From: Nick Burch
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 18:53:47 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Finish region tweaks, and fix up upgrading doc
X-Git-Tag: REL_3_5_BETA2~59
X-Git-Url: https://source.dussan.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=eeb941c3d247e44f75bf6ce45e48ab28a9c1dfc7;p=poi.git
Finish region tweaks, and fix up upgrading doc
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/branches/ooxml@676213 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
---
diff --git a/src/documentation/content/xdocs/spreadsheet/converting.xml b/src/documentation/content/xdocs/spreadsheet/converting.xml
index 2cb8d001e3..b9fcdcd0d6 100644
--- a/src/documentation/content/xdocs/spreadsheet/converting.xml
+++ b/src/documentation/content/xdocs/spreadsheet/converting.xml
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
- Converting existing HSSF Usermodel code to SS Usermodel (for XSSF and HSSF)
+ Upgrading to POI 3.5, including converting existing HSSF Usermodel code to SS Usermodel (for XSSF and HSSF)
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.FormulaEvaluator.CellValue
- org.apache.poi.hssf.usermodel.HSSFRow.MissingCellPolicy
+ org.apache.poi.hssf.usermodel.HSSFRow.MissingCellPolicy
Annoyingly, java will not let you access a static inner class via
a child of the parent one. So, all references to
org.apache.poi.hssf.usermodel.HSSFRow.MissingCellPolicy
@@ -48,8 +48,8 @@
org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.Row.MissingCellPolicy
-
-Converting existing HSSF Usermodel code to SS Usermodel (for XSSF and HSSF)
+
+ Converting existing HSSF Usermodel code to SS Usermodel (for XSSF and HSSF)
Why change?
If you have existing HSSF usermodel code that works just
@@ -86,9 +86,9 @@
otherwise remain the same, and it should all then work for
both XSSF and HSSF.
-
-