Before, we used 1.9.7.BUILD-SNAPSHOT, which according to Andy Clement
was originally an intent across a group of Spring projects he was
involved in, to ensure that SNAPSHOTS were sorted alphabetically ahead
of MILESTONEs and ahead of RCs.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
This involves replacing references in weaver application code as well as
a few tests.
In order to make AspectJ weaver + tools contain a relocated ASM version,
I added a Maven Shade relocation step after Maven Assembly created the
uber JARs. Relocation works for both binaries and sources and also
encompasses Class::forName calls like in class AsmDetector.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Remove redundant 'name' and 'packaging' tags from POMs
If 'name' is identical to 'artifactId' and 'packaging' has the default
value 'jar', we can just remove those tags from the POM.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Clean up Maven dependencies using 'dependency:analyze' goal
Notably, this change involves a partial revert of @4a5660b3, because we
are not using JUnit Jupiter yet but still JUnit 4 tests. See discussion
under commit at https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/commit/4a5660b3.
Many other warnings - concerning both used undeclared and unused
declared dependencies - were eliminated by adding or removing the
corresponding dependencies from the POMs. Furthermore, I tried to make
sure that some clearly test-scoped dependencies are now actually
declared as such, so as to avoid unwanted transitivity bleeding into
compile scope and maybe unwanted classes ending up in uber JARs via
Maven Shade or Maven Assembly.
TODO: I am not so sure why modules other than 'run-all-unit-tests' would
depend on test JARs. I hope I broke nothing essential there. As of
today, the other modules where I found '<type>test-jar</type>'
dependencies are:
- ajde
- testing
- testing-drivers
- tests
- weaver
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
In two places, the documentation now contains this text:
"Since AspectJ 1.9.7, the obsolete Oracle/BEA JRockit agent is no longer
part of AspectJ. JRockit JDK never supported Java versions higher than
1.6. Several JRockit JVM features are now part of HotSpot and tools like
Mission Control available for OpenJDK and Oracle JDK."
The decision to drop JRockit support was made during a discussion
between Alexander Kriegisch and Andy Clement:
Andy Clement wrote on 26 Mar 2021:
> Yes I think so.
>
>
> Alexander Kriegisch wrote on 26 Mar 2021:
>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JRockit
>>
>> Can we get rid of that? AspectJ requires Java 8, JRockit never
>> supported more than Java 6.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
It was the only subdirectory under lib/ext anyway and somehow always
irritating and difficult to find when just using a directory browser in
the IDE.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
There are two styles to convert a collection to an array: either using a pre-sized array (like c.toArray(new String[c.size()])) or using an empty array (like c.toArray(new String[0]).
In older Java versions using pre-sized array was recommended, as the reflection call which is necessary to create an array of proper size was quite slow. However since late updates of OpenJDK 6 this call was intrinsified, making the performance of the empty array version the same and sometimes even better, compared to the pre-sized version. Also passing pre-sized array is dangerous for a concurrent or synchronized collection as a data race is possible between the size and toArray call which may result in extra nulls at the end of the array, if the collection was concurrently shrunk during the operation.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
'String.indexOf()' expression is replaceable with 'contains()'
Reports any String.indexOf() expressions which can be replaced with a call to the String.contains() method available in Java 5 and newer.
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
Reports for loops which iterate over collections or arrays, and can be replaced with an enhanced for loop (i.e. the foreach iteration syntax).
Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
On JDK11 call the defineClass variant with a ProtectionDomain param
This alters the defineClass used when loadtime weaving and defining
'extra' classes (e.g. closures). This change causes us to call
the defineClass() method variant on ClassLoader that takes a
protection domain, so it should share the same protection domain as
the class for which the extra class was generated.
Issue: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=542421
Alexander Kriegisch
Jerry James
Andy Clement
Lars Grefer