blob: e1f3fa1ca3f880a55574200d01130c502f32fe66 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
|
/*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2022 Contributors
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v 2.0
* which accompanies this distribution, and is available at
* https://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/epl-2.0/EPL-2.0.txt
*******************************************************************************/
package org.aspectj.systemtest.ajc1920;
import junit.framework.Test;
import org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase;
/**
* @author Alexander Kriegisch
*/
public class Bugs1920Tests extends XMLBasedAjcTestCase {
public void testSwitchWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE() {
runTest("switch with Integer.MAX_VALUE case");
}
public void testParenthesisedExpressionWithAjKeyword() {
runTest("parenthesised expression with AspectJ keyword");
}
public void testInterfaceInnerAspectImplicitlyStatic() {
runTest("inner aspect of interface is implicitly static");
}
public void testExactArrayTypeMatchCompiledTogether() {
runTest("exact array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class");
}
public void testExactArrayTypeMatchCompiledSeparately() {
runTest("exact array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class");
}
public void testFuzzyArrayTypeMatchCompiledTogether() {
runTest("fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class");
}
public void testFuzzyArrayTypeMatchCompiledSeparately() {
runTest("fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class");
}
public void test_GitHub_214() {
runTest("ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException with Xlint unorderedAdviceAtShadow=warning");
}
/**
* Add correct annotations to multiple ITD methods with the same name and same number of arguments, i.e. copy the
* annotations correctly from the aspect into the target class instead of falsely always copying the annotations (if
* any) from the first ITD method found.
* <p>
* See <a href="https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/246">GitHub issue 246</a>.
*/
public void test_GitHub_246() {
runTest("add correct annotations to multiple ITD methods with the same name and same number of arguments");
}
/**
* Make sure to create one {@code ajc$inlineAccessMethod} for identically named (overloaded) private aspect methods.
* <p>
* See <a href="https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/250">GitHub issue 250</a>.
*/
public void test_GitHub_250() {
runTest("correctly handle overloaded private methods in aspects");
}
/**
* If one generic method overrides another one with a narrower return type, avoid matching bridge methods.
* <p>
* See <a href="https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/27761">Spring GitHub issue 27761</a>.
* <p>
* This test uses an ASM-modified class file reproducing the problem seen in Spring in plain AspectJ. Before the
* bugfix, it fails with <b>"advice defined in RepositoryAspect has not been applied [Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch]".</b>
*/
public void test_Spring_GitHub_27761() {
runTest("do not match bridge methods");
}
public static Test suite() {
return XMLBasedAjcTestCase.loadSuite(Bugs1920Tests.class);
}
@Override
protected java.net.URL getSpecFile() {
return getClassResource("ajc1920.xml");
}
}
|
