From a664389a1df42fe4d910621a212464a8c720e4f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andy Clement Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 14:00:46 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Reduced expected performance difference JVM improvements seem to reduce the difference. --- org.aspectj.ajdt.core/testdata/src1/LazyTjp.aj | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/testdata/src1/LazyTjp.aj b/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/testdata/src1/LazyTjp.aj index f3662738c..02226a8af 100644 --- a/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/testdata/src1/LazyTjp.aj +++ b/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/testdata/src1/LazyTjp.aj @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ public class LazyTjp { private static final int N = 10000000; // if lazy tjp is working, then calling the advice that uses thisJoinPoint should // take at least this much longer than using an if pcd to bypass the advice - private static final double minimumRatio = 8.0; + private static final double minimumRatio = 1.8; // was 8 but jvm seems to be improving all the time!! public static void main(String[] args) { Trace.enabled = false; -- 2.39.5