diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/release/changes.adoc')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/release/changes.adoc | 70 |
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 35 deletions
diff --git a/docs/release/changes.adoc b/docs/release/changes.adoc index 5a790a0ff..7793ca6ac 100644 --- a/docs/release/changes.adoc +++ b/docs/release/changes.adoc @@ -423,17 +423,17 @@ synch with resources on disk. JBuilder 7 is now supported. All known bugs have been fixed including: -* http://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=787[787] AJDE for JBuilder throws +* https://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=787[787] AJDE for JBuilder throws exception given non-existent file -* http://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=788[788] Label too small in error +* https://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=788[788] Label too small in error message -* http://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=789[789] Index-out-of-bounds +* https://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=789[789] Index-out-of-bounds exception in JBuilder AJDE -* http://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=792[792] Required libraries +* https://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=792[792] Required libraries disappear from JBuilder 6 -* http://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=795[795] Unable to compile open +* https://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=795[795] Unable to compile open tools -* http://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=802[802] AJDE loses current +* https://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=802[802] AJDE loses current (cursor) position in file when switching files In addition, thanks to user feedback that indicated trouble building @@ -443,9 +443,9 @@ with itself. [[_1_0_6ajdoc]] == Ajdoc -* Fixed http://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=790[790] aspect code +* Fixed https://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=790[790] aspect code comments suppressed by fix to bug 710 -* Known problems: http://aspectj.org/bugs/ajdoc +* Known problems: https://aspectj.org/bugs/ajdoc ''''' @@ -545,14 +545,14 @@ your path, and the class that you expect to execute on your classpath. Bug fixes: -* http://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=710[710 - compiler-generated +* https://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=710[710 - compiler-generated constructor shown with class comment] -* http://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=712[712 - comments lost in aspect +* https://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=712[712 - comments lost in aspect docs for methods or constructors declared on other types.] -* http://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=719[719 - poor support for @link, +* https://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=719[719 - poor support for @link, @see tags] -* http://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=742[742 - crash with @see tag] -* http://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=751[751 - error loading doclet +* https://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=742[742 - crash with @see tag] +* https://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=751[751 - error loading doclet resource] [[_1_0_5anttasks]] @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ resource] Bug fixes: -* http://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=730[730 - document all supported +* https://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=730[730 - document all supported ajc flags] ''''' @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ J2SE 1.3 be on the classpath. * Repackaged to fit into the AspectJ product directory - e.g., `aspectj-ant.jar` moved to `lib` as expected by `examples/build.xml`. -* Fixed bugs, esp. http://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=682[682]: Throw +* Fixed bugs, esp. https://aspectj.org/bugs/resolved?id=682[682]: Throw BuildException if failonerror and ajdoc detects misconfiguration. [[_1_0_4doc]] @@ -712,9 +712,9 @@ reported in 1.0.1. == Compiler * Official support for `-source 1.4` option to compile new -http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/guide/lang/assert.html[1.4 +https://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/guide/lang/assert.html[1.4 assertions]. This makes ajc completely compatible with j2se-1.4. -* Implementation of http://jcp.org/jsr/detail/45.jsp[JSR-45 Debugging +* Implementation of https://jcp.org/jsr/detail/45.jsp[JSR-45 Debugging Support for Other Languages] so that debuggers which correctly implement this specification will be able to accurately debug any AspectJ program at a source code level. We are not currently aware of any debuggers that @@ -726,27 +726,27 @@ type patterns used in pcds have no bindings. We are very interested in feedback on the usefulness and suggested improvements for this feature. * Several significant bugs in the implementation of around advice have been fixed. These include issues with -http://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=632[dynamic +https://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=632[dynamic tests], with -http://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=620[complicated +https://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=620[complicated local types in an around body], and with -http://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=636[capturing +https://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=636[capturing proceed in a closure]. * All but two -(http://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/compiler?id=626[1], -http://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/compiler?id=645[2]) verified +(https://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/compiler?id=626[1], +https://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/compiler?id=645[2]) verified bugs in 1.0.1 have been fixed. The two outstanding bugs have relatively easy work-arounds. Thanks as usual to everyone who submitted a bug report. * We no longer use the `SYNTHETIC` attribute to label declarations added by the aspectj compiler. We were using this attribute in compliance with -http://java.sun.com/docs/books/vmspec/2nd-edition/html/ClassFile.doc.html#80128[the +https://java.sun.com/docs/books/vmspec/2nd-edition/html/ClassFile.doc.html#80128[the JVM Specification]; however, we've found that many tools expect this attribute to only be used for the narrow purpose of implementing Java's inner classes and that using it for other synthetic members can confuse them. This led to problems both -http://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=649[with javap] -and http://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=646[with +https://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=649[with javap] +and https://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=646[with javac]. * Changes required adding runtime classes, so please compile and run using the latest `aspectjrt.jar` @@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ This release fixes a significant performance issue in the compiler, reported by Rich Price, that could lead to extremely long compiles in systems with many aspects and classes. Several other small bugs related to reporting compilation errors have also been fixed, see -http://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=610[this bug +https://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=610[this bug report] for an example. A new experimental flag has been added, `-XaddSafePrefix`, that will @@ -855,10 +855,10 @@ below: which are also produced by other compilers) that caused verify errors when dealing with nested try-finally and synchronized statements. These are now fixed. More details are available -http://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=601[here] and -http://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=595[here] +https://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=601[here] and +https://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=595[here] * Jan Hannemann submitted a -http://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=600[succint and +https://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=600[succint and clear bug report] for a difficult intermittant bug. The bug led to the compiler sometimes generating illegal code when introduced methods on a class overrode introduced methods on an interface implemented by that @@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ visibility === AJBrowser * Documentation for the browser is now available at -http://aspectj.org/docs +https://aspectj.org/docs === Emacs Support: aspectj-mode and AJDEE @@ -918,11 +918,11 @@ There have been several minor clarifications/changes to the language. * Thanks to Robin Green for suggesting that we could relax the rules for inheriting multiple concrete members in order to allow those unambiguous cases where one member has already overridden the other. -http://aspectj.org/pipermail/users/2001/001289.html[More details...] +https://aspectj.org/pipermail/users/2001/001289.html[More details...] * Ron Bodkin encouraged us to examine the details of privileged aspects more closely. This led to several small improvements and clarifications to this language feature. -http://aspectj.org/pipermail/users/2001/001258.html[More details...] +https://aspectj.org/pipermail/users/2001/001258.html[More details...] [[_1_0rc3compiler]] == Compiler @@ -936,14 +936,14 @@ for some references to interface fields result in verify errors on certain JVMs. While this is a known bug in those JVMs, we've modified ajc to be bug compatible with all the other Java compilers out there to work-around this JVM bug. -http://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=551[More +https://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=551[More details...] * Frank Hunleth discovered a similar bug where ajc's correct bytecodes could lead to essentially random method dispath due to a bad bug in the 1.3.0 JVM from Sun. Even though this bug was fixed in the 1.3.1 and 1.2.2 JVMs, we have introduced the appropriate work-around in ajc's code generation. -http://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=580[More +https://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=580[More details...] * Thomas Haug (as well as several other members of his group) reported a problem with name binding where ajc was behaving differently than javac. @@ -952,7 +952,7 @@ that conflicted with his package names. The JLS doesn't clearly specify which of these two behaviors is correct. Nevertheless, ajc has been changed to treat packages more like javac does in order to minimize this sort of problem in the future. -http://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=574[More +https://aspectj.org/jitterbug/aspectj-bugs/resolved?id=574[More details...] * Several "real" bugs in ajc were also reported and fixed. Toby Allsopp gets credit for reporting two of them. The most interesting of these |