The tests from Java 21 were copied to 22. Inactive ones were activated
after their features under test were fixed/implemented. Preview ones
were promotes to final ones for unnamed variables and patterns.
TODO: Add tests for new Java 22 features and maybe adjust or
amend existing feature tests, if preview or final characteristics have
changed since Java 21.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Both bcel.jar and bcel-verifier.jar seem to be obsolete.
Possible next step: Remove bcel-builder/verifier-src.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Throw exception for minimal AJC runtime version violation
When running AJC, throw an AbortException(MINIMAL_JRE_VERSION) instead
of just logging an error, if the minimal JRE version requirement is
violated. Otherwise, in-process compilation would not fail due to the
skipped System.exit(-1) that was used before. In-process compilation is,
for example, relevant for AspectJ Maven Plugin, but also for non-forked
executions of Plexus AspectJ via Maven Compiler.
I am not 100% sure that AbortException is the appropriate exception
type, because it was designed for an aborted compilation process and
here compilation has not even started yet, but it seems to work fine.
Relates to #269.
Fixes #292.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
- Recognise more "fork-worthy" JVM parameters
- Pass on program arguments to program in forked JVM
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
- Add short description to AJC usage message via
messages_aspectj.properties
- Add longer description to ajc.adoc in the AspectJ Development
Environment Guide
Closes https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=455014.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
LangUtil: remove methods like 'is11VMOrGreater', 'is1dot5VMOrGreater'
Replace them by a uniform method 'isVMGreaterOrEqual(double)', also
overloaded for int.
This gets rid of one 'AspectJ_JDK_Update' tag. One less place to check
and update with each newly supported Java version. :-)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
The hint is meant to help AspectJ developers identify the places where
there are to-dos for releases supporting new Java versions. This is work
in progress, new tags can be added wherever necessary in the future. But
for now, the most important places should be covered:
- AJC version string
- Test infrastructure (test suites, classes and XML files)
- BCEL class file version MAJOR_*, MINOR_* constants
- AjcTask constants for compiler source, target, release
- LangUtil::is*VMOrGreater methods
- ASM and JDT Core dependency versions
- CI workflow file
- Release notes
The to-do to check the tagged places is also mentioned in RELEASE.md.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
AjCompilerOptions: Increment irritant levels to GROUP4
Needs eclipse-aspectj/eclipse.jdt.core#ed6050bb.
See also eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core#2006.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Overhaul ClassLoaderWeavingAdaptor to use statically initialised Unsafe
instances and method handles pointing to their 'defineClass' methods.
Those now work universally on JDKs 8-21. In older JDKs, the method used
to be in sun.misc.Unsafe, in more recent ones on jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.
It is challenging to fetch instances, especially as reflection
protection and module boundaries have been increased in the JDK
progressively. But finally, a solution was adapted from Byte Buddy (BB).
Kudos to BB author Rafael Winterhalter. The previous solution to use
ClassLoader::defineClass and require '--add-opens' is no longer
necessary for the first time since it became necessary in AspectJ 1.9.7
with Java 16 support.
Add org.ow2.asm:asm-common as a dependency everywhere org.ow2.asm:asm
was used before. Maybe that is too many places, but no worse than before.
Add missing dependency on loadtime to aspectjweaver. This kept a build
like "mvn install -am -pl aspectjweaver" from picking up changed
loadtime classes.
Fixes #117.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
- AspectJ Browser (ajbrowser)
- Forte IDE integration
- JBuilder IDE integration
- Emacs integration
All this information was old and outdated. Ajbrowser was removed from
AspectJ a while ago. If the other tools even still exist, any possibly
existing AspectJ support is not part of AspectJ itself.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Use new constant Main.MINIMAL_JRE_VERSION (currently = 17) and
SourceVersion.latest().ordinal() to check, if the minimal JRE version
requirement for AJC is met. If not, then exit with code -1 and error
message "The AspectJ compiler needs at least Java runtime 17".
Relates to #269.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Currently, the situation looks more like a Java 21 maintenance release
than directly a Java 22 release.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
AjcTestCase: Make sure main methods can be called in Java 21
Since JDK 21, a public main method of a non-public (e.g. default-scoped)
class can no longer be invoked without making it accessible first.
Because many test sources contain multiple aspects and classes in one
file, this is a frequent use case.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
While trying to understand the code a bit better in order to fix failing
builds, I applied some cosmetic refactoring and reformatting. This
commit does not change any functionality.
Whether the static import of CompilationAndWeavingContext.* is a good
thing or not is debatable, but I like the code to be less chatty than it
was before, assuming that every developer uses an IDE helping to find
out where static methods and constants come from.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
messages_aspectj.properties:
compiler.version = ... d23a141971 (27Apr2023) - Java20
Too bad this version string did not make it into 1.9.20 and 1.9.20.1.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
This enables compiled source code to use ASM. This way, it is possible
to bootstrap tests needing specially prepared class files by
1. compiling an ASM-enabled byte code generator class,
2. running the generator, writing out class files,
3. using the generated class files in subsequent tests.
Until now, such classes always had to be checked into the ASM directly
or inside JARs. Now, this is no longer necessary.
The next commit will be the first example.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Further improve indentation of compilation results on the console
In CompilationResult.toString, no longer indent like this:
[warning 1] warning at
after() : execution(FooBar Blah.*()) {
^^^^^^
xxx FooBar [Xlint:invalidAbsoluteTypeName]
Instead, always just indent by 2 spaces, saving screen real estate:
[warning 1] warning at
after() : execution(FooBar Blah.*()) {
^^^^^^
xxx FooBar [Xlint:invalidAbsoluteTypeName]
Also further streamline/simplify the code a bit.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Fix indentation of compilation results on the console
Whenever warnings or errors were printed via CompilationResult.toString,
indirectly also using MessageUtil.renderMessage(IMessage, boolean),
messages containing context info such as code snippets with carets
marking erroneous tokens - see also the previous commit - prefixes like
"[warning 1] warning at " were printed right in front of the code
snippets. I.e., the carets marking erroneous tokens in the second line
were not indented like the first line with the code snippet, leading to
(simplified) output like:
[warning 1] warning at after() : execution(FooBar Blah.*()) {
^^^^^^
xxx FooBar [Xlint:invalidAbsoluteTypeName]
This was fixed to now correctly indent lines 2 to n according to line 1,
yielding the correct output:
[warning 1] warning at
after() : execution(FooBar Blah.*()) {
^^^^^^
xxx FooBar [Xlint:invalidAbsoluteTypeName]
Especially with longer, more complex context lines, this helps to
identify the erroneous section. BTW, for one-line messages, everything
of course looks like before.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Bugfix: caret error marks in compiler output too short
This very old bug in EclipseAdapterUtils calculated the '^' caret error
marks incorrectly. The marks were too short like this:
void m() { return vax[3]; }
^^^^^^^^^^^
Where the correct result would look like this:
void m() { return vax[3]; }
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This was due to the rather complicated way in which first surrounding
context code - here the leading 'void m() { ' and trailing ' }' - was
first added and then possible leading white space was cut off again from
the left. It is difficult to explain, the code is a nightmare, trying to
work with char arrays, counting indexes, repeatedly using
System.arraycopy and using lots of counters and offsets. I would have
liked to simplify the code, converting char[] buffers to Strings, but
decided to keep the basic structure for now, not sure what kind of
memory or performance considerations led to this design.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Alexander Kriegisch