite) now.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Fix outdated ajcTestSuite.dtd and lots of XML problems
Now there should be no more inspection warnings when working with XML
test definitions. Only the strangely looking XML files used by
PureJavaTests and KnownLimitationsTests are left to be analysed and
fixed.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Make sure Java 14-only tests using preview are not executed on JVM 15+
Some Ajc196 tests are using preview features (see .../ajc196.xml), i.e.
they will fail on Java 15+ because code compiled with '--enable-preview'
can only run on the same JVM version, not on a more recent one. Hence,
the preview-using tests are now being excluded in order to make the
build run on Java 15, even though no Java 15 features are present in the
current 1.9.7 snapshot.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Add missing '-options' values -1.5, -1.9 to ajc{150,190_from150}.xml
When trying to find out why ajc150.xml and ajc190_from150.xml look
almost identical, I found out that only in many cases the 190 version
has '-option="1.9"' set where in the 150 version it was '-option="1.9"'.
Unfortunately, in both files source/target versions are not set at all
in many places, which looks unintentional. I tried to search & replace
all relevant '<compile ...>' commands for 190 first, then ported back to
150. Only cases in which clearly compiling to an older version like 1.3
or 1.4 is necessary were left like before.
I am expecting missing or false Java target versions in many other of
the legacy XML test suites. For now, I am just committing these two.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Replace path separators ';' by ',' in XML test specs
The goal is for them to be canonicalised to platform standard during
test execution. I am not sure if that will fix any tests, but at least I
hope it will not break any.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Fix path separators in ajc190.xml, make tests run on Windows
Replace ':' by ";" which will be replaced to the platform
separator automatically. A fixed value of ':' does not work on Windows.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Reports on declarations of Collection variables made by using the collection class as the type, rather than an appropriate interface.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports Collection.addAll() and Map.putAll() calls after instantiation of a collection using a constructor call without arguments. Such constructs can be replaced with a single call to a parametrized constructor which simplifies code. Also for some collections the replacement might be more performant.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Collections.sort() can be replaced with List.sort()
Reports calls to Collections.sort(list, comparator) which could be replaced with list.sort(comparator).
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports "unboxing", e.g. explicit unwrapping of wrapped primitive values. Unboxing is unnecessary under Java 5 and newer, and can be safely removed.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports explicit boxing, i.e. wrapping of primitive values in objects. Explicit manual boxing is unnecessary under Java 5 and newer, and can be safely removed.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
'String.indexOf()' expression is replaceable with 'contains()'
Reports any String.indexOf() expressions which can be replaced with a call to the String.contains() method available in Java 5 and newer.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports for loops which iterate over collections or arrays, and can be replaced with an enhanced for loop (i.e. the foreach iteration syntax).
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Andy Clement
Alexander Kriegisch
Andrey Turbanov
Lars Grefer