From: Nick Burch Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 18:53:47 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Finish region tweaks, and fix up upgrading doc X-Git-Tag: REL_3_5_BETA2~59 X-Git-Url: https://source.dussan.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=eeb941c3d247e44f75bf6ce45e48ab28a9c1dfc7;p=poi.git Finish region tweaks, and fix up upgrading doc git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/branches/ooxml@676213 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- diff --git a/src/documentation/content/xdocs/spreadsheet/converting.xml b/src/documentation/content/xdocs/spreadsheet/converting.xml index 2cb8d001e3..b9fcdcd0d6 100644 --- a/src/documentation/content/xdocs/spreadsheet/converting.xml +++ b/src/documentation/content/xdocs/spreadsheet/converting.xml @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
- Converting existing HSSF Usermodel code to SS Usermodel (for XSSF and HSSF) + Upgrading to POI 3.5, including converting existing HSSF Usermodel code to SS Usermodel (for XSSF and HSSF) @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.FormulaEvaluator.CellValue

-
org.apache.poi.hssf.usermodel.HSSFRow.MissingCellPolicy
+
org.apache.poi.hssf.usermodel.HSSFRow.MissingCellPolicy

Annoyingly, java will not let you access a static inner class via a child of the parent one. So, all references to org.apache.poi.hssf.usermodel.HSSFRow.MissingCellPolicy @@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.Row.MissingCellPolicy

- -
Converting existing HSSF Usermodel code to SS Usermodel (for XSSF and HSSF) +
+
Converting existing HSSF Usermodel code to SS Usermodel (for XSSF and HSSF)
Why change?

If you have existing HSSF usermodel code that works just @@ -86,9 +86,9 @@ otherwise remain the same, and it should all then work for both XSSF and HSSF.

-
-
Worked Examples -
Old HSSF Code +
+
Worked Examples +
Old HSSF Code