aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/util
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>2022-10-03 16:36:33 +0200
committerAlexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>2022-10-03 17:07:39 +0200
commit2548a8ab0b3649ed3fc8eac331ebeb1f28f02c3d (patch)
tree3da37bb9b3946f45c36facebccd2621d921a87ba /util
parent7ef7cd245b2d62581d67c122a95cb29d8b0dbb76 (diff)
downloadaspectj-2548a8ab0b3649ed3fc8eac331ebeb1f28f02c3d.tar.gz
aspectj-2548a8ab0b3649ed3fc8eac331ebeb1f28f02c3d.zip
Deactivate Java 18 preview language feature tests
and enable LangUtil to parse Java versions like '19+36-2238'. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Diffstat (limited to 'util')
-rw-r--r--util/src/main/java/org/aspectj/util/LangUtil.java20
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/util/src/main/java/org/aspectj/util/LangUtil.java b/util/src/main/java/org/aspectj/util/LangUtil.java
index 944e95040..02aa7d94b 100644
--- a/util/src/main/java/org/aspectj/util/LangUtil.java
+++ b/util/src/main/java/org/aspectj/util/LangUtil.java
@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ public class LangUtil {
static {
// http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/versioning-naming-139433.html
// http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/223 "New Version-String Scheme"
+ // TODO: Use java.lang.Runtime class (since Java 9, now AspectJ needs Java 11+ due to JDT Core anyway)
+ final String JAVA_VERSION_NOT_FOUND = "System properties appear damaged, cannot find: java.version/java.runtime.version/java.vm.version";
try {
String vm = System.getProperty("java.version"); // JLS 20.18.7
if (vm == null) {
@@ -66,15 +68,12 @@ public class LangUtil {
vm = System.getProperty("java.vm.version");
}
if (vm == null) {
- new RuntimeException(
- "System properties appear damaged, cannot find: java.version/java.runtime.version/java.vm.version")
- .printStackTrace(System.err);
+ new RuntimeException(JAVA_VERSION_NOT_FOUND).printStackTrace(System.err);
vmVersion = 1.5;
} else {
- // Version: [1-9][0-9]*((\.0)*\.[1-9][0-9]*)*
// Care about the first set of digits and second set if first digit is 1
try {
- List<Integer> numbers = getFirstNumbers(vm);
+ List<Integer> numbers = getJavaMajorMinor(vm);
if (numbers.get(0) == 1) {
// Old school for 1.0 > 1.8
vmVersion = numbers.get(0)+(numbers.get(1)/10d);
@@ -89,18 +88,19 @@ public class LangUtil {
}
}
} catch (Throwable t) {
- new RuntimeException(
- "System properties appear damaged, cannot find: java.version/java.runtime.version/java.vm.version", t)
- .printStackTrace(System.err);
+ new RuntimeException(JAVA_VERSION_NOT_FOUND, t).printStackTrace(System.err);
vmVersion = 1.5;
}
}
- private static List<Integer> getFirstNumbers(String vm) {
+ private static List<Integer> getJavaMajorMinor(String vm) {
List<Integer> result = new ArrayList<>();
- StringTokenizer st = new StringTokenizer(vm,".-_");
+ // Can be something like '1.5', '11.0.16.1', '19+36-2238'
+ StringTokenizer st = new StringTokenizer(vm,".-_+");
try {
result.add(Integer.parseInt(st.nextToken()));
+ // FIXME: The minor will be wrong for version strings like '19+36-2238'.
+ // The minor is only relevant for Java <= 1.8. Even so, this is super ugly.
result.add(Integer.parseInt(st.nextToken()));
} catch (Exception e) {
// NoSuchElementException if no more tokens