| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In history (from some legacy frameworks), both `:name` and `name` are
supported as path path name, `:name` is an alias to `name`.
To make code consistent, now we should only use `name` but not `:name`.
Also added panic check in related functions to make sure the name won't
be abused in case some downstreams still use them.
|
|
|
| |
Move some legacy code from "base" package to proper packages.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
packages/files (#32148)
Fix #30266
Replace #31533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
@kylef pointed out on https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/31632 that
[RFC7617](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7617.html#section-2)
mandates case-insensitive comparison of the scheme field `Basic`. #31632
copied a case-sensitive comparison from
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/6293. This PR fixes both
comparisons.
The issue only affects OIDC, since the implementation for normal Gitea
endpoints is already correct:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/930ca92d7ce80e8b0bdaf92e495026baf2a1d419/services/auth/basic.go#L55-L58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This field is specified as optional here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7662#section-2.2
It's used by some OIDC integrations, e.g.
https://emersion.fr/blog/2022/irc-and-oauth2/
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See discussion on #31561 for some background.
The introspect endpoint was using the OIDC token itself for
authentication. This fixes it to use basic authentication with the
client ID and secret instead:
* Applications with a valid client ID and secret should be able to
successfully introspect an invalid token, receiving a 200 response
with JSON data that indicates the token is invalid
* Requests with an invalid client ID and secret should not be able
to introspect, even if the token itself is valid
Unlike #31561 (which just future-proofed the current behavior against
future changes to `DISABLE_QUERY_AUTH_TOKEN`), this is a potential
compatibility break (some introspection requests without valid client
IDs that would previously succeed will now fail). Affected deployments
must begin sending a valid HTTP basic authentication header with their
introspection requests, with the username set to a valid client ID and
the password set to the corresponding client secret.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This leverages the existing `sync_external_users` cron job to
synchronize the `IsActive` flag on users who use an OAuth2 provider set
to synchronize. This synchronization is done by checking for expired
access tokens, and using the stored refresh token to request a new
access token. If the response back from the OAuth2 provider is the
`invalid_grant` error code, the user is marked as inactive. However, the
user is able to reactivate their account by logging in the web browser
through their OAuth2 flow.
Also changed to support this is that a linked `ExternalLoginUser` is
always created upon a login or signup via OAuth2.
### Notes on updating permissions
Ideally, we would also refresh permissions from the configured OAuth
provider (e.g., admin, restricted and group mappings) to match the
implementation of LDAP. However, the OAuth library used for this `goth`,
doesn't seem to support issuing a session via refresh tokens. The
interface provides a [`RefreshToken`
method](https://github.com/markbates/goth/blob/master/provider.go#L20),
but the returned `oauth.Token` doesn't implement the `goth.Session` we
would need to call `FetchUser`. Due to specific implementations, we
would need to build a compatibility function for every provider, since
they cast to concrete types (e.g.
[Azure](https://github.com/markbates/goth/blob/master/providers/azureadv2/azureadv2.go#L132))
---------
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR only does "renaming":
* `Route` should be `Router` (and chi router is also called "router")
* `Params` should be `PathParam` (to distingush it from URL query param, and to match `FormString`)
* Use lower case for private functions to avoid exposing or abusing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Do not try to create a new authorization grant when one exists already,
thus preventing a DB-related authorization issue.
Fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/30790#issuecomment-2118812426
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
According to [RFC
6749](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-4.1.2.1),
when the resource owner or authorization server denied an request, an
`access_denied` error should be returned. But currently in this case
Gitea does not return any error.
For example, if the user clicks "Cancel" here, an `access_denied` error
should be returned.
<img width="360px"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15528715/be31c09b-4c0a-4701-b7a4-f54b8fe3a6c5"
/>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit forces the resource owner (user) to always approve OAuth 2.0
authorization requests if the client is public (e.g. native
applications).
As detailed in [RFC 6749 Section 10.2](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6749.html#section-10.2),
> The authorization server SHOULD NOT process repeated authorization
requests automatically (without active resource owner interaction)
without authenticating the client or relying on other measures to ensure
that the repeated request comes from the original client and not an
impersonator.
With the implementation prior to this patch, attackers with access to
the redirect URI (e.g., the loopback interface for
`git-credential-oauth`) can get access to the user account without any
user interaction if they can redirect the user to the
`/login/oauth/authorize` endpoint somehow (e.g., with `xdg-open` on
Linux).
Fixes #25061.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
handling (#30622)
Follow #30454
And fix #24957
When using "preferred_username", if no such field,
`extractUserNameFromOAuth2` (old `getUserName`) shouldn't return an
error. All other USERNAME options do not return such error.
And fine tune some logic and error messages, make code more stable and
more friendly to end users.
|
|
|
| |
"Redirect" functions should only redirect if the target is for current Gitea site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since `modules/context` has to depend on `models` and many other
packages, it should be moved from `modules/context` to
`services/context` according to design principles. There is no logic
code change on this PR, only move packages.
- Move `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/context` to
`code.gitea.io/gitea/services/context`
- Move `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/contexttest` to
`code.gitea.io/gitea/services/contexttest` because of depending on
context
- Move `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/upload` to
`code.gitea.io/gitea/services/context/upload` because of depending on
context
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts #25165 (5bb8d1924d77c675467694de26697b876d709a17), as there
was a chance some important reviews got missed.
so after reverting this patch it will be resubmitted for reviewing again
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25165#issuecomment-1960670242
temporary Open #5512 again
|
|
|
| |
just create transition helper and migrate two structs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/5512
This PR adds basic SAML support
- Adds SAML 2.0 as an auth source
- Adds SAML configuration documentation
- Adds integration test:
- Use bare-bones SAML IdP to test protocol flow and test account is
linked successfully (only runs on Postgres by default)
- Adds documentation for configuring and running SAML integration test
locally
Future PRs:
- Support group mapping
- Support auto-registration (account linking)
Co-Authored-By: @jackHay22
---------
Co-authored-by: jackHay22 <jack@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: morphelinho <morphelinho@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
|
|
|
| |
Follow #29165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Follow #29165.
* Introduce JSONTemplate to help to render JSON templates
* Introduce JSEscapeSafe for templates. Now only use `{{ ... |
JSEscape}}` instead of `{{ ... | JSEscape | Safe}}`
* Simplify "UserLocationMapURL" useage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #28660
Fixes an admin api bug related to `user.LoginSource`
Fixed `/user/emails` response not identical to GitHub api
This PR unifies the user update methods. The goal is to keep the logic
only at one place (having audit logs in mind). For example, do the
password checks only in one method not everywhere a password is updated.
After that PR is merged, the user creation should be next.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Last part of #27065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Part of #27065
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Part of #27065
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Part of #27065
---------
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
|
|
|
| |
Part of #27065
|
|
|
| |
Next step of #27065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Part of #27065
This reduces the usage of `db.DefaultContext`. I think I've got enough
files for the first PR. When this is merged, I will continue working on
this.
Considering how many files this PR affect, I hope it won't take to long
to merge, so I don't end up in the merge conflict hell.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
* `{{.locale.Tr ...}}`
* `{{$.locale.Tr ...}}`
* `{{$.root.locale.Tr ...}}`
* `{{template "sub" .}}`
* `{{template "sub" (dict "locale" $.locale)}}`
* `{{template "sub" (dict "root" $)}}`
* .....
With context function: only need to `{{ctx.Locale.Tr ...}}`
The "ctx" could be considered as a super-global variable for all
templates including sub-templates.
To avoid potential risks (any bug in the template context function
package), this PR only starts using "ctx" in "head.tmpl" and
"footer.tmpl" and it has a "DataRaceCheck". If there is anything wrong,
the code can be fixed or reverted easily.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bumping `github.com/golang-jwt/jwt` from v4 to v5.
`github.com/golang-jwt/jwt` v5 is bringing some breaking changes:
- standard `Valid()` method on claims is removed. It's replaced by
`ClaimsValidator` interface implementing `Validator()` method instead,
which is called after standard validation. Gitea doesn't seem to be
using this logic.
- `jwt.Token` has a field `Valid`, so it's checked in `ParseToken`
function in `services/auth/source/oauth2/token.go`
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Result of running `perl -p -i -e 's#interface\{\}#any#g' **/*` and `make fmt`.
Basically the same [as golang did](https://github.com/golang/go/commit/2580d0e08d5e9f979b943758d3c49877fb2324cb).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Partially fix #23936
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/8aa7f3ad-a5f0-42ce-a478-289a03bd08a3)
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/bb901e7d-485a-47a5-b68d-9ebe7013a6b2)
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/9a1ce0f3-f011-4baf-8e2f-cc6304bc9703)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The PKCE flow according to [RFC
7636](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7636) allows for secure
authorization without the requirement to provide a client secret for the
OAuth app.
It is implemented in Gitea since #5378 (v1.8.0), however without being
able to omit client secret.
Since #21316 Gitea supports setting client type at OAuth app
registration.
As public clients are already forced to use PKCE since #21316, in this
PR the client secret check is being skipped if a public client is
detected. As Gitea seems to implement PKCE authorization correctly
according to the spec, this would allow for PKCE flow without providing
a client secret.
Also add some docs for it, please check language as I'm not a native
English speaker.
Closes #17107
Closes #25047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change prevents Gitea from bypassing the manual approval process
for newly registered users when OIDC is used.
- Resolves https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/23392
Signed-off-by: Gary Moon <gary@garymoon.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Close #24062
At the beginning, I just wanted to fix the warning mentioned by #24062
But, the cookie code really doesn't look good to me, so clean up them.
Complete the TODO on `SetCookie`:
> TODO: Copied from gitea.com/macaron/macaron and should be improved
after macaron removed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
messages (#23982)
Follow #23328
Major changes:
* Group the function in `templates/help.go` by their purposes. It could
make future work easier.
* Remove the `Printf` helper function, there is already a builtin
`printf`.
* Remove `DiffStatsWidth`, replace with `Eval` in template
* Rename the `NewTextFuncMap` to `mailSubjectTextFuncMap`, it's for
subject text template only, no need to make it support HTML functions.
----
And fine tune template error messages, to make it more friendly to
developers and users.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/230714245-4fd202d1-2b25-41b2-8be5-03c5fee45091.png)
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/230714277-66783577-2a03-49d5-8e8c-ceba5e07a2d4.png)
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To avoid duplicated load of the same data in an HTTP request, we can set
a context cache to do that. i.e. Some pages may load a user from a
database with the same id in different areas on the same page. But the
code is hidden in two different deep logic. How should we share the
user? As a result of this PR, now if both entry functions accept
`context.Context` as the first parameter and we just need to refactor
`GetUserByID` to reuse the user from the context cache. Then it will not
be loaded twice on an HTTP request.
But of course, sometimes we would like to reload an object from the
database, that's why `RemoveContextData` is also exposed.
The core context cache is here. It defines a new context
```go
type cacheContext struct {
ctx context.Context
data map[any]map[any]any
lock sync.RWMutex
}
var cacheContextKey = struct{}{}
func WithCacheContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context {
return context.WithValue(ctx, cacheContextKey, &cacheContext{
ctx: ctx,
data: make(map[any]map[any]any),
})
}
```
Then you can use the below 4 methods to read/write/del the data within
the same context.
```go
func GetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) any
func SetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key, value any)
func RemoveContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any)
func GetWithContextCache[T any](ctx context.Context, cacheGroupKey string, cacheTargetID any, f func() (T, error)) (T, error)
```
Then let's take a look at how `system.GetString` implement it.
```go
func GetSetting(ctx context.Context, key string) (string, error) {
return cache.GetWithContextCache(ctx, contextCacheKey, key, func() (string, error) {
return cache.GetString(genSettingCacheKey(key), func() (string, error) {
res, err := GetSettingNoCache(ctx, key)
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
return res.SettingValue, nil
})
})
}
```
First, it will check if context data include the setting object with the
key. If not, it will query from the global cache which may be memory or
a Redis cache. If not, it will get the object from the database. In the
end, if the object gets from the global cache or database, it will be
set into the context cache.
An object stored in the context cache will only be destroyed after the
context disappeared.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #19555
Test-Instructions:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21441#issuecomment-1419438000
This PR implements the mapping of user groups provided by OIDC providers
to orgs teams in Gitea. The main part is a refactoring of the existing
LDAP code to make it usable from different providers.
Refactorings:
- Moved the router auth code from module to service because of import
cycles
- Changed some model methods to take a `Context` parameter
- Moved the mapping code from LDAP to a common location
I've tested it with Keycloak but other providers should work too. The
JSON mapping format is the same as for LDAP.
![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/195634392-3fc540fc-b229-4649-99ac-91ae8e19df2d.png)
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The regular login flow can use a `redirect_to` cookie to ensure the user
ends their authentication flow on the same page as where they started
it.
This commit adds the same functionality to the OAuth login URLs, so that
you can use URLs like these to directly use a specific OAuth provider:
`/user/oauth2/{provider}?redirect_to={post-login path}`
Only the `auth.SignInOAuth()` function needed a change for this, as the
rest of the login flow is aware of this cookie and uses it properly
already.
|
|
|
|
| |
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.
Fix #16132
Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A simple refactor to reduce duplicate codes.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Found using
`find . -type f -name '*.go' -print -exec vim {} -c
':%s/fmt\.Errorf(\(.*\)%v\(.*\)err/fmt.Errorf(\1%w\2err/g' -c ':wq' \;`
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The OAuth spec [defines two types of
client](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-2.1),
confidential and public. Previously Gitea assumed all clients to be
confidential.
> OAuth defines two client types, based on their ability to authenticate
securely with the authorization server (i.e., ability to
> maintain the confidentiality of their client credentials):
>
> confidential
> Clients capable of maintaining the confidentiality of their
credentials (e.g., client implemented on a secure server with
> restricted access to the client credentials), or capable of secure
client authentication using other means.
>
> **public
> Clients incapable of maintaining the confidentiality of their
credentials (e.g., clients executing on the device used by the resource
owner, such as an installed native application or a web browser-based
application), and incapable of secure client authentication via any
other means.**
>
> The client type designation is based on the authorization server's
definition of secure authentication and its acceptable exposure levels
of client credentials. The authorization server SHOULD NOT make
assumptions about the client type.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.4
> Authorization servers MUST record the client type in the client
registration details in order to identify and process requests
accordingly.
Require PKCE for public clients:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.1
> Authorization servers SHOULD reject authorization requests from native
apps that don't use PKCE by returning an error message
Fixes #21299
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
According to the OAuth spec
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-6 when "Refreshing
an Access Token"
> The authorization server MUST ... require client authentication for
confidential clients
Fixes #21418
Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #21202
Closes #21276
An `ExternalLoginUser` is not mandatory if the current user account was
created with/by the external login source.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Support OAuth2 applications created by admins on the admin panel, they
aren't owned by anybody.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
|