aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/build
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Move to 1.9.25-SNAPSHOT buildsAndrew Clement2025-04-131-1/+1
|
* 1.9.24 releaseV1_9_24Andrew Clement2025-04-101-1/+1
|
* Set versions to AspectJ 1.9.24-SNAPSHOTAndrew Clement2025-03-131-1/+1
|
* Set pom versions to 1.9.23 for releaseV1_9_23Andrew Clement2025-03-131-1/+1
|
* Set version to 1.9.23-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2024-05-111-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release AspectJ 1.9.22.1V1_9_22_1Alexander Kriegisch2024-05-111-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.23-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2024-03-231-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release AspectJ 1.9.22Alexander Kriegisch2024-03-231-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.22-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2024-03-131-1/+1
|
* Release AspectJ 1.9.21.2V1_9_21_2Alexander Kriegisch2024-03-131-1/+1
|
* Remove obsolete stuff from module 'build' and lib/buildAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-167-2659/+0
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Add decade 2020-2029 to copyright years in ChecklicsAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-161-4/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | FWIW, I just wanted to know if the tests in module 'build' would still pass. They did not find copyrights for more recent years, so I added them here. But I am still unsure, if we need these tests at all. Obviously, they were not running during CI builds, i.e. they seem to be non-essential. But chances are, they were forgotten to be added to the suite. BTW, running the tests in module 'build' with '-Drun.build.tests=true' is failing, too, because some old JDK classes looked up there no longer exist in more recent JDKs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Globally replace "http:" by "https:" in non-XML filesAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-152-4/+3
| | | | | | | | | Maybe, the XML files and Maven wrapper files will follow. First, let us find out if this breaks the build, maybe some tests are asserting on "http:". But there, the replacement would also have taken place, so probably it just works. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.22-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-141-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release 1.9.21.1V1_9_21_1Alexander Kriegisch2024-02-141-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Update InstallContext.onWindowsPro for Windows 11+Alexander Kriegisch2024-01-291-3/+4
| | | | | | | | | The matcher is more future-proof now, as long as Windows names stay "Windows Server.*" and "Windows [1-8][0-9]?". This is not beautiful, but a quick drive-by improvement. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Delete obsolete filesAlexander Kriegisch2024-01-0719-368/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | - Redundant copies of HTML files used in AspectJ installer, which already exist as resource files in module 'build' - Null-sized AspectJ library JARs which probably were used to trigger certain build steps in the former Ant build - BridgeVersion.java.txt, which has been replaced by a regular org.aspectj.bridge.Version class which can dynamically determine versions from a properties file instead of relying on them being hard-coded into the template. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Bugfix: AspectJ installer extracts text files as US-ASCIIAlexander Kriegisch2024-01-061-4/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | When extracting text or HTML files, special characters like German umlauts "ÄÖÜäöüß" or copyright symbol "©" were destroyed while unpacking the installer archive. As our files in Git SCM are all UTF-8, the installer now also uses UTF-8 to read and write text files. Fixes #270. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Bulk-rename release read-me files to version numbers with dotsAlexander Kriegisch2024-01-061-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | Also rename references. E.g. - RELEASE-11 -> RELEASE-1.1 - RELEASE-1810 -> RELEASE-1.8.10 - RELEASE-1921 -> RELEASE-1.9.21 Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Remove references and docs about obsolete toolsAlexander Kriegisch2024-01-061-119/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | - AspectJ Browser (ajbrowser) - Forte IDE integration - JBuilder IDE integration - Emacs integration All this information was old and outdated. Ajbrowser was removed from AspectJ a while ago. If the other tools even still exist, any possibly existing AspectJ support is not part of AspectJ itself. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Remove all references to AOSD, but mention SpringAlexander Kriegisch2024-01-061-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - The website is just a front page. - I failed to contact anyone via: * fb9553b7471df638478bbf918044bf52.gdrp@customers.whoisprivacycorp.com * info@aosd.net * admin@aosd.net - The discuss@aosd.net mailing list had its last post 6 years ago and the last one concerning AspectJ 11 years ago according to the archive at https://discuss.aosd.narkive.com/. Mention Spring support for native AspectJ an Spring AOP as a real world example in the FAQ. Also remove an FAQ link to a no longer existing PARC website about AspectJ and fix a small typo. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Globally replace HTTP links to eclipse.org by HTTPSAlexander Kriegisch2024-01-067-146/+145
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.21.1-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-12-151-1/+1
| | | | | | | Currently, the situation looks more like a Java 21 maintenance release than directly a Java 22 release. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.22-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-12-111-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release AspectJ 1.9.21V1_9_21Alexander Kriegisch2023-12-111-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.21-SNAPSHOT againAlexander Kriegisch2023-12-021-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release candidate 1.9.21.RC1V1_9_21_RC1Alexander Kriegisch2023-12-021-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version 1.9.21-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-11-191-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release milestone 1.9.21.M1V1_9_21_M1Alexander Kriegisch2023-11-191-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.21-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-09-041-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* AspectJ release 1.9.20.1Alexander Kriegisch2023-09-041-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.21-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-08-161-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release 1.9.20V1_9_20Alexander Kriegisch2023-08-161-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.20-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-12-211-1/+1
|
* AspectJ release 1.9.19V1_9_19Alexander Kriegisch2022-12-211-1/+1
|
* Set Maven version to 1.9.19-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-10-021-1/+1
| | | | | | | It makes sense to indicate the Java version in the minor-minor of AspectJ artifacts. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Reduce 'Object' class usageAndrey Turbanov2022-04-153-8/+6
|
* Remove redundant casts after generics updateAndrey Turbanov2022-04-121-1/+1
|
* Remove AspectJ Browser (ajbrowser) code and documentationAlexander Kriegisch2022-04-028-28/+13
| | | | | | | Closes #148. TODO: Should more AJDE stuff be removed? Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.10-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-03-311-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release AspectJ version 1.9.9.1V1_9_9_1Alexander Kriegisch2022-03-311-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.10-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-03-241-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.9V1_9_9Alexander Kriegisch2022-03-241-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.9-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-02-111-1/+1
|
* Set version to 1.9.8V1_9_8Alexander Kriegisch2022-02-111-1/+1
|
* Merge pull request #101 from turbanoff/use_StringBuilder_instead_of_StringBufferAndy Clement2021-11-3011-16/+16
|\ | | | | Replace uses of StringBuffer with StringBuilder.
| * Replace uses of StringBuffer with StringBuilder.Andrey Turbanov2021-11-2011-16/+16
| | | | | | | | StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. StringBuilder is a direct replacement to StringBuffer which generally have better performance.
* | Merge pull request #100 from ↵Andy Clement2021-11-291-1/+1
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | turbanoff/File.exists_before_File.isDirectory_is_redundant Remove redundant File.exists() check before File.isDirectory()
| * | According to javadoc File.isDirectory 'true' if and only if the file denoted ↵Andrey Turbanov2021-11-201-1/+1
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | by this abstract pathname exists and is a directory. It means that separate File.exists() check before File.isDirectory() check is redundant.
* / Minor 1.9.7 to 1.9.8 version bumps in docs and Ant scriptAlexander Kriegisch2021-11-201-4/+3
|/ | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2025-07-01 06:08:32 +0000