From fb1c7b136f27abc234b8d71dce2160ad4467341b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias Sohn Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 23:41:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Wait for JIT optimization before measuring diff performance On Mac OS X MyerDiffPerformanceTest was failing since during the first few tests the JIT compiler is running in parallel slowing down the tests. When setting the JVM option -Xbatch forcing the JIT to do its work prior to running the code this effect can be avoided. Instead we chose to run some tests without recording prior to the recorded tests since relying on -X JVM parameters isn't portable across JVMs. Use 10k * powers of 2 as sample size instead of odd numbers used before and also improve formatting of performance readings. Bug: 323766 Change-Id: I9a46d73f81a785f399d3cf5a90c8c0516526e048 Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk --- .../jgit/diff/MyersDiffPerformanceTest.java | 16 ++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/org.eclipse.jgit.test/tst/org/eclipse/jgit/diff/MyersDiffPerformanceTest.java b/org.eclipse.jgit.test/tst/org/eclipse/jgit/diff/MyersDiffPerformanceTest.java index 37a9a4d636..b97c1633f7 100644 --- a/org.eclipse.jgit.test/tst/org/eclipse/jgit/diff/MyersDiffPerformanceTest.java +++ b/org.eclipse.jgit.test/tst/org/eclipse/jgit/diff/MyersDiffPerformanceTest.java @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ public class MyersDiffPerformanceTest extends TestCase { return ("diffing " + N / 2 + " bytes took " + runningTime + " ns. N=" + N + ", D=" + D + ", time/(N*D):" + fmt.format(perf1()) + ", time/(N*D^2):" + fmt - .format(perf2())); +.format(perf2()) + "\n"); } } @@ -116,13 +116,21 @@ public class MyersDiffPerformanceTest extends TestCase { public void test() { if (stopwatch!=null) { + // run some tests without recording to let JIT do its optimization + test(10000); + test(20000); + test(10000); + test(20000); + List perfData = new LinkedList(); perfData.add(test(10000)); perfData.add(test(20000)); - perfData.add(test(50000)); + perfData.add(test(40000)); perfData.add(test(80000)); - perfData.add(test(99999)); - perfData.add(test(999999)); + perfData.add(test(160000)); + perfData.add(test(320000)); + perfData.add(test(640000)); + perfData.add(test(1280000)); Comparator c = getComparator(1); double factor = Collections.max(perfData, c).perf1() -- 2.39.5