aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc198/Ajc198TestsJava.java
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* New abstract class JavaVersionSpecificXMLBasedAjcTestCaseAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-191-6/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Replaces now obsolete base classes - XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava[n]OrLater, - XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava[n]Only. The new class is parametrised with minimum and maximum Java version and hence can replace all the other classes. This does not only apply the DRY principle, but also makes adding tests for new Java versions less tedious. By chance, I also noticed missing sanity tests for Java 12, which I added as a little drive-by benefit. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Remove most MINOR_*, MINOR_* BCEL class file versionsAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-191-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | in favour of Constants.ClassFileVersion.of(int, int). The few ones retained are used from production code, the vast majority of removed ones only from test code. This gets rid of yet another 'AspectJ_JDK_Update' tag. One less place to check and update with each newly supported Java version. :-) Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Prepare code, tests and docs for Java 18Alexander Kriegisch2022-03-211-30/+24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - JDT Core dependency in pom.xml - Constants.java - LangUtil.java - AjcTask.java - messages_aspectj.properties - XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava17Only.java - XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava18*.java - tests/bugs199 - tests/features199 - JavaVersionCompatibility.md - README-199.html - GitHub CI build Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Move some tests from Ajc198TestsJava to Bugs198TestsAlexander Kriegisch2022-02-231-20/+0
| | | | | | | | | They were accidentally stored in thw wrong test class, not just because they are bug regression tests, not 1.9.8 features, but also because they are meant to work on Java 5+, not on Java 17+ like the ones in Ajc198TestsJava. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Improve annotation style if pointcut handlingAndy Clement2022-01-311-15/+30
| | | | | | | | | This fixes: - negating annotation style if() pointcuts doesn't work - annotation style if() pointcut not able to use a binding that is not exposed Fixes #120,#122
* Fix annotation style support for if(true) and if(false)Andy Clement2022-01-171-0/+8
| | | | | | | | | | The documentation specifies annotation style pointcuts can use if(false) or if(true) and not require a boolean return value and body for the @Pointcut annotated method but it doesn't work without this change to validation that recognizes the situation. Fixes #115
* Add + activate some Java 17 testsAlexander Kriegisch2021-09-071-34/+18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | - Fix one fault sanity test configuration - Deactivate Java 16 preview tests (no longer supported by Java 17 compiler) - Test sealed classes as final on Java 17 (no longer preview) - Add tests for JEP 406, pattern matching for switch (preview). At present, the beta 17 branch of JDT Core does not handle the tested features and expected compile errors correctly yet, so I had to temporarily deactivate test execution, only printing TODO messages. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Add AspectJ 1.9.7 and Java 17 test skeletonsAlexander Kriegisch2021-06-261-0/+64
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2025-08-11 12:50:49 +0000