It makes sense to indicate the Java version in the minor-minor of
AspectJ artifacts.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

This was required by the Eclipse team as one precondition for the next
release.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

This is a bugfix release, reverting the essential parts of commit
f70aeb5e, because it causes AspectJ Maven integration tests using
javadoc to fail on JDK 8.

See commit discussion on
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/commit/f70aeb5e#commitcomment-51417353

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

Also depend on JDT Core 1.9.7.M2

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

Before, we used 1.9.7.BUILD-SNAPSHOT, which according to Andy Clement
was originally an intent across a group of Spring projects he was
involved in, to ensure that SNAPSHOTS were sorted alphabetically ahead
of MILESTONEs and ahead of RCs.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

If 'name' is identical to 'artifactId' and 'packaging' has the default
value 'jar', we can just remove those tags from the POM.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

Several LTW tests using class TestServer failed on my machine because
there was a hard-coded project base directory name 'org.aspectj' in the
class. This class has several other problems, but my quick fix for now -
I did not want to rename my project base directory - was to match on a
regex '(?i)(org[.])?aspectj' now. That also works for my root directory
'AspectJ'.

I also moved the code determining the project dir into a protected
(hence testable) method and added a sanity test case checking if the
directory can be determined. If not, the test will fail with a rather
lengthy warning to developers about the need to have a matching project
root folder.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

Reports on declarations of Collection variables made by using the collection class as the type, rather than an appropriate interface.

Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>

Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>

Reports any String.indexOf() expressions which can be replaced with a call to the String.contains() method available in Java 5 and newer.

Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>

Reports for loops which iterate over collections or arrays, and can be replaced with an enhanced for loop (i.e. the foreach iteration syntax).

Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>

Some alternate behaviour added to work better on Java9