aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>2023-08-15 08:58:14 +0700
committerAlexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>2023-08-15 08:58:14 +0700
commit565f37b1970268234d9a823e2631ba3ed3e03037 (patch)
treedc627f09995beee7932da7056a2be279294d9c0e /tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest
parent364059c00f2393b8221cea29bdb6b7eabfd5b5c0 (diff)
downloadaspectj-565f37b1970268234d9a823e2631ba3ed3e03037.tar.gz
aspectj-565f37b1970268234d9a823e2631ba3ed3e03037.zip
Move 1.9.20 bug regression tests to the correct spots
Originally, I had intended to release a minor 1.9.19.1 release to fix some bugs. But then, Java 20 support was implemented and merged, so the next release will be 1.9.20. Therefore, I moved some bug regression tests to the 1.9.20 suite. Relates to #254. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest')
-rw-r--r--tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1919/ajc1919.xml215
-rw-r--r--tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/ajc1920.xml215
2 files changed, 215 insertions, 215 deletions
diff --git a/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1919/ajc1919.xml b/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1919/ajc1919.xml
index f8bccce64..dd3f2b1a2 100644
--- a/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1919/ajc1919.xml
+++ b/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1919/ajc1919.xml
@@ -172,219 +172,4 @@
</compile>
</ajc-test>
- <!-- RuntimeException in BcelWeaver, see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/190 -->
- <ajc-test dir="bugs1919/github_190" vm="1.5" title="switch with Integer.MAX_VALUE case">
- <compile files="SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
- <message kind="weave" text="Join point 'method-execution(java.lang.String SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.switchTest(int))'"/>
- </compile>
- <run class="SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE">
- <stdout>
- <line text="execution(String SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.switchTest(int))"/>
- <line text="CASE_1"/>
- </stdout>
- </run>
- </ajc-test>
-
- <!--
- 'Syntax error, insert "Expression" to complete Expression' when compiling parenthesised expressions
- containing AspectJ keywords, e.g. '(before)', see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/20
- -->
- <ajc-test dir="bugs1919/github_20" vm="1.5" title="parenthesised expression with AspectJ keyword">
- <compile files="ParenthesisedAJKeywords.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo"/>
- <run class="ParenthesisedAJKeywords">
- <stdout>
- <line text="before"/>
- <line text="after"/>
- <line text="around"/>
- <line text="aspect"/>
- <line text="pointcut"/>
- <line text="declare"/>
- <line text="privileged"/>
- </stdout>
- </run>
- </ajc-test>
-
- <!--
- 'inner aspects must be static' when compiling an interface with an inner aspect which was not explicitly declared
- static, see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/162
- -->
- <ajc-test dir="bugs1919/github_162" vm="1.5" title="inner aspect of interface is implicitly static">
- <compile files="InterfaceWithInnerClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic.getNumber())' in Type 'InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic'"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(void InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic.main(java.lang.String[]))' in Type 'InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic'"/>
- </compile>
- <run class="InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic">
- <stdout>
- <line text="execution(void InterfaceWithInnerClass.ImplicitlyStatic.main(String[]))"/>
- <line text="execution(int InterfaceWithInnerClass.ImplicitlyStatic.getNumber())"/>
- <line text="11"/>
- </stdout>
- </run>
- </ajc-test>
-
- <!--
- When compiling aspect and target class together, matching works as expected,
- see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
- -->
- <ajc-test dir="bugs1919/github_24" vm="1.5" title="exact array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class">
- <compile files="ExactlyMatchingAspect.aj MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
- <!-- Even before the bugfix, in this case weaving worked as expected -->
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
- </compile>
- <run class="MaybeMissingClass">
- <stdout>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f1"/>
- <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f2"/>
- <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f3"/>
- <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f4"/>
- <line text="execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f5"/>
- <line text="execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f6"/>
- <line text="execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
- </stdout>
- </run>
- </ajc-test>
-
- <!--
- When compiling aspect and target class separately, too many joinpoints are matched,
- see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
- -->
- <ajc-test dir="bugs1919/github_24" vm="1.5" title="exact array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class">
- <compile files="ExactlyMatchingAspect.aj" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" outjar="aspect.jar">
- <message kind="warning" text="no match for this type name: MaybeMissingClass [Xlint:invalidAbsoluteTypeName]"/>
- <message kind="warning" text="advice defined in ExactlyMatchingAspect has not been applied [Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch]"/>
- </compile>
- <compile files="MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" aspectpath="aspect.jar">
- <!-- Before the bugfix, f1 would be woven twice, f2 not at all-->
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
- </compile>
- <run class="MaybeMissingClass" classpath="aspect.jar">
- <stdout>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f1"/>
- <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f2"/>
- <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f3"/>
- <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f4"/>
- <line text="execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f5"/>
- <line text="execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f6"/>
- <line text="execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
- </stdout>
- </run>
- </ajc-test>
-
- <!--
- When compiling aspect and target class together, too many joinpoints are matched,
- see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
- -->
- <ajc-test dir="bugs1919/github_24" vm="1.5" title="fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class">
- <compile files="FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
- <!-- Before the bugfix, both f1 and f2 would be woven twice -->
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
- </compile>
- <run class="MaybeMissingClass">
- <stdout>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f1"/>
- <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f2"/>
- <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f3"/>
- <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f4"/>
- <line text="execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f5"/>
- <line text="execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f6"/>
- <line text="execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
- </stdout>
- </run>
- </ajc-test>
-
- <!--
- When compiling aspect and target class separately, too many joinpoints are matched,
- see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
- -->
- <ajc-test dir="bugs1919/github_24" vm="1.5" title="fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class">
- <compile files="FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" outjar="aspect.jar">
- <message kind="warning" text="advice defined in FuzzilyMatchingAspect has not been applied [Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch]"/>
- </compile>
- <compile files="MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" aspectpath="aspect.jar">
- <!-- Before the bugfix, both f1 and f2 would be woven twice -->
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
- </compile>
- <run class="MaybeMissingClass" classpath="aspect.jar">
- <stdout>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f1"/>
- <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f2"/>
- <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f3"/>
- <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f4"/>
- <line text="execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f5"/>
- <line text="execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
- <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f6"/>
- <line text="execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
- </stdout>
- </run>
- </ajc-test>
-
- <!--
- https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/214
- https://github.com/mojohaus/aspectj-maven-plugin/issues/164
- Problem with multiple, subsequent weaving steps and '-Xlint:warning' or '-Xlint:unorderedAdviceAtShadow=warning'
- java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 1
- [ERROR] at org.aspectj.weaver.bcel.BcelShadow.prepareForMungers(BcelShadow.java:379)
- [ERROR] at org.aspectj.weaver.Shadow.implement(Shadow.java:546)
- -->
- <ajc-test dir="bugs1919/github_214" vm="1.5" title="ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException with Xlint unorderedAdviceAtShadow=warning">
- <compile files="FirstAspect.java MarkerOne.java" options="-1.8 -showWeaveInfo -Xlint:warning" outjar="first-aspect.jar">
- <message kind="warning" text="can not build thisJoinPoint lazily for this advice since it has no suitable guard [Xlint:noGuardForLazyTjp]"/>
- <message kind="warning" text="advice defined in FirstAspect has not been applied [Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch]"/>
- </compile>
- <compile files="Application.java MarkerTwo.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo -Xlint:warning" classpath="$sandbox/first-aspect.jar" outjar="application.jar"/>
- <compile files="SecondAspect.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo -Xlint:warning" aspectpath="first-aspect.jar" inpath="application.jar" outjar="second-aspect.jar">
- <message kind="warning" text="can not build thisJoinPoint lazily for this advice since it has no suitable guard [Xlint:noGuardForLazyTjp]"/>
- <message kind="warning" text="at this shadow method-execution(void Application.greet(java.lang.String)) no precedence is specified between advice applying from aspect FirstAspect and aspect SecondAspect [Xlint:unorderedAdviceAtShadow]"/>
- <message kind="warning" text="can not implement lazyTjp at joinpoint method-execution(void Application.greet(java.lang.String)) because of advice conflicts, see secondary locations to find conflicting advice [Xlint:multipleAdviceStoppingLazyTjp]"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(void Application.greet(java.lang.String))' in Type 'Application' (Application.java:4) advised by around advice from 'SecondAspect'"/>
- <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(void Application.greet(java.lang.String))' in Type 'Application' (Application.java:4) advised by before advice from 'FirstAspect'"/>
- </compile>
- <run class="Application" classpath="$sandbox/second-aspect.jar,$sandbox/first-aspect.jar">
- <stdout>
- <line text="FirstAspect: execution(void Application.greet(String))"/>
- <line text="SecondAspect: execution(void Application.greet(String))"/>
- <line text="Hello world!"/>
- </stdout>
- </run>
- </ajc-test>
-
</suite>
diff --git a/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/ajc1920.xml b/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/ajc1920.xml
index ed301b4f3..402f50a2f 100644
--- a/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/ajc1920.xml
+++ b/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/ajc1920.xml
@@ -176,6 +176,221 @@
</run>
</ajc-test>
+ <!-- RuntimeException in BcelWeaver, see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/190 -->
+ <ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_190" vm="1.5" title="switch with Integer.MAX_VALUE case">
+ <compile files="SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
+ <message kind="weave" text="Join point 'method-execution(java.lang.String SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.switchTest(int))'"/>
+ </compile>
+ <run class="SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE">
+ <stdout>
+ <line text="execution(String SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.switchTest(int))"/>
+ <line text="CASE_1"/>
+ </stdout>
+ </run>
+ </ajc-test>
+
+ <!--
+ 'Syntax error, insert "Expression" to complete Expression' when compiling parenthesised expressions
+ containing AspectJ keywords, e.g. '(before)', see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/20
+ -->
+ <ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_20" vm="1.5" title="parenthesised expression with AspectJ keyword">
+ <compile files="ParenthesisedAJKeywords.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo"/>
+ <run class="ParenthesisedAJKeywords">
+ <stdout>
+ <line text="before"/>
+ <line text="after"/>
+ <line text="around"/>
+ <line text="aspect"/>
+ <line text="pointcut"/>
+ <line text="declare"/>
+ <line text="privileged"/>
+ </stdout>
+ </run>
+ </ajc-test>
+
+ <!--
+ 'inner aspects must be static' when compiling an interface with an inner aspect which was not explicitly declared
+ static, see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/162
+ -->
+ <ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_162" vm="1.5" title="inner aspect of interface is implicitly static">
+ <compile files="InterfaceWithInnerClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic.getNumber())' in Type 'InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic'"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(void InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic.main(java.lang.String[]))' in Type 'InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic'"/>
+ </compile>
+ <run class="InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic">
+ <stdout>
+ <line text="execution(void InterfaceWithInnerClass.ImplicitlyStatic.main(String[]))"/>
+ <line text="execution(int InterfaceWithInnerClass.ImplicitlyStatic.getNumber())"/>
+ <line text="11"/>
+ </stdout>
+ </run>
+ </ajc-test>
+
+ <!--
+ When compiling aspect and target class together, matching works as expected,
+ see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
+ -->
+ <ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_24" vm="1.5" title="exact array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class">
+ <compile files="ExactlyMatchingAspect.aj MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
+ <!-- Even before the bugfix, in this case weaving worked as expected -->
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+ </compile>
+ <run class="MaybeMissingClass">
+ <stdout>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f1"/>
+ <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f2"/>
+ <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f3"/>
+ <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f4"/>
+ <line text="execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f5"/>
+ <line text="execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f6"/>
+ <line text="execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+ </stdout>
+ </run>
+ </ajc-test>
+
+ <!--
+ When compiling aspect and target class separately, too many joinpoints are matched,
+ see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
+ -->
+ <ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_24" vm="1.5" title="exact array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class">
+ <compile files="ExactlyMatchingAspect.aj" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" outjar="aspect.jar">
+ <message kind="warning" text="no match for this type name: MaybeMissingClass [Xlint:invalidAbsoluteTypeName]"/>
+ <message kind="warning" text="advice defined in ExactlyMatchingAspect has not been applied [Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch]"/>
+ </compile>
+ <compile files="MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" aspectpath="aspect.jar">
+ <!-- Before the bugfix, f1 would be woven twice, f2 not at all-->
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+ </compile>
+ <run class="MaybeMissingClass" classpath="aspect.jar">
+ <stdout>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f1"/>
+ <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f2"/>
+ <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f3"/>
+ <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f4"/>
+ <line text="execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f5"/>
+ <line text="execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f6"/>
+ <line text="execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+ </stdout>
+ </run>
+ </ajc-test>
+
+ <!--
+ When compiling aspect and target class together, too many joinpoints are matched,
+ see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
+ -->
+ <ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_24" vm="1.5" title="fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class">
+ <compile files="FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
+ <!-- Before the bugfix, both f1 and f2 would be woven twice -->
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+ </compile>
+ <run class="MaybeMissingClass">
+ <stdout>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f1"/>
+ <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f2"/>
+ <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f3"/>
+ <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f4"/>
+ <line text="execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f5"/>
+ <line text="execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f6"/>
+ <line text="execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+ </stdout>
+ </run>
+ </ajc-test>
+
+ <!--
+ When compiling aspect and target class separately, too many joinpoints are matched,
+ see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
+ -->
+ <ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_24" vm="1.5" title="fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class">
+ <compile files="FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" outjar="aspect.jar">
+ <message kind="warning" text="advice defined in FuzzilyMatchingAspect has not been applied [Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch]"/>
+ </compile>
+ <compile files="MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" aspectpath="aspect.jar">
+ <!-- Before the bugfix, both f1 and f2 would be woven twice -->
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+ </compile>
+ <run class="MaybeMissingClass" classpath="aspect.jar">
+ <stdout>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f1"/>
+ <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f2"/>
+ <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f3"/>
+ <line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f4"/>
+ <line text="execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f5"/>
+ <line text="execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+ <line text="MaybeMissingClass.f6"/>
+ <line text="execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+ </stdout>
+ </run>
+ </ajc-test>
+
+ <!--
+ https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/214
+ https://github.com/mojohaus/aspectj-maven-plugin/issues/164
+ Problem with multiple, subsequent weaving steps and '-Xlint:warning' or '-Xlint:unorderedAdviceAtShadow=warning'
+ java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 1
+ [ERROR] at org.aspectj.weaver.bcel.BcelShadow.prepareForMungers(BcelShadow.java:379)
+ [ERROR] at org.aspectj.weaver.Shadow.implement(Shadow.java:546)
+ -->
+ <ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_214" vm="1.5" title="ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException with Xlint unorderedAdviceAtShadow=warning">
+ <compile files="FirstAspect.java MarkerOne.java" options="-1.8 -showWeaveInfo -Xlint:warning" outjar="first-aspect.jar">
+ <message kind="warning" text="can not build thisJoinPoint lazily for this advice since it has no suitable guard [Xlint:noGuardForLazyTjp]"/>
+ <message kind="warning" text="advice defined in FirstAspect has not been applied [Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch]"/>
+ </compile>
+ <compile files="Application.java MarkerTwo.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo -Xlint:warning" classpath="$sandbox/first-aspect.jar" outjar="application.jar"/>
+ <compile files="SecondAspect.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo -Xlint:warning" aspectpath="first-aspect.jar" inpath="application.jar" outjar="second-aspect.jar">
+ <message kind="warning" text="can not build thisJoinPoint lazily for this advice since it has no suitable guard [Xlint:noGuardForLazyTjp]"/>
+ <message kind="warning" text="at this shadow method-execution(void Application.greet(java.lang.String)) no precedence is specified between advice applying from aspect FirstAspect and aspect SecondAspect [Xlint:unorderedAdviceAtShadow]"/>
+ <message kind="warning" text="can not implement lazyTjp at joinpoint method-execution(void Application.greet(java.lang.String)) because of advice conflicts, see secondary locations to find conflicting advice [Xlint:multipleAdviceStoppingLazyTjp]"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(void Application.greet(java.lang.String))' in Type 'Application' (Application.java:4) advised by around advice from 'SecondAspect'"/>
+ <message kind="weave" text="method-execution(void Application.greet(java.lang.String))' in Type 'Application' (Application.java:4) advised by before advice from 'FirstAspect'"/>
+ </compile>
+ <run class="Application" classpath="$sandbox/second-aspect.jar,$sandbox/first-aspect.jar">
+ <stdout>
+ <line text="FirstAspect: execution(void Application.greet(String))"/>
+ <line text="SecondAspect: execution(void Application.greet(String))"/>
+ <line text="Hello world!"/>
+ </stdout>
+ </run>
+ </ajc-test>
+
<!-- https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/246 -->
<ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_246" vm="8" title="add correct annotations to multiple ITD methods with the same name and same number of arguments">
<compile files="First.java Second.java App.java ITDAspect.aj" options="-8"/>