From: aclement Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:02:45 +0000 (+0000) Subject: 266420: rogue unused private warning X-Git-Tag: pre268419~63 X-Git-Url: https://source.dussan.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=34467bbdc9d08ede26bf33ab27c736b2bc05f962;p=aspectj.git 266420: rogue unused private warning --- diff --git a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/Ajc164Tests.java b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/Ajc164Tests.java index 74175ea6a..d2971ab9e 100644 --- a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/Ajc164Tests.java +++ b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/Ajc164Tests.java @@ -34,13 +34,23 @@ import org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase; public class Ajc164Tests extends org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase { + public void testUnusedPrivateWarning_pr266420() { + runTest("unused private warning"); + } + + public void testUnusedPrivateWarning_pr266420_2() { + runTest("unused private warning - 2"); + } + + public void testUnusedPrivateWarning_pr266420_3() { + runTest("unused private warning - 3"); + } + /** - * This test program can be used to compare handles for faulted in binary - * aspects with handles that would be used if the aspect was available as - * source. There are two compile steps in the xml for the test - commenting - * out the first will allow the source handles to be seen, leaving it in - * will switch to binary. Effectively the only difference should be that in - * the binary case the handles are prefixed 'binaries'. + * This test program can be used to compare handles for faulted in binary aspects with handles that would be used if the aspect + * was available as source. There are two compile steps in the xml for the test - commenting out the first will allow the source + * handles to be seen, leaving it in will switch to binary. Effectively the only difference should be that in the binary case + * the handles are prefixed 'binaries'. */ public void testItdsAspectPathModel_pr265729_1() { runTest("aspectpath model"); @@ -242,11 +252,9 @@ public class Ajc164Tests extends org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase { } /** - * This test checks that local variable table for the interMethodDispatcher - * is built correctly, for the related code see - * IntertypeMethodDeclaration.generateDispatchMethod(). It checks non-static - * and static ITDs. Once the information here is correct then around advice - * on ITDs can also be correct. + * This test checks that local variable table for the interMethodDispatcher is built correctly, for the related code see + * IntertypeMethodDeclaration.generateDispatchMethod(). It checks non-static and static ITDs. Once the information here is + * correct then around advice on ITDs can also be correct. */ public void testBrokenLVT_pr194314_3() throws Exception { runTest("broken lvt - 3"); diff --git a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/ajc164.xml b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/ajc164.xml index b7cba2424..12b61f240 100644 --- a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/ajc164.xml +++ b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/ajc164.xml @@ -2,7 +2,23 @@ - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +