123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102 |
-
- <!DOCTYPE suite SYSTEM "../tests/ajcTestSuite.dtd">
-
- <suite>
- <!--
- In order for these tests to pass you have to flip this flag to true:
- AsmManager.attemptIncrementalModelRepairs
-
- If you want to debug the output from the tests, you might want uncomment
- the static initializer in AsmManager which will enable you to collect
- detailed information on model processing.
- -->
-
- <!--
- These tests utilise the inc-compile test harness option but I've extended it
- with a checkModel option which enables me to check information about the model
- after a incremental compilation step.
- -->
-
- <!--
- asm relationships for inter type declarations are tricky things.
- Today, because type mungers don't remember where they came from in attribute form,
- the relationships for ITDs are created during source compilation. When building incrementally,
- we are really doing a binary weave of 'everything else' with the source for the file that
- has changed. In this case the relationships for ITDs are not added. This makes managing
- them incrementally in the model rather tough!
-
- The solution is to make them remember where they came from. This would mean we can create
- the relationships during weave time and so they will be created when either doing a
- source compilation or a binary weave. The support is in ResolvedTypeMunger to remember
- where they came from (you just have to flick a switch) but I haven't switched it on
- because we need to version *all* aspectj attributes properly so that we don't end up with
- a migration nightmare. If ITD attributes remembered their location in a particular version
- of AspectJ then everyone would need to recompile their code from source with that version.
- If we keep changing the attributes, we keep having this problem. If we include a *version*
- number in every attribute we can make the compiler more robust to coping with 'old' attributes
- that might be missing certain options or values.
-
- Hence the first test here is not complete...
-
- -->
- <ajc-test dir="incremental/model/introduction"
- title="Testing incremental structure model: Intertype declarations (and a declare parents)"
- keywords="incremental-test,model-test" >
- <compile staging="true" options="-incremental,-emacssym" sourceroots="."/>
- <inc-compile tag="20"/> <!-- Just 'touched' one file -->
- <inc-compile tag="30"/> <!-- Just 'touched another aspect -->
- </ajc-test>
-
- <ajc-test dir="incremental/model/intertype"
- title="Testing incremental structure model: Intertype field declarations"
- keywords="incremental-test,model-test" >
- <compile staging="true" options="-incremental,-emacssym" sourceroots="."/>
- <inc-compile tag="20" checkModel="inter-type field=2,RelationshipMapSize=3"/> <!-- BetaA intertypes int i and String s -->
- <inc-compile tag="30" checkModel="inter-type field=1,RelationshipMapSize=2"/> <!-- BetaA takes the String intertype away -->
- </ajc-test>
-
- <ajc-test dir="incremental/model/weaving2"
- title="Testing incremental structure model: Weaving handlers"
- keywords="incremental-test,model-test" >
- <compile staging="true" options="-incremental,-emacssym" sourceroots="."/>
- <inc-compile tag="20" checkModel="code=1,advice=1,RelationshipMapSize=2"/> <!-- BetaA has a new piece of handler advice added -->
- <inc-compile tag="30" checkModel="code=1,advice=2,RelationshipMapSize=3"/> <!-- secondary.GammaA added, also advises the same handler -->
- <inc-compile tag="40" checkModel="code=1,advice=1,RelationshipMapSize=2"/> <!-- primary.BetaA deleted -->
- </ajc-test>
-
- <ajc-test dir="incremental/model/weaving"
- title="Testing incremental structure model: Weaving"
- keywords="incremental-test,model-test" >
- <compile staging="true" options="-incremental,-emacssym" sourceroots="."/>
- <inc-compile tag="20" checkModel="code=2,advice=2,java source file=3,RelationshipMapSize=4"/> <!-- BetaA has a new piece of advice added -->
- <inc-compile tag="30" checkModel="code=1,advice=1,RelationshipMapSize=2"/> <!-- BetaA has a piece of advice removed -->
- <inc-compile tag="40" checkModel="code=0,RelationshipMapSize=0,advice=0"/> <!-- BetaA other piece of advice removed (now empty) -->
- </ajc-test>
-
-
- <ajc-test dir="incremental/model/sourcefiles_updating"
- title="Testing incremental structure model: Updating files"
- keywords="incremental-test,model-test" >
- <compile staging="true" options="-incremental,-emacssym" sourceroots="."/>
- <!-- On first compile, 5 source files in model, 'root','Alpha','Beta','Gamma','Delta' -->
- <inc-compile tag="20" checkModel="java source file=5,method=4,class=3,FileMapSize=4"/> <!-- Beta changed, method added -->
- <inc-compile tag="30" checkModel="java source file=5,method=4,class=4,advice=1"/> <!-- Delta changed, class added -->
- <inc-compile tag="40" checkModel="advice=2"/> <!-- Gamma changed, advice added -->
- <inc-compile tag="50" checkModel="advice=2,pointcut=1"/> <!-- Gamma changed, pointcut added -->
- <inc-compile tag="60" checkModel="advice=0,pointcut=1"/> <!-- Gamma changed, both advice removed -->
- </ajc-test>
-
- <ajc-test dir="incremental/model/sourcefiles_addremove"
- title="Testing incremental structure model: Adding and removing files"
- keywords="incremental-test,model-test" >
- <compile staging="true" options="-incremental,-emacssym" sourceroots="."/>
- <!-- On first compile, two source files in model, 'root' and 'Alpha' -->
- <inc-compile tag="20" checkModel="java source file=3,FileMapSize=2"/> <!-- Adds primary.Beta class -->
- <inc-compile tag="30" checkModel="java source file=4"/> <!-- Adds secondary.Gamma aspect -->
- <inc-compile tag="40" checkModel="java source file=5,package=2,FileMapSize=4"/> <!-- Adds seconday.Delta class -->
- <inc-compile tag="50" checkModel="java source file=4,package=2"/> <!-- Deletes Gamma aspect -->
- <inc-compile tag="60" checkModel="java source file=2,FileMapSize=1"/> <!-- Deletes Beta and Delta classes -->
- </ajc-test>
-
-
- </suite>
|