| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR tries to finally fix the bug mentioned in #30011 and #15504,
where the user repo limit is checked when creating a repo in an
organization.
Fix #30011
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: TheFox0x7 <thefox0x7@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
The `team.access_mode` should be either `none` or `admin/owner`.
For non-admin team, the real permissions are provided by `team_unit`.
|
|
|
|
| |
enable testifylint rules disabled in:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/34054
|
|
|
| |
Calls that required context implicitly are made to pass it as argument
|
|
|
|
| |
functions (#33779)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1. GetUserOrgsList should "order by" lower_name
2. GetIssuePostersWithSearch should search in-case-sensitive-ly
3. LoginName should not be used as username
By the way, remove unnecessary "onGiteaRun"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Dear Gitea team,
first of all, thanks for the great work you're doing with this project.
I'm planning to introduce Gitea at a client site, and noticed that while
there is time recording, there are no project-manager-friendly reports
to actually make use of that data, as were also mentioned by others in
#4870 #8684 and #13531.
Since I had a little time last weekend, I had put together something
that I hope to be a useful contribution to this great project (while of
course useful for me too).
This PR adds a new "Worktime" tab to the Organisation level. There is a
date range selector (by default set to the current month), and there are
three possible views:
- by repository,
- by milestone, and
- by team member.
Happy to receive any feedback!
There are several possible future improvements of course (predefined
date ranges, charts, a member time sheet, matrix of repos/members, etc)
but I hope that even in this relatively simple state this would be
useful to lots of people.
<img width="1161" alt="Screen Shot 2022-05-25 at 22 12 58"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/118010/170366976-af00c7af-c4f3-4117-86d7-00356d6797a5.png">
Keep up the good work!
Kristof
---------
Co-authored-by: user <user@kk-git1>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Refactor checks to use assert/require
Use require.Eventually for waiting in elastic and meilisearch tests
Use require to exit early instead of assert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1. fix incorrect tests, for example: BeanExists doesn't do assert and
shouldn't be used
2. remove unnecessary test functions
3. introduce DumpQueryResult to help to see the database rows during
test (at least I need it)
```
====== DumpQueryResult: SELECT * FROM action_runner_token ======
- # row[0]
id: 1
token: xeiWBL5kuTYxGPynHCqQdoeYmJAeG3IzGXCYTrDX
owner_id: 0
...
```
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`RepoTransfer` now is at models, but if we want to move it into `repo`
model, it will depend on `Team`. So this PR also makes repo model depend
on org model to make it possible. Just refactor, no code change.
- [x] Move `DeleteOrganization` from `models/organization` to service
layer
- [x] Move `AccessibleTeamReposEnv` to `models/repo`
- [x] Move `RepoTransfer` from `models` to `models/repo`
- [x] Merge `getUserTeamIDs` and `GetUserTeamIDs`, Merge `GetUserTeams`
and `getUserTeams`.
- [x] Remove `Team`'s `Repos []*repo_model.Repository` to avoid dependency recycle.
|
|
|
|
| |
Enables tenv and testifylint linters
closes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/32842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#32680)
Resolve #31492
The response time for the Pull Requests API has improved significantly,
dropping from over `2000ms` to about `350ms` on my local machine. It's
about `6` times faster.
A key area for further optimization lies in batch-fetching data for
`apiPullRequest.ChangedFiles, apiPullRequest.Additions, and
apiPullRequest.Deletions`.
Tests `TestAPIViewPulls` does exist and new tests added.
- This PR also fixes some bugs in `GetDiff` functions.
- This PR also fixes data inconsistent in test data. For a pull request,
the head branch's reference should be equal to the reference in
`pull/xxx/head`.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are still some functions under `models` after last big refactor
about `models`. This change will move all team related functions to
service layer with no code change.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR rewrites `GetReviewer` function and move it to service layer.
Reviewers should not be watchers, so that this PR removed all watchers
from reviewers. When the repository is under an organization, the pull
request unit read permission will be checked to resolve the bug of
#32394
Fix #32394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reimplement GetUserOrgsList and also move some functions and test to
org_list file.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
currently restricted users can only see the repos of teams in orgs they
are part at.
they also should only see the users that are also part at the same team.
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Refactoring of #32211
this move the PublicOnly() filter calcuation next to the DB querys and
let it be decided by the Doer
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Works in both organization and repository project boards
Fixes #21846
Replaces #21963
Replaces #27117

**Note** that implementation was made intentionally to work same as in
issue list so that URL can be bookmarked for quick access with
predefined filters in URL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There's a bug in #25715:
If user pushed a commit into another repo with same branch name, the
no-related repo will display the recently pushed notification
incorrectly.
It is simple to fix this, we should match the repo id in the sql query.

The latest commit is 2 weeks ago.

The notification comes from another repo with same branch name:

After:
In forked repo:

New PR Link will redirect to the original repo:

In the original repo:

New PR Link:

In the same repo:

New PR Link:

08/15 Update:
Follow #26257, added permission check and logic fix mentioned in
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26257#discussion_r1294085203
2024/04/25 Update:
Fix #30611
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Resolve all cases for `unused parameter` and `unnecessary type
arguments`
Related: #30729
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Noteable additions:
- `redefines-builtin-id` forbid variable names that shadow go builtins
- `empty-lines` remove unnecessary empty lines that `gofumpt` does not
remove for some reason
- `superfluous-else` eliminate more superfluous `else` branches
Rules are also sorted alphabetically and I cleaned up various parts of
`.golangci.yml`.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Replace #6312
Help #5833
Wiki solution for #639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Re-organize the routes in web.go and use ctx constants instead of `context.UnitTypes()`
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
| |
Fix #30378
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR adds `setting.Service.DefaultOrgMemberVisible` value to dataset
of user when the initial org creator is being added to the created org.
Fixes #30012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #17453
This PR adds the abbility to block a user from a personal account or
organization to restrict how the blocked user can interact with the
blocker. The docs explain what's the consequence of blocking a user.
Screenshots:



---------
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
|
|
|
| |
`KeyID` is never set.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
parameter is zero and also introduce new generic methods (#28220)
The function `GetByBean` has an obvious defect that when the fields are
empty values, it will be ignored. Then users will get a wrong result
which is possibly used to make a security problem.
To avoid the possibility, this PR removed function `GetByBean` and all
references.
And some new generic functions have been introduced to be used.
The recommand usage like below.
```go
// if query an object according id
obj, err := db.GetByID[Object](ctx, id)
// query with other conditions
obj, err := db.Get[Object](ctx, builder.Eq{"a": a, "b":b})
```
|
|
|
|
| |
For those simple objects, it's unnecessary to write the find and count
methods again and again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Part of #27065
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR removed `unittest.MainTest` the second parameter
`TestOptions.GiteaRoot`. Now it detects the root directory by current
working directory.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Part of #27065
---------
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
|
|
|
| |
Part of #27065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Part of #27065
This reduces the usage of `db.DefaultContext`. I think I've got enough
files for the first PR. When this is merged, I will continue working on
this.
Considering how many files this PR affect, I hope it won't take to long
to merge, so I don't end up in the merge conflict hell.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#27052)
Currently 'userxx' and 'orgxx' are both used as username in test files
when the user type is org, which is confusing. This PR replaces all
'userxx' with 'orgxx' when the user type is org(`user.type==1`).
Some non-trivial changes
1. Rename `user3` dir to `org3` in `tests/git-repositories-meta`
2. Change `end` in `issue reference` because 'org3' is one char shorter
than 'user3'

3. Change the search result number of `user/repo2` because
`user3/repo21` can't be searched now

4. Change the first org name getting from API because the result is
ordered by alphabet asc and now `org 17` is before `org25`


Other modifications are just find all and replace all.
Unit tests with SQLite are all passed.
---------
Co-authored-by: caicandong <1290147055@qq.com>
|
|
|
| |
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The method is only used in the test. Found it because I changed the
fixtures and had a hard time fixing this test. My revenge is deleting it.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR adds a missing assertion in the `TestGetOrgUsersByOrgID`
function. It also incidentally fixes a small typo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## ⚠️ Breaking
The `log.<mode>.<logger>` style config has been dropped. If you used it,
please check the new config manual & app.example.ini to make your
instance output logs as expected.
Although many legacy options still work, it's encouraged to upgrade to
the new options.
The SMTP logger is deleted because SMTP is not suitable to collect logs.
If you have manually configured Gitea log options, please confirm the
logger system works as expected after upgrading.
## Description
Close #12082 and maybe more log-related issues, resolve some related
FIXMEs in old code (which seems unfixable before)
Just like rewriting queue #24505 : make code maintainable, clear legacy
bugs, and add the ability to support more writers (eg: JSON, structured
log)
There is a new document (with examples): `logging-config.en-us.md`
This PR is safer than the queue rewriting, because it's just for
logging, it won't break other logic.
## The old problems
The logging system is quite old and difficult to maintain:
* Unclear concepts: Logger, NamedLogger, MultiChannelledLogger,
SubLogger, EventLogger, WriterLogger etc
* Some code is diffuclt to konw whether it is right:
`log.DelNamedLogger("console")` vs `log.DelNamedLogger(log.DEFAULT)` vs
`log.DelLogger("console")`
* The old system heavily depends on ini config system, it's difficult to
create new logger for different purpose, and it's very fragile.
* The "color" trick is difficult to use and read, many colors are
unnecessary, and in the future structured log could help
* It's difficult to add other log formats, eg: JSON format
* The log outputer doesn't have full control of its goroutine, it's
difficult to make outputer have advanced behaviors
* The logs could be lost in some cases: eg: no Fatal error when using
CLI.
* Config options are passed by JSON, which is quite fragile.
* INI package makes the KEY in `[log]` section visible in `[log.sub1]`
and `[log.sub1.subA]`, this behavior is quite fragile and would cause
more unclear problems, and there is no strong requirement to support
`log.<mode>.<logger>` syntax.
## The new design
See `logger.go` for documents.
## Screenshot
<details>



</details>
## TODO
* [x] add some new tests
* [x] fix some tests
* [x] test some sub-commands (manually ....)
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now it's 1-based instead of 0-based
- Fixes #24747
### Before

### After

## :warning: BREAKING :warning:
Previous API consumers may have relied on the 0-based pagination of this
endpoint. The page numbering now starts at 1, as documented.
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add test for https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23675
Should be merged after #24117
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/23934
We need to check `AccessModeAdmin` in `CanUserDelete` instead of
`AccessModeOwner`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
At first, we have one unified team unit permission which is called
`Team.Authorize` in DB.
But since https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/17811, we allowed
different units to have different permission.
The old code is only designed for the old version. So after #17811, if
org users have write permission of other units, but have no permission
of packages, they can also get write permission of packages.
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All `access_mode` value of Owner Teams are 0(AccessModeNone) in
`team_unit` table, which should be 4(AccessModeOwner)
In `team` table:

In `team_unit` table:

ps: In https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23630, `access_mode` in
`team_unit` is used to check the team unit permission, but I found that
user can not see issues in owned org repos.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22676
Context Data `IsOrganizationMember` and `IsOrganizationOwner` is used to
control the visibility of `people` and `team` tab.
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/2871ea08096cba15546f357d0ec473734ee9d8be/templates/org/menu.tmpl#L19-L40
And because of the reuse of user projects page, User Context is changed
to Organization Context. But the value of `IsOrganizationMember` and
`IsOrganizationOwner` are not being given.
I reused func `HandleOrgAssignment` to add them to the ctx, but may have
some unnecessary variables, idk whether it is ok.
I found there is a missing `PageIsViewProjects` at create project page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Same as https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22967
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To avoid duplicated load of the same data in an HTTP request, we can set
a context cache to do that. i.e. Some pages may load a user from a
database with the same id in different areas on the same page. But the
code is hidden in two different deep logic. How should we share the
user? As a result of this PR, now if both entry functions accept
`context.Context` as the first parameter and we just need to refactor
`GetUserByID` to reuse the user from the context cache. Then it will not
be loaded twice on an HTTP request.
But of course, sometimes we would like to reload an object from the
database, that's why `RemoveContextData` is also exposed.
The core context cache is here. It defines a new context
```go
type cacheContext struct {
ctx context.Context
data map[any]map[any]any
lock sync.RWMutex
}
var cacheContextKey = struct{}{}
func WithCacheContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context {
return context.WithValue(ctx, cacheContextKey, &cacheContext{
ctx: ctx,
data: make(map[any]map[any]any),
})
}
```
Then you can use the below 4 methods to read/write/del the data within
the same context.
```go
func GetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) any
func SetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key, value any)
func RemoveContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any)
func GetWithContextCache[T any](ctx context.Context, cacheGroupKey string, cacheTargetID any, f func() (T, error)) (T, error)
```
Then let's take a look at how `system.GetString` implement it.
```go
func GetSetting(ctx context.Context, key string) (string, error) {
return cache.GetWithContextCache(ctx, contextCacheKey, key, func() (string, error) {
return cache.GetString(genSettingCacheKey(key), func() (string, error) {
res, err := GetSettingNoCache(ctx, key)
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
return res.SettingValue, nil
})
})
}
```
First, it will check if context data include the setting object with the
key. If not, it will query from the global cache which may be memory or
a Redis cache. If not, it will get the object from the database. In the
end, if the object gets from the global cache or database, it will be
set into the context cache.
An object stored in the context cache will only be destroyed after the
context disappeared.
|