Browse Source

As we store re_class within re avoid extra lookup

tags/1.1.0
Vsevolod Stakhov 8 years ago
parent
commit
1a7a90ffb7
1 changed files with 2 additions and 3 deletions
  1. 2
    3
      src/libserver/re_cache.c

+ 2
- 3
src/libserver/re_cache.c View File

gboolean is_strong, gboolean is_strong,
gboolean is_multiple) gboolean is_multiple)
{ {
guint64 class_id, re_id;
guint64 re_id;
struct rspamd_re_class *re_class; struct rspamd_re_class *re_class;
struct rspamd_re_cache *cache; struct rspamd_re_cache *cache;


} }
else { else {
/* Slow path */ /* Slow path */
class_id = rspamd_re_cache_class_id (type, type_data, datalen);
re_class = g_hash_table_lookup (cache->re_classes, &class_id);
re_class = rspamd_regexp_get_class (re);


if (re_class == NULL) { if (re_class == NULL) {
msg_err_task ("cannot find re class for regexp '%s'", msg_err_task ("cannot find re class for regexp '%s'",

Loading…
Cancel
Save