From 579ec14c9e86cdbaac656872e26f3e954e8f8946 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: aclement <aclement>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:59:56 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] 175039: incorrect processing of a type parameter that is a
 nested type, test and fix

---
 .../src/org/aspectj/weaver/TypeFactory.java   |  5 ++--
 .../org/aspectj/weaver/TypeXTestCase.java     | 23 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/TypeFactory.java b/weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/TypeFactory.java
index 3168f9ca3..699f07de7 100644
--- a/weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/TypeFactory.java
+++ b/weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/TypeFactory.java
@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ public class TypeFactory {
 			// (see pr122458) It is possible for a parameterized type to have *no* type parameters visible in its signature.
 			// This happens for an inner type of a parameterized type which simply inherits the type parameters
 			// of its parent.  In this case it is parameterized but theres no < in the signature.
-			
 			int startOfParams = signature.indexOf('<');
+			
 			if (startOfParams==-1) {
 				// Should be an inner type of a parameterized type - could assert there is a '$' in the signature....
 				String signatureErasure = "L" + signature.substring(1);
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ public class TypeFactory {
 				// the type parameters of interest are only those that apply to the 'last type' in the signature
 				// if the signature is 'PMyInterface<String>$MyOtherType;' then there are none...
 				String lastType = null;
-				int nestedTypePosition = signature.indexOf("$");
+				int nestedTypePosition = signature.indexOf("$", endOfParams); // don't look for $ INSIDE the parameters
 				if (nestedTypePosition!=-1) lastType = signature.substring(nestedTypePosition+1);
 				else                        lastType = new String(signature);
 				startOfParams = lastType.indexOf("<");
@@ -132,7 +132,6 @@ public class TypeFactory {
 				if (startOfParams!=-1) {
 				  typeParams = createTypeParams(lastType.substring(startOfParams +1, endOfParams));
 				}
-				
 				return new UnresolvedType(signature,signatureErasure,typeParams);
 			}
 			// can't replace above with convertSigToType - leads to stackoverflow
diff --git a/weaver/testsrc/org/aspectj/weaver/TypeXTestCase.java b/weaver/testsrc/org/aspectj/weaver/TypeXTestCase.java
index 5505c092a..231df0c75 100644
--- a/weaver/testsrc/org/aspectj/weaver/TypeXTestCase.java
+++ b/weaver/testsrc/org/aspectj/weaver/TypeXTestCase.java
@@ -122,6 +122,29 @@ public class TypeXTestCase extends TestCase {
 		}
 	}
 	
+	public void testTypeFactoryForParameterizedTypes() {
+		if (LangUtil.is15VMOrGreater()) { // no funny types pre 1.5		
+			UnresolvedType enumOfSimpleType = 
+				TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature("Pjava/lang/Enum<Ljava/lang/String;>;"); 
+			assertEquals(1, enumOfSimpleType.getTypeParameters().length);
+			
+			UnresolvedType enumOfNestedType = 
+				TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature("Pjava/lang/Enum<Ljavax/jws/soap/SOAPBinding$ParameterStyle;>;"); 
+			assertEquals(1, enumOfNestedType.getTypeParameters().length);
+
+			// is this signature right?
+			UnresolvedType nestedTypeOfParameterized = 
+				TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature("PMyInterface<Ljava/lang/String;>$MyOtherType;"); 
+			assertEquals(0, nestedTypeOfParameterized.getTypeParameters().length);
+			
+			// how about this one? is this valid?
+			UnresolvedType doublyNestedTypeSignatures = 
+				TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature("PMyInterface<Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;>$MyOtherType<Ljava/lang/Object;>;"); 
+			assertEquals(1, doublyNestedTypeSignatures.getTypeParameters().length);
+			
+		}
+	}
+	
 	private void checkTX(UnresolvedType tx,boolean shouldBeParameterized,int numberOfTypeParameters) {
 		assertTrue("Expected parameterization flag to be "+shouldBeParameterized,tx.isParameterizedType()==shouldBeParameterized);
 		if (numberOfTypeParameters==0) {
-- 
2.39.5