| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Provide external Integration information about the Queue lossly based on
https://docs.github.com/en/webhooks/webhook-events-and-payloads?actionType=completed#workflow_job
Naming conflicts between GitHub & Gitea are here, Blocked => Waiting,
Waiting => Queued
Rationale Enhancement for ephemeral runners management #33570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some visual improvement for the commit status webhook message introduced
by #33320
- use short commit SHA as already done in e. g. commit webhook
- fix spacing, link text
- do not set user link for internal gitea-actions user
Before:

After:

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a X-GitHub Header port
* repository for repository webhooks (matches GitHub)
* organization for organization webhooks (matches GitHub)
* user for user webhooks (Gitea specific)
* system for system webhooks (Gitea specific)
* default for default hooks needs testing (Gitea specific)
- `X-Gitea-Hook-Installation-Target-Type`
- `X-GitHub-Hook-Installation-Target-Type`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Replace all contexts in tests with go1.24 t.Context()
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Gitea Actions generated target url doesn't contain host and port. So we
need to include them for external webhook visiting.
Fix #33603
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #32873
Fix #33201
~Fix #33244~
~Fix #33302~
depends on ~#33396~
A part of this PR should be backported to v1.23 manually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR created a mock webhook server in the tests and added integration
tests for generic webhooks.
It also fixes bugs in package webhooks and pull request comment
webhooks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Extract from #33320
This PR uses a map instead of a struct to store webhook event
information. It removes many duplicated functions and makes the logic
clearer.
|
|
|
| |
And fix some FIXMEs
|
|
|
| |
Close #27918
|
|
|
| |
Fix #32897
|
|
|
|
| |
Enables tenv and testifylint linters
closes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/32842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Resolves #32371.
#31970 should have just showed the commit summary, but
`strings.SplitN()` was misused such that we did not perform any
splitting at all and just used the message. This was not caught in the
unit test made in that PR since the test commit summary was > 50 (which
truncated away the commit description).
This snapshot resolves this and adds another unit test to ensure that we
only show the commit summary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR introduces a new event which is similar as Github's. When a new
commit status submitted, the event will be trigged. That means, now we
can receive all feedback from CI/CD system in webhooks or other notify
systems.
ref:
https://docs.github.com/en/webhooks/webhook-events-and-payloads#status
Fix #20749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
close #25833
Currently, the information for "requested_reviewers" is only included in
the webhook event for reviews. I would like to suggest adding this
information to the webhook event for "PullRequest comment" as well, as
they both pertain to the "PullRequest" event.
Also, The reviewer information for the Pull Request is not displayed
when it is approved or rejected.
|
|
|
| |
Resolves #31668.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A more complete fix for #31588
1. Make "generic" code more readable
2. Clarify HTML or Markdown for the payload content
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Enable [unparam](https://github.com/mvdan/unparam) linter.
Often I could not tell the intention why param is unused, so I put
`//nolint` for those cases like webhook request creation functions never
using `ctx`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Noteable additions:
- `redefines-builtin-id` forbid variable names that shadow go builtins
- `empty-lines` remove unnecessary empty lines that `gofumpt` does not
remove for some reason
- `superfluous-else` eliminate more superfluous `else` branches
Rules are also sorted alphabetically and I cleaned up various parts of
`.golangci.yml`.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #29879
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #29837 which is a regression caused by
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29145/files#diff-731445ee00f0f1bf2ff731f4f96ddcf51cdc53fd2faaf406eb3536fc292ea748L48.
The line was probably removed by accident.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
| |
Follow #29690
|
|
|
| |
Fix #29689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Refactor the webhook logic, to have the type-dependent processing happen
only in one place.
---
## Current webhook flow
1. An event happens
2. It is pre-processed (depending on the webhook type) and its body is
added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, some more logic (depending on the webhook
type as well) is applied to make an HTTP request
This means that webhook-type dependant logic is needed in step 2 and 3.
This is cumbersome and brittle to maintain.
Updated webhook flow with this PR:
1. An event happens
2. It is stored as-is and added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, the event is processed (depending on the
webhook type) to make an HTTP request
So the only webhook-type dependent logic happens in one place (step 3)
which should be much more robust.
## Consequences of the refactor
- the raw event must be stored in the hooktask (until now, the
pre-processed body was stored)
- to ensure that previous hooktasks are correctly sent, a
`payload_version` is added (version 1: the body has already been
pre-process / version 2: the body is the raw event)
So future webhook additions will only have to deal with creating an
http.Request based on the raw event (no need to adjust the code in
multiple places, like currently).
Moreover since this processing happens when fetching from the task
queue, it ensures that the queuing of new events (upon a `git push` for
instance) does not get slowed down by a slow webhook.
As a concrete example, the PR #19307 for custom webhooks, should be
substantially smaller:
- no need to change `services/webhook/deliver.go`
- minimal change in `services/webhook/webhook.go` (add the new webhook
to the map)
- no need to change all the individual webhook files (since with this
refactor the `*webhook_model.Webhook` is provided as argument)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and migrate affected code
_last refactoring bits to replace **util.OptionalBool** with
**optional.Option[bool]**_
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Go 1.21 improved the performance of `crypto/sha256`. It's now similar to
`minio/sha256-simd`, so we should just use the standard libs.
https://go.dev/doc/go1.21#crypto/sha256
https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/408795
https://github.com/multiformats/go-multihash/pull/173
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Refactor Hash interfaces and centralize hash function. This will allow
easier introduction of different hash function later on.
This forms the "no-op" part of the SHA256 enablement patch.
|
|
|
|
| |
For those simple objects, it's unnecessary to write the find and count
methods again and again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #28088
Fixes #28094
Added missing tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #23742
---------
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When `webhook.PROXY_URL` has been set, the old code will check if the
proxy host is in `ALLOWED_HOST_LIST` or reject requests through the
proxy. It requires users to add the proxy host to `ALLOWED_HOST_LIST`.
However, it actually allows all requests to any port on the host, when
the proxy host is probably an internal address.
But things may be even worse. `ALLOWED_HOST_LIST` doesn't really work
when requests are sent to the allowed proxy, and the proxy could forward
them to any hosts.
This PR fixes it by:
- If the proxy has been set, always allow connectioins to the host and
port.
- Check `ALLOWED_HOST_LIST` before forwarding.
|
|
|
| |
Last part of #27065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR removed `unittest.MainTest` the second parameter
`TestOptions.GiteaRoot`. Now it detects the root directory by current
working directory.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
| |
Extract from #22266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/24368
## what my pull request does
Since the official documentation states that custom bots do not support
hyperlink functionality, simply adding it without making some formatting
changes would result in an unappealing output. Therefore, I have
modified the formatting of the output. Currently, it is only used for
Feishu.
---
[docs](https://open.feishu.cn/document/uAjLw4CM/ukTMukTMukTM/im-v1/message/create_json#%E8%B6%85%E9%93%BE%E6%8E%A5%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8%E8%AF%B4%E6%98%8E)
<img width="641" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/360e1c81-ab64-4ef6-851e-aa450d6e85a4">
- Issue
<img width="423" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/519f6fae-81ab-4ec8-89b8-f6a73ff93783">
- Issue Comment
<img width="548" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/749c0d1c-3657-431e-b787-8bf4c23cce83">
- Assign
<img width="431" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/066f99e5-eabb-455d-91fb-a8359cc26dc7">
<img width="457" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/c6c10f99-db83-46ef-a775-4c91979fa68f">
- Merge
<img width="408" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/e627bf43-5954-45aa-acf6-261ee046802f">
- PullRequest
<img width="425" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/72cfa714-d3fa-4fb9-abdd-e8508d756056">
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We now include the branch filler in the response.
- Closes #26591
# Before

# After

---------
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Telegram has recently implemented threads (channels) for group chats.
Co-authored-by: neveraskedtoexist <matikot415@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add webhook events for pull request review requests
- Fixes #26371
- Added support for the "Pull request review requested" and "Pull
request review request removed" webhook events.
- Updated the `getPullRequestPayloadInfo` function in `general.go` to
handle these new webhook events.
# Before

# After

Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Attemp fix: #25744
Fixing the log level when we delete any repo then we get error hook not
found by id. That should be warn level to reduce the noise in the logs.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #25257
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The old code generates `structs.Repository.Permissions` with only
`access.Permission.AccessMode`, however, it should check the units too,
or the value could be incorrect. For example,
`structs.Repository.Permissions.Push` could be false even the doer has
write access to code unit.
Should fix
https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/issues/14059#issuecomment-1047961128
(Not reported by it, I just found it when I was looking into this bug)
---
Review tips:
The major changes are
- `modules/structs/repo.go`
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25388/files#diff-870406f6857117f8b03611c43fca0ab9ed6d6e76a2d0069a7c1f17e8fa9092f7
- `services/convert/repository.go`
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25388/files#diff-7736f6d2ae894c9edb7729a80ab89aa183b888a26a811a0c1fdebd18726a7101
And other changes are passive.
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #25185
Caused by #24634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
after #24481
To keep consistent, maybe pull_request_review_request is better.
## what my pull request does
Rename NotifyPullReviewRequest to NotifyPullRequestReviewRequest.
<img width="1087" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/2cf91f02-74f2-42fe-a998-0a039b821d8d">
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before there was a "graceful function": RunWithShutdownFns, it's mainly
for some modules which doesn't support context.
The old queue system doesn't work well with context, so the old queues
need it.
After the queue refactoring, the new queue works with context well, so,
use Golang context as much as possible, the `RunWithShutdownFns` could
be removed (replaced by RunWithCancel for context cancel mechanism), the
related code could be simplified.
This PR also fixes some legacy queue-init problems, eg:
* typo : archiver: "unable to create codes indexer queue" => "unable to
create repo-archive queue"
* no nil check for failed queues, which causes unfriendly panic
After this PR, many goroutines could have better display name:


|