At present, no tests are failing without those resources, but for good
measure, I added them anyway, because then the same path could in the
future also be used for stand-alone compilation tests which are not
triggered in-process via AJDT interface but, not unlike "full LTW"
test execution mode, in a separate JVM.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Make sure that program arguments are passed through in full LTW mode
This fixes e.g. LTWTests.testDeclareAbstractAspect, which passes on
names of ITD methods to the test program, which in turn executes those
methods via reflection.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
In 'useFullLTW' mode, aspectjweaver.jar is a Java agent. Therefore, what
is contained in there does not need to be on the classpath.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
It was referring to a no longer existent weaver under
aj-build/dist/tools/lib/aspectjweaver.jar, which now has been replaced
by the new file lib/aspectj/lib/aspectjweaver.jar.
Several tests were broken, not finding the agent. But because those
tests make no assertions, nobody ever noticed. Only when I had to change
some LTW tests from in-process to full LTW mode (see next commit) due to
them now obviously calling some code paths which need '--add-opens', I
even noticed the problem.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Fix annotation style support for if(true) and if(false)
The documentation specifies annotation style pointcuts
can use if(false) or if(true) and not require a boolean
return value and body for the @Pointcut annotated
method but it doesn't work without this change to validation
that recognizes the situation.
Fixes #115
Methods Integer.parseInt/Boolean.parseBoolean should be preferred over Integer.valueOf/Boolean.valueOf/ if final result is primitive.
They are generally faster and generate less garbage.
Rename DOM AST class TypePattern to AbstractTypePattern
Since JDT Core 3.27 (Java 17), there is a name clash, because the new
class org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.TypePattern (JEP 406) gets relocated to
org.aspectj.org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.TypePattern during shading.
Fortunately, this made tests like AjASTTest and AjAST5Test fail with
rather nasty errors like:
java.lang.VerifyError: Bad return type (...)
Type 'org/aspectj/org/eclipse/jdt/core/dom/TypePattern' (...) is not
assignable to 'org/aspectj/org/eclipse/jdt/core/dom/Pattern' (...)
TODO: Update AJDT references to the renamed class in the following
classes after refreshing the AspectJ sources:
- ExtraPackageReferenceFinder
- ExtraTypeReferenceFinder
This also means, that for Eclipse 2021-09 (4.21) we need a new AJDT
update site, because simply deploying to the 4.19 one would probably
lead to problems in the IDE.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Update ECJ version, activate Java 17 preview features tests
After JDT Core (ECJ) was updated to the final Java 17 feature set, the
tests now pass as expected.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
In ITD processing, use setter instead of assigning Scope directly
Change calls like
pre.scope.parent = newParent;
to this pattern:
// Use setter in order to also update member 'compilationUnitScope'
pre.scope.setParent(newParent);
This should fix lots of failing tests after updating JDT Core.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
This is a bugfix release, reverting the essential parts of commit
f70aeb5e, because it causes AspectJ Maven integration tests using
javadoc to fail on JDK 8.
See commit discussion on
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/commit/f70aeb5e#commitcomment-51417353
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Before, we used 1.9.7.BUILD-SNAPSHOT, which according to Andy Clement
was originally an intent across a group of Spring projects he was
involved in, to ensure that SNAPSHOTS were sorted alphabetically ahead
of MILESTONEs and ahead of RCs.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
This involves replacing references in weaver application code as well as
a few tests.
In order to make AspectJ weaver + tools contain a relocated ASM version,
I added a Maven Shade relocation step after Maven Assembly created the
uber JARs. Relocation works for both binaries and sources and also
encompasses Class::forName calls like in class AsmDetector.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Upon special request by Andy Clement, I included 'lib' as a child module
in the parent POM again, making several modules which refer to
downloaded library files dependent the 'lib' module. I am not sure I
caught all of them, but I hope so.
Now after cloning the project and configuring the token for reading from
GitHub Packages (sorry!), you can just run a Maven build for the main
project and no longer need to fail the first build, read the Maven
Enforcer message and run 'cd lib && mvn compile' as a first step. This
convenience comes at the price of a more complex POM and two new
profiles:
- Profile 'provision-libs' is auto-activated by the absence of a
marker file, kicking off the library provisioning process and
creating same marker file at the end, if successful. Therefore,
during subsequent builds libraries will not be re-provisioned,
because the marker file exists and Maven skips all download and
(un)zip steps, which saves build time and bandwidth. Otherwise
offline builds would not work either.
- Profile 'clean-libs' needs to be activated manually, because by
default 'mvn clean' will not erase provisioned libraries. In most
cases, even after a clean a developer does not want to re-provision
all libraries if they have not changed (e.g. new JDT Core build).
But if you do wish too erase the libraries and the marker file, just
call 'cd lib && mvn -P clean-libs clean'.
Please note: The Maven Enforcer build step, which additionally checks
for existence of other files, still exists and was moved from the parent
POM to 'libs'. No matter if provisioning was just done or skipped
because the main marker file exists, a quick heuristic check for that
list of files is done during each build, failing the build with a
comprehensive message if an inconsistency was found. The error message
says which files are missing and tells the user:
"There is an inconsistency in module subdirectory 'lib'. Please run
'mvn --projects lib -P clean-libs clean compile'. This should take
care of cleaning and freshly downloading all necessary libraries to
that directory, where some tests expect them to be."
This should cover the topic.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
The new string AjcTestCase.CLASSPATH_ASM_RENAMED dynamically determines
the 'asm-renamed' location from the classpath, system property
'java.class.path'.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Remove redundant 'name' and 'packaging' tags from POMs
If 'name' is identical to 'artifactId' and 'packaging' has the default
value 'jar', we can just remove those tags from the POM.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Remove remaining usage message duplication between ECJ and AJC
The resource key 'misc.usage' is completely gone from
.../jdt/internal/compiler/batch/messages_aspectj.properties. Instead,
JDT Core was adjusted in such a way as to patch the new resource key
'misc.usage.aspectj' into the upstream 'misc.usage' in the right place.
Now finally the properties file is as lean as I envisioned it to be,
without any loss of information and without the need of future manual
synchronisation of duplicate texts for every release.
At the same time, usage text detection in AjdtCommand::inferKind was
improved and also adjusted to the new situation.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Clean up Maven dependencies using 'dependency:analyze' goal
Notably, this change involves a partial revert of @4a5660b3, because we
are not using JUnit Jupiter yet but still JUnit 4 tests. See discussion
under commit at https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/commit/4a5660b3.
Many other warnings - concerning both used undeclared and unused
declared dependencies - were eliminated by adding or removing the
corresponding dependencies from the POMs. Furthermore, I tried to make
sure that some clearly test-scoped dependencies are now actually
declared as such, so as to avoid unwanted transitivity bleeding into
compile scope and maybe unwanted classes ending up in uber JARs via
Maven Shade or Maven Assembly.
TODO: I am not so sure why modules other than 'run-all-unit-tests' would
depend on test JARs. I hope I broke nothing essential there. As of
today, the other modules where I found '<type>test-jar</type>'
dependencies are:
- ajde
- testing
- testing-drivers
- tests
- weaver
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Alexander Kriegisch
Andrey Turbanov
Andy Clement