Move 1.9.20 bug regression tests to the correct spots

Originally, I had intended to release a minor 1.9.19.1 release to fix
some bugs. But then, Java 20 support was implemented and merged, so the
next release will be 1.9.20. Therefore, I moved some bug regression
tests to the 1.9.20 suite.

Relates to #254.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

2 files changed, 32 insertions, 32 deletions

diff --git a/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1919/Bugs1919Tests.java b/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1919/Bugs1919Tests.java
index ba4f99ade..3c921f51a 100644
--- a/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1919/Bugs1919Tests.java
+++ b/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1919/Bugs1919Tests.java
@@ -19,38 +19,6 @@ public class Bugs1919Tests extends XMLBasedAjcTestCase {
     runTest("declare annotation with SOURCE retention");
   }
 
-  public void testSwitchWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE() {
-    runTest("switch with Integer.MAX_VALUE case");
-  }
-
-  public void testParenthesisedExpressionWithAjKeyword() {
-    runTest("parenthesised expression with AspectJ keyword");
-  }
-
-  public void testInterfaceInnerAspectImplicitlyStatic() {
-    runTest("inner aspect of interface is implicitly static");
-  }
-
-  public void testExactArrayTypeMatchCompiledTogether() {
-    runTest("exact array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class");
-  }
-
-  public void testExactArrayTypeMatchCompiledSeparately() {
-    runTest("exact array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class");
-  }
-
-  public void testFuzzyArrayTypeMatchCompiledTogether() {
-    runTest("fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class");
-  }
-
-  public void testFuzzyArrayTypeMatchCompiledSeparately() {
-    runTest("fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class");
-  }
-
-  public void test_GitHub_214() {
-    runTest("ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException with Xlint unorderedAdviceAtShadow=warning");
-  }
-
   public static Test suite() {
     return XMLBasedAjcTestCase.loadSuite(Bugs1919Tests.class);
   }
diff --git a/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/Bugs1920Tests.java b/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/Bugs1920Tests.java
index 593fdb198..574f1b7aa 100644
--- a/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/Bugs1920Tests.java
+++ b/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/Bugs1920Tests.java
@@ -15,6 +15,38 @@ import org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase;
  */
 public class Bugs1920Tests extends XMLBasedAjcTestCase {
 
+  public void testSwitchWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE() {
+    runTest("switch with Integer.MAX_VALUE case");
+  }
+
+  public void testParenthesisedExpressionWithAjKeyword() {
+    runTest("parenthesised expression with AspectJ keyword");
+  }
+
+  public void testInterfaceInnerAspectImplicitlyStatic() {
+    runTest("inner aspect of interface is implicitly static");
+  }
+
+  public void testExactArrayTypeMatchCompiledTogether() {
+    runTest("exact array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class");
+  }
+
+  public void testExactArrayTypeMatchCompiledSeparately() {
+    runTest("exact array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class");
+  }
+
+  public void testFuzzyArrayTypeMatchCompiledTogether() {
+    runTest("fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class");
+  }
+
+  public void testFuzzyArrayTypeMatchCompiledSeparately() {
+    runTest("fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class");
+  }
+
+  public void test_GitHub_214() {
+    runTest("ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException with Xlint unorderedAdviceAtShadow=warning");
+  }
+
   /**
    * Add correct annotations to multiple ITD methods with the same name and same number of arguments, i.e. copy the
    * annotations correctly from the aspect into the target class instead of falsely always copying the annotations (if