| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Bjoern Schiessle <bjoern@schiessle.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Bjoern Schiessle <bjoern@schiessle.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Bjoern Schiessle <bjoern@schiessle.org>
|
|\
| |
| | |
validate file name before uploading in upload only folder
|
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Artur Neumann <info@individual-it.net>
|
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Artur Neumann <info@individual-it.net>
|
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Artur Neumann <info@individual-it.net>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
fixes #4211
Signed-off-by: Artur Neumann <info@individual-it.net>
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
* fixes #4383
* improves consistency
Signed-off-by: Morris Jobke <hey@morrisjobke.de>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
* fix mess with menus and actions in the files app
* reduces amount of !important usages
* keeps the behaviour on mobile as well as on desktop
Signed-off-by: Morris Jobke <hey@morrisjobke.de>
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
Remove unused CSS
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Signed-off-by: Morris Jobke <hey@morrisjobke.de>
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
Add "Reply-To" on ShareByMailProvider mails
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Lukas Reschke <lukas@statuscode.ch>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Fixes https://github.com/nextcloud/server/issues/4209
Signed-off-by: Lukas Reschke <lukas@statuscode.ch>
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
nextcloud/adjust-old-bruteforce-protection-annotations
Adjust existing bruteforce protection code
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
- Moves code to annotation
- Adds the `throttle()` call on the responses on existing annotations
Signed-off-by: Lukas Reschke <lukas@statuscode.ch>
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ /
|/| | | | |
Fix translations
|
| | |/ /
| |/| |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Joas Schilling <coding@schilljs.com>
|
|/ / / |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
Access list to share manager
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Joas Schilling <coding@schilljs.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Joas Schilling <coding@schilljs.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Joas Schilling <coding@schilljs.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Joas Schilling <coding@schilljs.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Joas Schilling <coding@schilljs.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Joas Schilling <coding@schilljs.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
* Each provider just returns what they have so adding an element won't
require changing everything
* Added tests
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
* This allows for effective queries.
* Introduce currentAccess parameter to speciy if the users needs to have
currently acces (deleted incomming group share). (For notifications)
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
|
| |/ /
|/| | |
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
Fix AdBlock blocking share icon, ref #866
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Jan-Christoph Borchardt <hey@jancborchardt.net>
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Explain local link
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
The local link is a clever thing and the clients should support this imho but it might not be clear to all users. For one, the term 'local link' is a bit odd. Local with respect to what? It links directly to the file or folder, so direct link seems to make more sense to me. And we should explain the difference with a public link. So this PR:
* renames local link to direct link
* adds a short explanation, noting it only works for users who have access to this file/folder.
As other links are called public link you could also consider calling this 'private link', I suppose. But the links we sent by mail to ppl could also be called 'private link' (they are for one user, who git it by email) so I think it might be confusing. What do @nextcloud/designers think?
Signed-off-by: Morris Jobke <hey@morrisjobke.de>
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Add support for ratelimiting via annotations
|
| | |_|/ /
| |/| | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
This allows adding rate limiting via annotations to controllers, as one example:
```
@UserRateThrottle(limit=5, period=100)
@AnonRateThrottle(limit=1, period=100)
```
Would mean that logged-in users can access the page 5 times within 100 seconds, and anonymous users 1 time within 100 seconds. If only an AnonRateThrottle is specified that one will also be applied to logged-in users.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Reschke <lukas@statuscode.ch>
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / /
|/| | | | |
Change LDAP method names
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Morris Jobke <hey@morrisjobke.de>
|
| |/ / /
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Said file doesn't exist anymore and accessing it would just return a 500
Signed-off-by: Lukas Reschke <lukas@statuscode.ch>
|
| | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
New emails for sharebymail
|