FOP supports multiple output formats by using a different renderer for each format. The renderers do not all have the same set of capabilities, sometimes because of the output format itself, sometimes because some renderers get more development attention than others.
Most FOP renderers use a FOP-specific system for font registration. However, the AWT and print renderers use the java awt package, which gets its font information from the operating system registration. This can result in several differences, including actually using different fonts, and having different font metrics for the same font. The net effect is that the layout of a given FO document can be quite different between renderers that do not use the same font information.
The most obvious way to print your document is to use the FOP print renderer, which uses the Java API (AWT). However, you can also send output from the Postscript renderer directly to a Postscript device, or output from the PCL renderer directly to a PCL device.
Here are Windows command-line examples for Postscript and PCL:
Here is some Java code to accomplish the task in UNIX:
Set the OutputStream (out) to the PCLRenderer and it happily sends the PCL to the UNIX printer queue.
PDF is the best supported output format. It is also the most accurate with text and layout. This creates a PDF document that is streamed out as each page is rendered. This means that the internal page index information is stored near the end of the document. The PDF version supported is 1.3 which is currently the most popular version for Acrobat Reader (4.0), PDF versions are forwards/backwards compatible.
Note that FOP does not currently support "tagged pdf".
PDF has a set of fonts that are always available to all PDF viewers, to quote from the PDF Specification: "PDF prescribes a set of 14 standard fonts that can be used without prior definition. These include four faces each of three Latin text typefaces (Courier, Helvetica, and Times), as well as two symbolic fonts (Symbol and ITC Zapf Dingbats). These fonts, or suitable substitute fonts with the same metrics, are guaranteed to be available in all PDF viewer applications."
FOP does not currently support several desirable PDF features: document properties (title, author, etc.), and watermarks. One workaround is to use Adobe Acrobat (the full version, not the Reader) to process the file manually or with scripting that it supports.
Another popular post-processing tool is iText, which has tools for adding security features, document properties, watermarks, and many other features to PDF files.
Here is some sample code that uses iText to encrypt a FOP-generated PDF. (Note that FOP now supports PDF encryption. However the principles for using iText for other PDF features are similar.)
Check the iText tutorial and documentation for setting access flags, password, encryption strength and other parameters.
In addition to the PDF Post-processing options, consider the following workarounds:
This format is for the Hewlett-Packard PCL printers. It should produce output as close to identical as possible to the printed output of the PDFRenderer within the limitations of the renderer, and output device.
The output created by the PCLRenderer is generic PCL 5 as documented in the "HP PCL 5 Printer Language Technical Reference Manual" (copyright 1990). This should allow any device fully supporting PCL 5 to be able to print the output generated by the PCLRenderer.
There are some special features that are controlled by some public variables on the PCLRenderer class.
The PostScript renderer is still in its early stages and therefore still missing some features. It provides good support for most text and layout. Images and SVG are not fully supported, yet. Currently, the PostScript renderer generates PostScript Level 3 with most DSC comments. Actually, the only Level 3 feature used is FlateDecode, everthing else is Level 2.
This is currently not integrated with FOP but it will soon. This will create an rtf (rich text format) document that will attempt to contain as much information from the fo document as possible.
This format creates an SVG document that has links between the pages. This is primarily for slides and creating svg images of pages. Large documents will create SVG files that are far too large for and SVG viewer to handle. Since fo documents usually have text the SVG document will have a large number of text elements. The font information for the text is obtained from the jvm in the same way as the AWT viewer, if the svg is view where the fonts are different, such as another platform, then the page will appear wrong.
This is for testing and verification. The XML created is simply a representation of the internal area tree put into XML. It does not perform any other purpose.
It is possible to directly print the document from the command line. This is done with the same code that renders to the AWT renderer.
The AWT viewer shows a window with the pages displayed inside a java graphic. It displays one page at a time. The fonts used for the formatting and viewing depend on the fonts available to your JRE.
This format is the Maker Interchange Format which is used by Adobe Framemaker. This is currently not fully implemented.
The text renderer produces plain ASCII text output that attempts to match the output of the PDFRenderer as closely as possible. This was originally developed to accommodate an archive system that could only accept plain text files, and is primarily useful for getting a quick-and-dirty view of the document text. The renderer is very limited, so do not be surprised if it gives unsatisfactory results.
The Text renderer works with a fixed size page buffer. The size of this buffer is controlled with the textCPI and textLPI public variables. The textCPI is the effective horizontal characters per inch to use. The textLPI is the vertical lines per inch to use. From these values and the page width and height the size of the buffer is calculated. The formatting objects to be rendered are then mapped to this grid. Graphic elements (lines, borders, etc) are assigned a lower priority than text, so text will overwrite any graphic element representations.
Because FOP lays the text onto a grid during layout, there are frequently extra or missing spaces between characters and lines, which is generally unsatisfactory. Users have reported that the optimal settings to avoid such spacing problems are: