| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #2616
This PR adds a new sort option for exclusive labels.
For exclusive labels, a new property is exposed called "order", while in
the UI options are populated automatically in the `Sort` column (see
screenshot below) for each exclusive label scope.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Follow #33127
Fix #8649, fix #639
This is a complete solution. A repo unit could be set to:
* Anonymous read (non-signed-in user)
* Everyone read (signed-in user)
* Everyone write (wiki-only)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #33484
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Provide external Integration information about the Queue lossly based on
https://docs.github.com/en/webhooks/webhook-events-and-payloads?actionType=completed#workflow_job
Naming conflicts between GitHub & Gitea are here, Blocked => Waiting,
Waiting => Queued
Rationale Enhancement for ephemeral runners management #33570
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/33519
As discussed in [PR
#33614](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/33614), the
ScopedAccessTokenSelector Vue component is not particularly useful.
This PR removes the component and reverts to using HTML templates. It
also introduces some (hopefully) useful refactoring.
The Vue component was causing the UX bug reported in the linked issue.
Required form fields are now properly working, as expected (see
screenshot).

---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #32873
Fix #33201
~Fix #33244~
~Fix #33302~
depends on ~#33396~
A part of this PR should be backported to v1.23 manually.
|
|
|
| |
Follow #33432
|
|
|
| |
Initial PR for #24469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Extract from #33320
This PR uses a map instead of a struct to store webhook event
information. It removes many duplicated functions and makes the logic
clearer.
|
|
|
| |
Close #8649, close #639 (will add "anonymous access" in following PRs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Found while investigating #33210.
This line no longer makes sense because the form field "TagName" is
required, so this would mean that this code path would never be covered.
Because it isn't covered, we end up going down the "update release"
logic where we eventually set `Release.IsTag` to false (meaning it will
now be treated as a release instead of a tag).
This snapshot rewrites the condition to ensure that we aren't trying to
create a tag that already exists.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Redesign the time tracker side bar, and add "time estimate" support (in "1d 2m" format)
Closes #23112
---------
Co-authored-by: stuzer05 <stuzer05@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Close #25037
Close #31037
This PR adds a Arch package registry usable with pacman.

Rewrite of #25396 and #31037. You can follow [this
tutorial](https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Creating_packages) to build a
package for testing.
Docs PR: https://gitea.com/gitea/docs/pulls/111
Co-authored-by: [d1nch8g@ion.lc](mailto:d1nch8g@ion.lc)
Co-authored-by: @ExplodingDragon
---------
Co-authored-by: dancheg97 <dancheg97@fmnx.su>
Co-authored-by: dragon <ExplodingFKL@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes a TODO in the code to validate the RedirectURIs when adding
or editing an OAuth application in user settings.
This also includes a refactor of the user settings tests to only create
the DB once per top-level test to avoid reloading fixtures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## Solves
Currently for rules to re-order them you have to alter the creation
date. so you basicly have to delete and recreate them in the right
order. This is more than just inconvinient ...
## Solution
Add a new col for prioritization
## Demo WebUI Video
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/92182a31-9705-4ac5-b6e3-9bb74108cbd1
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
|
|
|
| |
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Follow #32460
Now the code could be much clearer than before and easier to maintain. A
lot of legacy code is removed.
Manually tested.
This PR is large enough, that fine tunes could be deferred to the future if
there is no bug found or design problem.
Screenshots:
<details>

</details>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Users could add reviewers when creating new PRs.
---------
Co-authored-by: splitt3r <splitt3r@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Sauer <sauer.sebastian@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: bb-ben <70356237+bboerben@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This introduces a new flag `BlockAdminMergeOverride` on the branch
protection rules that prevents admins/repo owners from bypassing branch
protection rules and merging without approvals or failing status checks.
Fixes #17131
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR adds support for migrating repos from [AWS
CodeCommit](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codecommit/latest/userguide/welcome.html).
The access key ID and secret access key are required to get repository
information and pull requests. And [HTTPS Git
credentials](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codecommit/latest/userguide/setting-up-gc.html)
are required to clone the repository.
<img
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/82ecb2d0-8d43-42b0-b5af-f5347a13b9d0"
width="680" />
The AWS CodeCommit icon is from [AWS Architecture
Icons](https://aws.amazon.com/architecture/icons/).
<img
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3c44d21f-d753-40f5-9eae-5d3589e0d50d"
width="320" />
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Gitea 1.22.1 was supposed to allow for team names of length 255 (up from
30) after the following PR was merged in:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/31410. However, the length of
team names was still limited to 30 as described in this issue:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/31554.
One more change to _gitea_ needs to be made to allow for the longer team
names, as there is a 30 character limit here:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/2c92c7c5226e29636a1d47a277130f477fa2037b/services/forms/org.go#L65
This PR changes that value to 255.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #22722
### Problem
Currently, it is not possible to force push to a branch with branch
protection rules in place. There are often times where this is necessary
(CI workflows/administrative tasks etc).
The current workaround is to rename/remove the branch protection,
perform the force push, and then reinstate the protections.
### Solution
Provide an additional section in the branch protection rules to allow
users to specify which users with push access can also force push to the
branch. The default value of the rule will be set to `Disabled`, and the
UI is intuitive and very similar to the `Push` section.
It is worth noting in this implementation that allowing force push does
not override regular push access, and both will need to be enabled for a
user to force push.
This applies to manual force push to a remote, and also in Gitea UI
updating a PR by rebase (which requires force push)
This modifies the `BranchProtection` API structs to add:
- `enable_force_push bool`
- `enable_force_push_whitelist bool`
- `force_push_whitelist_usernames string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_teams string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_deploy_keys bool`
### Updated Branch Protection UI:
<img width="943" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/7491899c-d816-45d5-be84-8512abd156bf">
### Pull Request `Update branch by Rebase` option enabled with source
branch `test` being a protected branch:

<img width="1038" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/57ead13e-9006-459f-b83c-7079e6f4c654">
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR split the `Board` into two parts. One is the struct has been
renamed to `Column` and the second we have a `Template Type`.
But to make it easier to review, this PR will not change the database
schemas, they are just renames. The database schema changes could be in
future PRs.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
According to [RFC
6749](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-4.1.2.1),
when the resource owner or authorization server denied an request, an
`access_denied` error should be returned. But currently in this case
Gitea does not return any error.
For example, if the user clicks "Cancel" here, an `access_denied` error
should be returned.
<img width="360px"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15528715/be31c09b-4c0a-4701-b7a4-f54b8fe3a6c5"
/>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Initial support for #25680
This PR only adds some simple styles from GitHub, it is big enough and
it focuses on adding the necessary framework-level supports. More styles
could be fine-tuned later.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Replace #6312
Help #5833
Wiki solution for #639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Resolve #29660
Follow #29522 and #29609
Add a warning for disallowed email domains when admins manually add/edit
users.
Thanks @yp05327 for the
[comment](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29605#issuecomment-1980105119)

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #29000
Fix #28685
Fix #18568
Related: #27497
And by the way fix #24036, add a Cancel button there (one line)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #17453
This PR adds the abbility to block a user from a personal account or
organization to restrict how the blocked user can interact with the
blocker. The docs explain what's the consequence of blocking a user.
Screenshots:



---------
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Part of #23318
Add menu in repo settings to allow for repo admin to decide not just if
projects are enabled or disabled per repo, but also which kind of
projects (repo-level/owner-level) are enabled. If repo projects
disabled, don't show the projects tab.

---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |

`/admin/users/<UserID>/edit`

`/admin/users/<UserID>`
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since `modules/context` has to depend on `models` and many other
packages, it should be moved from `modules/context` to
`services/context` according to design principles. There is no logic
code change on this PR, only move packages.
- Move `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/context` to
`code.gitea.io/gitea/services/context`
- Move `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/contexttest` to
`code.gitea.io/gitea/services/contexttest` because of depending on
context
- Move `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/upload` to
`code.gitea.io/gitea/services/context/upload` because of depending on
context
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #27960, #24411, #12183
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts #25165 (5bb8d1924d77c675467694de26697b876d709a17), as there
was a chance some important reviews got missed.
so after reverting this patch it will be resubmitted for reviewing again
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25165#issuecomment-1960670242
temporary Open #5512 again
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/5512
This PR adds basic SAML support
- Adds SAML 2.0 as an auth source
- Adds SAML configuration documentation
- Adds integration test:
- Use bare-bones SAML IdP to test protocol flow and test account is
linked successfully (only runs on Postgres by default)
- Adds documentation for configuring and running SAML integration test
locally
Future PRs:
- Support group mapping
- Support auto-registration (account linking)
Co-Authored-By: @jackHay22
---------
Co-authored-by: jackHay22 <jack@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: morphelinho <morphelinho@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Clarify when "string" should be used (and be escaped), and when
"template.HTML" should be used (no need to escape)
And help PRs like #29059 , to render the error messages correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With this option, it is possible to require a linear commit history with
the following benefits over the next best option `Rebase+fast-forward`:
The original commits continue existing, with the original signatures
continuing to stay valid instead of being rewritten, there is no merge
commit, and reverting commits becomes easier.
Closes #24906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
can be changed in settings later (#28814)
As more and more options can be set for creating the repository, I don't
think we should put all of them into the creation web page which will
make things look complicated and confusing.
And I think we need some rules about how to decide which should/should
not be put in creating a repository page. One rule I can imagine is if
this option can be changed later and it's not a MUST on the creation,
then it can be removed on the page. So I found trust model is the first
one.
This PR removed the trust model selections on creating a repository web
page and kept others as before.
This is also a preparation for #23894 which will add a choice about SHA1
or SHA256 that cannot be changed once the repository created.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #27114.
* In Gitea 1.12 (#9532), a "dismiss stale approvals" branch protection
setting was introduced, for ignoring stale reviews when verifying the
approval count of a pull request.
* In Gitea 1.14 (#12674), the "dismiss review" feature was added.
* This caused confusion with users (#25858), as "dismiss" now means 2
different things.
* In Gitea 1.20 (#25882), the behavior of the "dismiss stale approvals"
branch protection was modified to actually dismiss the stale review.
For some users this new behavior of dismissing the stale reviews is not
desirable.
So this PR reintroduces the old behavior as a new "ignore stale
approvals" branch protection setting.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Remove `ObjectFormatID`
- Remove function `ObjectFormatFromID`.
- Use `Sha1ObjectFormat` directly but not a pointer because it's an
empty struct.
- Store `ObjectFormatName` in `repository` struct
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Refactor Hash interfaces and centralize hash function. This will allow
easier introduction of different hash function later on.
This forms the "no-op" part of the SHA256 enablement patch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Say to the binding middleware which locale should be used for the
required error.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1683
(cherry picked from commit 5a2d7966127b5639332038e9925d858ab54fc360)
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #25117
Add UI for choosing branch to fork
Change default branch on single-branch forks

---------
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## Archived labels
This adds the structure to allow for archived labels.
Archived labels are, just like closed milestones or projects, a medium to hide information without deleting it.
It is especially useful if there are outdated labels that should no longer be used without deleting the label entirely.
## Changes
1. UI and API have been equipped with the support to mark a label as archived
2. The time when a label has been archived will be stored in the DB
## Outsourced for the future
There's no special handling for archived labels at the moment.
This will be done in the future.
## Screenshots


Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25237
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Telegram has recently implemented threads (channels) for group chats.
Co-authored-by: neveraskedtoexist <matikot415@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Resolves #25057
This adds a E-Mail field to Organisations. The E-Mail is just shown on
the Profile when it is visited by a logged in User. The E-mail is not
used for something else.
**Screenshots:**


---------
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <privat@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|