diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/progguide/implementation.adoc')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/progguide/implementation.adoc | 16 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/docs/progguide/implementation.adoc b/docs/progguide/implementation.adoc index 42ee2e37e..03a0e19ae 100644 --- a/docs/progguide/implementation.adoc +++ b/docs/progguide/implementation.adoc @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ [[implementation]] -== Implementation Notes += Implementation Notes -=== Compiler Notes +== Compiler Notes The initial implementations of AspectJ have all been compiler-based implementations. Certain elements of AspectJ's semantics are difficult @@ -108,10 +108,10 @@ used. During your development, you will have to be aware of the limitations of the _ajc_ compiler you're using, but these limitations should not drive the design of your aspects. -=== Bytecode Notes +== Bytecode Notes [[the-class-expression-and-string-plus]] -==== The `.class` expression and `String` `+` +=== The `.class` expression and `String` `+` The java language form `Foo.class` is implemented in bytecode with a call to `Class.forName` guarded by an exception handler catching a @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ class Test { In short, the join point model of the current AspectJ compiler considers these as valid join points. -==== The `handler()` join point +=== The `handler()` join point The end of exception handlers cannot reliably be found in Java bytecode. Instead of removing the `handler` join point entirely, the current AspectJ @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ A source-code implementation of AspectJ (such as AspectJ 1.0.6) is able to detect the endpoint of a handler join point, and as such will likely have fewer such restrictions. -==== Initializers and Inter-type Constructors +=== Initializers and Inter-type Constructors The code for Java initializers, such as the assignment to the field `d` in @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ aspect A { It is the job of an inter-type constructor to do all the required initialization, or to delegate to a `this` constructor if necessary. -=== Annotation-style Notes +== Annotation-style Notes Writing aspects in annotation-style is subject to the same bytecode limitations since the binary aspects take the same form and are woven in @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ the same way. However, the implementation differences (e.g., the mechanism for implementing `around` advice) may be apparent at runtime. See the documentation on annotation-style for more information. -=== Summary of implementation requirements +== Summary of implementation requirements This summarizes the requirements of our implementation of AspectJ. For more details, see the relevant sections of this guide. |