From: aclement <aclement>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 10:46:47 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: tidied comments.
X-Git-Tag: V1_5_2rc1~48
X-Git-Url: https://source.dussan.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6dbe44d708bbd5d3754a8ab0de31f43c5144ef6c;p=aspectj.git

tidied comments.
---

diff --git a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc152/SynchronizationTests.java b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc152/SynchronizationTests.java
index 893ae9a3c..3d800a268 100644
--- a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc152/SynchronizationTests.java
+++ b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc152/SynchronizationTests.java
@@ -52,10 +52,6 @@ import org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase;
  * x ensure verifier runs over generated code (done by just executing the code as part of the test spec)
  * TAG: Completion of PHASE2
  * 
- * 
- * Need sorting before claiming complete:
- * - coping with asking 'regular' AspectJ to process an Aspect built by this variant of AJ that provides lock()/unlock()
- * - targetting 1.2 runtime
  *
  * TAG: Finished
  *  
@@ -89,9 +85,6 @@ import org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase;
  * 
  * Problems:
  * - Can't run it on a 1.2.1 runtime - just not practical
- * - It ain't going to work with the aspectjrt.jar 1.5.0 that websphere will be shipping.
- *   *IF* someone manages to get into a situation where they ask for the signature of a lock jp, but the lock
- *   jp won't have been exposed if they weren't weaving with a 1.5 weaver...
  * 
  * 
  * Method transformation, example: